There have been a number of recent studies that haven't really reached MSM - highlighting the complex biology of long COVID. TL;DR: Long COVID & even 'mild' infection is associated with:
- long term immune dysregulation and inflammation
- virus persistence
- neuro-inflammation
Here's a study of 147 people with SARS-CoV-2 infection - of whom 31 had long COVID (fatigue, breathlessness or chest pain at 4 months). These patients were compared with 31 age, & gender matched controls who had symptomatic acute illness but no long COVID.
nature.com/articles/s4159…
They were also compared to uninfected healthy donors (UHDs) who were essentially healthy patients who had provided research samples before 2019, as well as patients who had been infected with other seasonal coronaviruses (not SARS-CoV-2). Levels of 28 biomarkers were compared.
Characteristics of patients were very similar, and the vast majority of both cases and controls had 'mild' acute infection, although a higher proportion of those who went onto develop long COVID had been hospitalised compared to those who didn't (26% vs 6%)
Patients had repeated measurements of markers done from blood up to 8 months. While there was no difference in biomarkers at 4 months post-infection between those who developed long COVID & those who didn't - both gps had higher levels of markers than those without infection.
But both long COVID cases & controls (no long COVID post-infection) had higher levels of 6 biomarkers than uninfected controls (pre-pandemic healthy controls, or those infected by other human coronaviruses). IFN-β was 7-8x ⬆️ in those infected at 4 months compared to uninfected.
While many of these reduced at the 8 month time point for the non-long COVID control group (MC), they *remained high* for the long COVID group. IFN-β & IFN-λ1 remained elevated in the long COVID group compared to the non-long COVID infected group, & uninfected controls.
The elevation of biomarkers was so consistent that the authors were able to build a prediction model for long COVID based on the markers in their blood at *8 months* which predicted them as having long COVID with 80% accuracy simply from the levels of markers in their blood.
The authors then compared the immune cell response and types of immune cells in people with long COVID compared with those who did not have long COVID post-infection. They found substantial differences.
There was chronic activation of a type of CD8+ T cells, that are important for virus clearance. As well as signs of T cell exhaustion, and absence of naive T and B cell subsets - all of which suggest long-term impact on the immune system.
What this means in practical terms is unclear- but concerning nevertheless. There are several ways immune dysregulation can mainfest - immune deficiency against other pathogens, auto-immune disease, or even cancer (several viruses have been linked with cancer yrs later).
Understanding what this immune dysregulation that was clearly present at least at 8 months, and possibly longer means will take time, but this shows that long COVID clearly shows a different immunological profile compared to people who don't have persistent symptoms.
Whether this is because of persistence of virus, or virus antigen, or auto-immunity post-infection isn't known yet. It could be one of these, or even a combination - but all possibilities should concern us.
Another preprint from @VirusesImmunity & others, that came out recently with rather concerning findings. They studied the brains of humans and mice with 'mild' SARS-CoV-2 infection. Autopsies were done 9 people who died of other causes while infected or few wks post-infection.
Compared to autopsies in 5 people without infection, brain tissue showed microglial reactivity in subcortical white matter. Microglia are an immune cell found in the brain, and microglial reactivity is often associated with neurodegeneration.
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Microglial reactivity can impair the generation of new neurons in the hippocampus, the part of the brain responsible for memory formation. The investigators found similar findings in the mouse brain as well
Mice brains also showed increased microglial reactivity - in hippocampal white matter at 7-days post-infection persisting until at least 7-weeks post-infection. Generation of new neurons in the hippocampus was also reduced in mice.
The scientists also compared people with long COVID and 'brain fog' with those with long COVID without cognitive symptoms. They found elevated inflammatory markers (CCL11 cytokine levels) in the blood of people
suffering from long-COVID with and without brain fog
Another recent study examined autopsies from people who had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 up to 230 days ago- including some who had mild/asymptomatic infection (died from other causes) - showing long-term persistence of virus in multiple tissues.
assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-11390…
*All* 44 people autopsied had virus RNA in at least one tissue- 98% in the lung; heart (80%); lymphoid tissue (86%), gut (73%), kidney/endocrine tissue (64%); reproductive (42.5%); muscle, skin, adipose, and peripheral nervous tissue (68.2%); eye (58%), brain (91%)
The authors also looked at sub-genomic virus RNA (sgRNA) and cell culture to examine whether virus in these tissues was dead or was likely to be replicating. sgRNA was detected in multiple tissues even after a month in 43% of the autopsies & even at day 99 in a late autopsy.
This suggests dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 to multiple tissues and virus persistence for long periods of time- up to 230 days in heart, lung, brain and eye. Multi-system involvment seems to occur even in those with mild infection, as seen in the autopsy of a child in this series.
Previous work has also shown long-term persistence of the virus in olfactory neuro-epithelium of those who have loss of smell post COVID-19 - with persistence up to 6 months
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
All these studies clearly show immunological & inflammatory correlates of long COVID and neuro-inflammation in brains of people with long COVID. This appears to occur even in those with mild infection. We also see virus persistence in multiple organs for long durations.
I'd really like to see those suggesting long COVID is 'psychosomatic' or not something to be concerned about explain how we can actually predict long COVID with reasonable accuracy simply from looking at blood markers of people post-infection.
We know that many viruses have been associated with severe complications- inflammatory, auto-immune and cancers- decades later. Very recent paper on association between EBV and multiple sclerosis.
science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
It's going to take years to understand the full impact on SARS-CoV-2, but the fact that it's causing long-term illnesses far more common that we've seen with many other viruses, including neuro-cognitive dysfunction is very worrying.
The symptoms appear to correlate with inflammatory biomarkers, and long-term immune dysregulation which could be related to viral persistence. We really need to stop treating this as an acute illness alone, and one where infection is benign. It's not.
Anyone reading the extensive literature now on the long term impacts of the virus on multiple organ systems, and the immune system would be very worried about what the future holds. We've had millions of people infected in single weeks at points. What will this mean for them?
I know the acute toll of COVID-19 has been terrible, but if we continue to ignore the long-term toll, we are risking the health of millions of people across the globe with a virus we know persists in multiple tissues, and is associated with multiple markers of neuro-degeneration.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Deepti Gurdasani

