The standard against which our faith and practice will be measured is truth. We’ll find no refuge in the prevailing orthodoxies of our time. The danger of religious fundamentalism is that it blinds its adherents to this distinction between prevailing orthodoxy & objective truth.
That’s why fundamentalists can see no difference between rejecting God’s Word and rejecting what they say about God’s Word.
That’s why fundamentalists in the SBC are so resistant to institutional reform: once we look beyond what’s good according to the established order and inquire into the goodness of the established order, moral authority shifts away from ambitious men and toward the truth itself.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Coley

Scott Coley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scott_m_coley

24 Dec 21
I see we’re talking about David and Bathsheba again.

Some thoughts.

Either Bathsheba was raped or she committed adultery. There is no gray area. If you say that she wasn’t raped, you are saying that she committed adultery.
It makes no sense to say that she wasn’t raped on the grounds that the text doesn’t explicitly describe a violent rape: that would be tantamount to claiming that she committed adultery, and the text doesn’t say that either.
The text requires us to draw an inference. So which inference has more textual support: rape, or adultery?
Read 33 tweets
22 Dec 21
One of the more pernicious effects of evangelicalism’s intellectual ghettoization has been the emergence of gatekeeping media within evangelicalism that mimic those outside evangelicalism.
Most laypeople understand, e.g., that the gold standard for research is a genre of academic literature known as peer-reviewed journals. So if evangelicals want their scholarship to be taken seriously, they need to publish in peer-reviewed journals.
But there’s a problem. No reputable journal will publish an argument, e.g., that commends “biblical patriarchy” or young earth creationism. So if evangelicals want their agenda to be taken seriously, they need to create their own peer-reviewed journals.
Read 19 tweets
22 Dec 21
Do you find it at all odd that on an almost weekly basis, some pastor, seminarian or graduate student publishes an allegedly devastating refutation of a book written by a professional academic in the prime of her career?
Suppose I told you that one day, as a college student in Chapel Hill, I was shooting hoops down at Woollen Gym, when in walks Vince Carter—a proud UNC alumnus then in the prime of an illustrious NBA career. What if I told you that I challenged him to a game of 1-on-1?
And what if I told you that I not only defeated peak Vince Carter in that game of 1-on-1, but did so in humiliating fashion—exposing every weakness in his game.
Read 14 tweets
18 Dec 21
Textbook DARVO: the real victims in all of this, according to @RevKevDeYoung , are “his people”—namely, average white evangelicals like those he pastors.
Not those harmed by the conduct or political preferences of white evangelicals, but white evangelicals themselves—forced to live under a cloud of castigation for their alleged epistemic and moral shortcomings.
The real victims are none other than (arguably) the single most powerful political constituency in the most powerful empire in human history—whose obstinate indifference to others’ well-being threatens everything from public health to the survival of our democratic institutions.
Read 16 tweets
16 Dec 21
Human cognition is plagued by motivated reasoning and a tendency to invent narratives that legitimize morally indefensible social arrangements.

In other words, what we do has an effect on what we believe—corrupt habits tend to corrupt beliefs.
So it’s unsurprising that men who enslaved other human beings would cultivate an ideology of racial hierarchy to legitimize their morally indefensible conduct toward fellow image-bearers.
And since our regard for fellow image-bearers reflects our regard for the God whose image we bear, it’s unsurprising that white supremacists would manipulate theology to underwrite their ideology—mangling the doctrine of the Trinity with their paradigm of authority & submission.
Read 4 tweets
16 Dec 21
I’ve seen some guys expressing big feelings about my comments on the effortless Christianity of many white evangelical men in the US—particularly as it pertains to marriage and gender.

This has occasioned a few additional thoughts.
If I were to take every single statement about marriage and gender in that thread and reduce it to the basic proposition it expresses, I guarantee you that I could find an identical proposition endorsed in one or more best-selling evangelical books on marriage and sexuality.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(