It is hard to summarize all of the ideas in the report in a thread, but here are some of the key themes. 🧵
1) In 2017, just one country (Japan) had a national hydrogen strategy. Today, more than 30 countries have one or are preparing one.
2) Hydrogen is already a major industry. Current annual hydrogen sales represent a market value of approximately USD 174 billion, which already exceeds the value of annual LNG trade.
3) Hydrogen is set for major acceleration. In decarbonization scenarios, its sales could grow x5 and it could come to represent 12% of final energy consumption by 2050. Most of that hydrogen would be green hydrogen.
4) Global efforts should focus on the applications that provide the most immediate advantages and enable economies of scale, particularly in the coming years. This includes refineries, steel, international shipping and long-haul aviation.
5) Hydrogen could become an internationally traded commodity. Driven by transport costs, a dual market for hydrogen is likely to emerge: a regional market, traded through pipelines, and a global market for ammonia, methanol, and other liquid fuels.
6) Countries are forging deals to establish the first trading routes and initial trial shipments have been carried out. For prospective importers/exporters, hydrogen diplomacy is becoming a standard fixture of economic diplomacy.
7) Hydrogen has the potential to disrupt energy value chains. The hydrogen business will be more competitive and less lucrative than oil and gas.
8) Green hydrogen has the potential to create a new class of energy exporters. Rather than just exporting hydrogen, regions with abundant renewables could attract new energy-intensive industries and become sites of green industrialization.
9) Hydrogen offers a transition pathway for fossil fuel exporters. They can leverage existing infrastructure, a skilled workforce and existing trade relations. However, hydrogen will not fully compensate for expected loss in revenues.
10)The 2020s could be the era of the big race for technology leadership. For key pieces of equipment such as electrolysers and fuel cells, Europe and Japan dominate innovation, but China is well positioned in manufacturing.
As 🇪🇺 is moving closer to imposing a PRICE CAP on gas, here is a summary of what a price cap is and what it is not. 🧵
1/15
By my count, there are now at least 5 versions of a gas price cap as discussed in the EU.
2/15
1.ADMINISTRATIVE PRICING: decreeing a maximum sales price for all European gas imports, either limited to benchmark hubs (e.g., “freezing” TTF) or covering all transactions (whether on an exchange or OTC). Seems off the table for now, except for emergencies.
I see many early analyses of the EU's #oil#embargo against Russia but one crucial point that is not mentioned very often is that the package is almost certainly going to include a #shipping#insurance ban.
Can Russia really turn off the gas taps to Europe? Some thoughts. 🧵
Russia can afford to turn off the taps. Russia earns 5x more from export of oil than from export of gas (pipeline + LNG) and it holds over $630 bn in foreign reserves. But that does not imply it will cut-off gas deliveries to Europe.
During the 2014 Ukraine crisis, when Russia annexed Crimea, gas supplies to Europe kept on flowing. They were interrupted only in June, months after the annexation, and with relatively little impact (since it was summer). tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Ja, invoer van aardgas gaat gepaard met geopolitieke risico’s. Maar slechts 27% van het gas dat wij verbruiken gaat naar productie van elektriciteit. Al dan niet verlengen 2 reactoren is dus hoogstens een druppel op een hete plaat.
Mensen voorspiegelen dat je Poetin’s gaswapen kan ontwapenen met verlenging D4/T3 is misleidend en leidt de aandacht af van veel sterkere oplossingen om onze importafhankelijkheid te verminderen (efficiëntie, hernieuwbare energie, etc.)
But some arguments seem debatable, or even contradictory. A thread.🧵
The first argument goes like this: the clean energy transition will cause more price volatility, and this will strengthen the geopolitical hand of petrostates.
In reality, volatility has been a permanent fixture of fossil fuel markets as @Bob_McNally has shown. If anything, renewables bring more fuel diversity to the energy system and lower price volatility. In fact, @JasonBordoff has made this argument before: bit.ly/3ANcPVf