Thijs Van de Graaf Profile picture
Jan 15, 2022 13 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Thrilled to see the launch of @IRENA’s report on the geopolitics of hydrogen: bit.ly/33wQOxz
It has been a pleasure to serve as the lead author and work with a great team under the guidance of @ElizabethSPress
#TheHydrogenFactor #IRENA12A Image
It is hard to summarize all of the ideas in the report in a thread, but here are some of the key themes. 🧵
1) In 2017, just one country (Japan) had a national hydrogen strategy. Today, more than 30 countries have one or are preparing one. Image
2) Hydrogen is already a major industry. Current annual hydrogen sales represent a market value of approximately USD 174 billion, which already exceeds the value of annual LNG trade. Image
3) Hydrogen is set for major acceleration. In decarbonization scenarios, its sales could grow x5 and it could come to represent 12% of final energy consumption by 2050. Most of that hydrogen would be green hydrogen. Image
4) Global efforts should focus on the applications that provide the most immediate advantages and enable economies of scale, particularly in the coming years. This includes refineries, steel, international shipping and long-haul aviation. Image
5) Hydrogen could become an internationally traded commodity. Driven by transport costs, a dual market for hydrogen is likely to emerge: a regional market, traded through pipelines, and a global market for ammonia, methanol, and other liquid fuels. Image
6) Countries are forging deals to establish the first trading routes and initial trial shipments have been carried out. For prospective importers/exporters, hydrogen diplomacy is becoming a standard fixture of economic diplomacy. Image
7) Hydrogen has the potential to disrupt energy value chains. The hydrogen business will be more competitive and less lucrative than oil and gas. Image
8) Green hydrogen has the potential to create a new class of energy exporters. Rather than just exporting hydrogen, regions with abundant renewables could attract new energy-intensive industries and become sites of green industrialization. Image
9) Hydrogen offers a transition pathway for fossil fuel exporters. They can leverage existing infrastructure, a skilled workforce and existing trade relations. However, hydrogen will not fully compensate for expected loss in revenues. Image
10)The 2020s could be the era of the big race for technology leadership. For key pieces of equipment such as electrolysers and fuel cells, Europe and Japan dominate innovation, but China is well positioned in manufacturing. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thijs Van de Graaf

Thijs Van de Graaf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thijsvandegraaf

Jul 12, 2023
📢 @IRENA’s new report on the geopolitics of critical materials has just been launched.

Proud to have been involved in the production of this report, working with a great team under the guidance of @ElizabethSPress.

Here’s a thread with some of my takeaways: 🧵

(1/n)
Energy transition technologies will become major drivers of demand for critical materials.

Today, 66% of all lithium goes to the energy sector. By 2030, this share could rise to 95-99%.

>50% of all graphite, dysprosium and cobalt could go to the energy sector by 2030.

(2/n)
In this decade, some markets for critical materials could become very tight, such as lithium and dysprosium.

Raising supply fast enough is difficult due to the long lead times to create new mines.

(3/n)
Read 14 tweets
Oct 17, 2022
As 🇪🇺 is moving closer to imposing a PRICE CAP on gas, here is a summary of what a price cap is and what it is not. 🧵

1/15
By my count, there are now at least 5 versions of a gas price cap as discussed in the EU.

2/15
1.ADMINISTRATIVE PRICING: decreeing a maximum sales price for all European gas imports, either limited to benchmark hubs (e.g., “freezing” TTF) or covering all transactions (whether on an exchange or OTC). Seems off the table for now, except for emergencies.

3/15
Read 15 tweets
May 31, 2022
I see many early analyses of the EU's #oil #embargo against Russia but one crucial point that is not mentioned very often is that the package is almost certainly going to include a #shipping #insurance ban.

This might make or break the EU's oil embargo. 🧵
The details still need to be fleshed out, but if it is included, the #insuranceban is a potentially powerful tool.

95% of shipping insurance for Russian oil was carried out in Europe, primarily in London.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The insurance ban would not just affect Russian oil exports to Europe. It would affect Russian oil exports everywhere else.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 23, 2022
Can Russia really turn off the gas taps to Europe? Some thoughts. 🧵
Russia can afford to turn off the taps. Russia earns 5x more from export of oil than from export of gas (pipeline + LNG) and it holds over $630 bn in foreign reserves. But that does not imply it will cut-off gas deliveries to Europe.
During the 2014 Ukraine crisis, when Russia annexed Crimea, gas supplies to Europe kept on flowing. They were interrupted only in June, months after the annexation, and with relatively little impact (since it was summer). tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Read 9 tweets
Feb 21, 2022
Wat bedenkingen bij de geopolitieke “analyse” van @BouziAdam en @FChombar ter ondersteuning van de keepthelightson.be campagne. keepthelightson.be/wp-content/upl…
Ja, invoer van aardgas gaat gepaard met geopolitieke risico’s. Maar slechts 27% van het gas dat wij verbruiken gaat naar productie van elektriciteit. Al dan niet verlengen 2 reactoren is dus hoogstens een druppel op een hete plaat. Image
Mensen voorspiegelen dat je Poetin’s gaswapen kan ontwapenen met verlenging D4/T3 is misleidend en leidt de aandacht af van veel sterkere oplossingen om onze importafhankelijkheid te verminderen (efficiëntie, hernieuwbare energie, etc.) Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 31, 2022
Will petrostates such as Russia only grow stronger as the energy transition progresses?

@OSullivanMeghan and @JasonBordoff suggest they will.
nytimes.com/2022/01/27/opi…

But some arguments seem debatable, or even contradictory. A thread.🧵
The first argument goes like this: the clean energy transition will cause more price volatility, and this will strengthen the geopolitical hand of petrostates.
In reality, volatility has been a permanent fixture of fossil fuel markets as @Bob_McNally has shown. If anything, renewables bring more fuel diversity to the energy system and lower price volatility. In fact, @JasonBordoff has made this argument before: bit.ly/3ANcPVf
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(