Deepti Gurdasani Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dgurdasani1

16 Jan
It's precisely because of pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic spread that we need masks, social distancing, ventilation, testing & quarantines. It's an airborne virus and these measures are vital. Also it's not 90-99% less severe- certainly not in unvaxx/non-immune (e.g. children).
also wrong to say hospitals won't come under severe stress- they will, and this is happening all across the globe, including in the Uk, and many parts of the US as well:
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Important that discourse on omicron considers all evidence, and is accurate so as to inform the public. Saying masks don't work with an airborne pathogen due to asymptomatic spread is frankly ridiculous and unhelpful. High grade masks vital at this time.
Read 5 tweets
16 Jan
We're living the 'focused protection' GBD fantasy now- except that it doesn't work. Ask the many CV families who have been in self-lockdown for yrs with no end in sight - & those are the ones who can afford to. The ones that couldn't risk their lives & health every day.
When you think about the minor inconvenience of wearing a mask, imagine their plight. Their lives are much smaller than they used to be, because they've been devalued by a govt & society focused on 'freedoms' for some over others.
They have to choose between having a life and being alive. Many children losing their childhoods to this, because their freedom depends on school policies, and what others around them do. Please do consider that a huge proportion of our population is CV.
Read 6 tweets
10 Jan
Lots of people dismissing links between COVID-19 and all-cause diabetes. An association that's been shown in multiple studies- whether this increase is due to more diabetes or SARS2 precipitating diabetic keto-acidosis allowing these to be diagnosed is not known. A brief look👇
Peer-reviewed study from Imperial researchers published in Diabetes Care. This study showed an 80% increase in presentation of new cases of type I diabetes under 17 years between March 23rd and June 4th 2020.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32816997/
Most presented with an acute form of diabetes called diabetic keto-acidosis (DKA). DKA is an acute presentation of diabetes- which can be life-threatening. It's usually caused or precipitated by certain factors, including infections.
Read 22 tweets
10 Jan
Utter rubbish platformed by @GMB. Schools aren't safe - because of England's exceptional policy in schools- 117,000 children with long COVID (tripled in 5 months), and 82 deaths (annual death rate 2-3x flu, and much greater than other childhood illnesses). These are the facts.
Interesting that GMB doesn't actually put out the clip of the opposing view that highlights this here. The narrative is rather 'anxious mum', rather than children and families beinng failed by govt, media, and society.

Many of these children's (and parents) lives, and health could've been saved by mitigations in schools and vaccination, which wasn't offered to parents for primary school age groups, and delayed massively even for adolescents. And the media is fully complicit.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
This is incorrect- if you consider reduction in intrinsic severity (*less* than the reduction in *observed severity* which is due to disproportionate infection of immune people) one would consider this about as severe as the original variant which was *much more* severe than flu.
This is important to consider given a large proportion of the globe, and even countries like the UK, US and Europe are not vaccinated. In the UK 30% remain unvaccinated.
and this is not even considering the impact of long COVID, which we currently don't even know with omicron, but even with the original variant, long COVID was an important consideration, causing multi-system damage and chronic illness in significant numbers.
Read 7 tweets
9 Jan
Got to love this- first of all the fluMOMO algorithm estimates excess deaths in a season- 'associated with flu activity' or 'influenza' not necessarily those with flu as the primary cause. Second, even looking at these, please show me where it says you get 300 deaths/day.
And here's a bit on FluMOMO- the key bit here is is considers all excess deaths during winter to be down to flu (except considering extreme temperatures as another cause), when in fact many of these deaths will not have flu as primary cause.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Here's is the critical bit, that the authors acknowledge in the original paper on fluMOMO. It calculates excess mortality, which can occur from other causes:
"Other respiratory pathogens are not directly included in the model, even though they may affect winter mortality. "
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(