World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting 2022 Deferred —
“The deferral of the meeting will not prevent progress through continued digital convening of leaders from business, government and civil society”

— Democracies should not participate in the #WEF

1/n weforum.org/press/2021/12/…
The reasons are simple:

1. Democracies operate on the basis of certain fundamental principles and human rights.

2. These include: equality of every citizen, nobody is granted privileges, equality of arms, equal rights to participate in public affairs.

2/n
3. #WEF grants privileged access to democratic leaders, politicians, and ministers.

4. Access can be bought or otherwise secured by only very few selected leaders from “business” and “civil society”.

5. Uncivil society is totally excluded from #WEF.

3/n
6. By granting privileged access to politicians and ministers #WEF works against fundamental principles of democracy.

7. Excluded citizens are deprived of their human right to influence politics.

8. The privileged gain opportunities to influence and lobby politicians.

4/n
9. #WEF is not accountable to the citizens of any participating democracy.

10. #WEF alone decides who gets to participate in preparing the policies and laws for democracies.

5/n
11. Democratic leaders and politicians that participate in #WEF violate their obligation to uphold fundamental principles and human rights.

12. Citizens of any democracy have a right to require that their politicians and ministers refrain from participating in #WEF.

6/n
14. If their governments and politicians refuse to refrain from #WEF participation, citizens can go to court and demand an order to the government.

15. It is time citizens assert their rights. Democracy is under assault from various sides. The time for action is now.

7/7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof em. dr drs mr Lucas Bergkamp, LL.M. (Yale)

Prof em. dr drs mr Lucas Bergkamp, LL.M. (Yale) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lucasbergkamp

15 Jan
Calculating The Full Costs Of Electrifying Everything Using Only Wind, Solar And Batteries —

The cost of renewables are huge! Gigantic! But governments are still in denial.

1/n
manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2022-1-14…
“Advocates of “decarbonizing” our energy system, along with promoters of wind and solar energy, claim that the cost of electricity from the wind and sun was dropping rapidly and soon would be less than the cost of generating the same electricity from fossil fuels.”
“These claims are based on a metric called the “Levelized Cost of Energy,” which is designed to seem sophisticated to the uninitiated, but in the real world is misleading because it omits the largest costs of a system where most generation comes from intermittent sources.”
Read 6 tweets
15 Jan
Waarom vindt Haagse Gerechtshof beroep van Shell tegen Milieudefensie ‘gevoelig’? — Nu het Haagse hof zichzelf heeft gediskwalificeerd als onpartijdige rechter, zal er waarschijnlijk nog een andere rechter aan te pas moeten komen: de Hoge Raad.

1/n wyniasweek.nl/waarom-vindt-h…
De Hoge Raad herschreef de Grondwet en het mensenrechtenverdrag met het beruchte Urgenda arrest.

Vanuit diezelfde Hoge Raad is nu al een duidelijk signaal gegeven dat partijen die rechterlijke klimaatdictaten aanvallen, niet op sympathie hoeven te rekenen.

2/n
De advocaat-generaal bij die raad schreef in een artikel over de Shell-zaak letterlijk: “Wij raken allang niet meer opgewonden van het gegeven dat ons leven mede wordt beheerst door afdwingbaar ongeschreven recht. …

3/n
Read 5 tweets
11 Jan
Het nieuwe kabinet heeft wel twee ministers van en voor "het klimaat" en een minister voor machtsbescherming (onder de noemer van "justitie en veiligheid"), maar geen minister voor herstel van de democratische rechtsstaat. Dat laatste zou de hoogste prioriteit moeten zijn.

1/n
De Nederlandse democratische rechtsstaat is cynisch en hypocriet geworden.

Onder het mom van bescherming van de vrijheid/VVMU wordt de vrijheid/VVMU afgebouwd met incoherente theorieen van conflicterende vrijheden en 'haatpraat'.

2/n
Onder het mom van tolerantie wordt intolerantie ingevoerd met incoherente theorieen van diversiteit, inclusie en equity.

De paradox van de paradox van intolerantie.

3/n
Read 18 tweets
9 Jan
Democratic dictatorship: “We may remain, as we are now, nominally democratic, but be ruled by a technocratic class empowered by greater powers of surveillance than those enjoyed by even the nosiest of dictatorships” spectator.co.uk/article/welcom…
“Climate-change policies could nurture the new autocracy for a generation. As tech oligarchs and the financial establishment implement the Davos notion of a Great Reset, they will force a quick end to fossil fuels.”
“The conscious policy of degrowth as a means of forcibly reducing greenhouse gas emissions will require getting most people out of their cars, and forcing them to travel far less and to live in tiny apartments. Enforcement will be necessarily intrusive as well.”
Read 11 tweets
8 Jan
GroenLinks “roept op tot de oprichting van nieuwe tribunalen. Tot nieuwe rechtbanken, die niet langer de regels van onze rechtsstaat volgen.”

1/2 groenlinks.nl/nieuws/jesse-k…
“Om ecocide strafbaar te maken, moet een van die landen een wijzigingsvoorstel indienen voor de toevoeging aan het Statuut van Rome, het oprichtingsverdrag van het Internationaal Strafhof.” groenlinks.nl/klimaat/waarom…
“De strategie van de klimaatbeweging is duidelijk: foltering en ecocide moeten deel uitmaken van hun gereedschapskist, zodat klimaatontkenners kunnen worden opgesloten. Het is echter onvermijdelijk dat dit soort ‘klimatisme’ de weg opent naar klimaattotalitarisme.”
Read 4 tweets
8 Jan
WEF — “Governance” is niet hetzelfde als “government” en heeft weinig uit te staan met democratie of de rechtsstaat. WEF is een voorstander van methoden die om de democratie heen werken. Zogeheten participatoire democratie is zo’n methode. Zie weforum.org/agenda/2017/10…
“The problem that we have is not globalization. The problem is a lack of global governance, a lack of means to address global issues.” KS

Een wereldregering kan per definitie niet democratisch zijn. Maar dat is wel wat het WEF wil.
“In a democracy, if the electorate is engaged in a participatory process before a decision is taken, leaders wouldn’t need to legitimize and delegate their decisions and, ultimately, their leadership. They wouldn’t need to outsource their responsibility by holding a referendum”
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(