The standard against which our faith and practice will be measured is truth. We’ll find no refuge in the prevailing orthodoxies of our time. The danger of religious fundamentalism is that it blinds its adherents to this distinction between prevailing orthodoxy & objective truth.
That’s why fundamentalists can see no difference between rejecting God’s Word and rejecting what they say about God’s Word.
That’s why fundamentalists in the SBC are so resistant to institutional reform: once we look beyond what’s good according to the established order and inquire into the goodness of the established order, moral authority shifts away from ambitious men and toward the truth itself.
I see we’re talking about David and Bathsheba again.
Some thoughts.
Either Bathsheba was raped or she committed adultery. There is no gray area. If you say that she wasn’t raped, you are saying that she committed adultery.
It makes no sense to say that she wasn’t raped on the grounds that the text doesn’t explicitly describe a violent rape: that would be tantamount to claiming that she committed adultery, and the text doesn’t say that either.
The text requires us to draw an inference. So which inference has more textual support: rape, or adultery?
One of the more pernicious effects of evangelicalism’s intellectual ghettoization has been the emergence of gatekeeping media within evangelicalism that mimic those outside evangelicalism.
Most laypeople understand, e.g., that the gold standard for research is a genre of academic literature known as peer-reviewed journals. So if evangelicals want their scholarship to be taken seriously, they need to publish in peer-reviewed journals.
But there’s a problem. No reputable journal will publish an argument, e.g., that commends “biblical patriarchy” or young earth creationism. So if evangelicals want their agenda to be taken seriously, they need to create their own peer-reviewed journals.
Do you find it at all odd that on an almost weekly basis, some pastor, seminarian or graduate student publishes an allegedly devastating refutation of a book written by a professional academic in the prime of her career?
Suppose I told you that one day, as a college student in Chapel Hill, I was shooting hoops down at Woollen Gym, when in walks Vince Carter—a proud UNC alumnus then in the prime of an illustrious NBA career. What if I told you that I challenged him to a game of 1-on-1?
And what if I told you that I not only defeated peak Vince Carter in that game of 1-on-1, but did so in humiliating fashion—exposing every weakness in his game.
Textbook DARVO: the real victims in all of this, according to @RevKevDeYoung , are “his people”—namely, average white evangelicals like those he pastors.
Not those harmed by the conduct or political preferences of white evangelicals, but white evangelicals themselves—forced to live under a cloud of castigation for their alleged epistemic and moral shortcomings.
The real victims are none other than (arguably) the single most powerful political constituency in the most powerful empire in human history—whose obstinate indifference to others’ well-being threatens everything from public health to the survival of our democratic institutions.
Human cognition is plagued by motivated reasoning and a tendency to invent narratives that legitimize morally indefensible social arrangements.
In other words, what we do has an effect on what we believe—corrupt habits tend to corrupt beliefs.
So it’s unsurprising that men who enslaved other human beings would cultivate an ideology of racial hierarchy to legitimize their morally indefensible conduct toward fellow image-bearers.
And since our regard for fellow image-bearers reflects our regard for the God whose image we bear, it’s unsurprising that white supremacists would manipulate theology to underwrite their ideology—mangling the doctrine of the Trinity with their paradigm of authority & submission.
I’ve seen some guys expressing big feelings about my comments on the effortless Christianity of many white evangelical men in the US—particularly as it pertains to marriage and gender.
If I were to take every single statement about marriage and gender in that thread and reduce it to the basic proposition it expresses, I guarantee you that I could find an identical proposition endorsed in one or more best-selling evangelical books on marriage and sexuality.