1/ I read the subpoenas the @January6thCmte issued to Meta (Facebook), Alphabet (Google/YouTube), Twitter and Reddit:
techpolicy.press/january-6-comm…
@January6thCmte 2/ At Alphabet, the Committee is focused on YouTube. One thing that caught my eye- the Committee seeks "non-public moderation discussions and policies that led to President Trump's suspension"... interesting.
3/ At Meta (Facebook), the Committee wants more information about some of the details revealed by whistleblower @FrancesHaugen:
@FrancesHaugen 4/ Having written quite a lot about The Donald, the @January6thCmte is right to focus on that community, but it also raises the question of whether it is looking at TheDonald[.]win, its post-Reddit manifestation where violence at the Capitol was planned:
5/ As with YouTube, when it comes to Twitter one interesting thing the Committee is looking for is information regarding its decision making process when making the call to remove Trump from the platform.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin Hendrix

Justin Hendrix Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @justinhendrix

13 Jan
The Wall Street Journal revealed the existence of a program at Facebook called Cross Check that gave elites special consideration. The Oversight Board chastised the company for failing to disclose it. @MChrisRiley has recommendations for the board:
techpolicy.press/cross-checking…
Background reading- in September @JeffHorwitz kicked off the Facebook Files- a series of reports based on leaked documents from whistleblower Frances Haugen- with a report on Cross Check: wsj.com/articles/faceb…
@JeffHorwitz Facebook's own Oversight Board was kept in the dark about the existence of the program despite its inquiry into content moderation practices related to the suspension former President Donald Trump. cnn.com/2021/10/21/tec…
Read 4 tweets
12 Jan
1/ One question inquiries into January 6th seek to answer is the extent to which Donald Trump and his close associates were aware of the potential for violence. On Sunday’s Meet the Press, @RepKinzinger (R-IL), a member of the House Select Committee, raised this line of inquiry:
2/ In @just_security, I suggest a potentially fruitful indicator of Trump’s awareness of the detailed planning for violent assaults on the Capitol is what he and his closest aides knew about the discourse on a public message board: TheDonald[.]win. justsecurity.org/79813/thedonal…
@just_security 3/ To understand the likelihood that such communications were known to the Trump team, and how that knowledge might be proven, it is important to understand the history of The Donald, and how Donald Trump, his campaigns, and advisors interacted with it:
justsecurity.org/79813/thedonal…
Read 8 tweets
9 Jan
1/ This week's two-part @techpolicypress podcast focuses on Extremism, Media & Tech One Year After January 6.

Segment 1 features @DFRLab's @jaredlholt on his new report on how domestic extremism has evolved in the year since the insurrection:
techpolicy.press/the-sunday-sho…
@techpolicypress @DFRLab @jaredlholt 2/ Segment 2 features @NewAmerica Future Frontlines report authors @CandaceRondeaux and Ben Dalton on their new report, Parler and the Road to the Capitol Attack: Investigating Alt-Tech Ties to January 6 techpolicy.press/the-sunday-sho…
@techpolicypress @DFRLab @jaredlholt @NewAmerica @CandaceRondeaux 3/ Segment 3 features @CheckMyAdsHQ founders @nandoodles and @catthekin on their new campaign to hold ad tech firms accountable for doing business with insurrectionist extremists: techpolicy.press/the-sunday-sho…
Read 10 tweets
19 Dec 21
To me, the problem with the idea any intervention can take the web back to its "idealist origins" is that most of humanity and its various institutions and other units of organization are not "idealist". So social and power dynamics will always win. @mims
wsj.com/articles/jack-…
We may pray that less platform centralization will reduce some of the externalities of the model we have now, but that's mostly faith- religion for some- driven by memories of a time when most people and organizations weren't online.
Don't take this as negativity on web3 per se- but it's not just the protocol that's broken. It's that we rebuilt all of the structural problems we have in the real world and then some on the web, with almost zero protections for those harmed.
Read 5 tweets
19 Dec 21
This week the @techpolicypress podcast focuses on race, technology & policy:

@CarmenScurato, @JacquieSMason, and @suheradi on the Disinfo Defense League policy platform

@kreissdaniel & @madhavi_reddi on the need for race conscious platform policies
techpolicy.press/the-sunday-sho…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(