Love this paper. Majorly jealous of the Scottish Health Informatics/Research infrastructure that enables this. A 🧵on #MedsInPregnancy TL;DR- get the vaccine, protect yourself, protect your baby. Ignore other messaging- they’re either misinformed or trying to sell you something
To place COVID vaccines in context, we now have more pregnancy outcome data for them than for a lot of other commonly used medicines. This study adds data on over 18,000 pregnancies to a constantly evolving evidence base.
Vaccine coverage in pregnancy is disappointing with less half the level of vaccine uptake in pregnancy compared with the general female population 18-44yrs: 32.3% vs. 77.4%
As usual there are sociodemographic determinants of vaccine uptake with the most deprived having less than half the level of uptake of the least deprived quintile.
The vast majority of the burden of infections, hospital admissions and critical care admissions is borne by the unvaccinated.
The likelihood of the baby being stillborn or dying in the first 4 weeks of life is raised to a worrying extent if there has been a COVID infection within 28 days of birth. Compare the absolute risk for those who get COVID and those who are vaccinated:
The likelihood of preterm birth is also significantly raised by COVID within 28 days of birth. Those who have any COVID vaccination have the same rate as the background population.
COVID is causing devastating PREVENTABLE adverse pregnancy outcomes. The absolute risk of stillbirth or death in the first 4 wks is greater than that from poorly controlled diabetes or smoking above 40 cigarettes per day ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Health professionals- please play your part in informing and supporting women in this decision making process. Messaging should be clear- there is considerable risk of avoidable harm without the vaccine. #BoostTheBump#VaccinesSaveLives
Some thoughts on risk perception/risk communication in light of this week's @EMA_News statement on the possible link between the AZ #COVID19 vaccine & rare blood clots. A thread 🧵
Low probability, high consequence events are called dread risks. pure.mpg.de/rest/items/ite… There is a risk in avoiding risk. People can make decisions to avoid a rare risk that put them at a greater risk of a more common adverse outcome.
We don't know right now if the observed association between the vaccine and very rare clotting/bleeding issues is causal or if there may be some underlying factor involved. We don't know the baseline risk of these events in the context of the pandemic.
This tweet (especially the graph below-definitely a feasible outcome) is gravely concerning as we think about the 4th wave. Imagine the scenario in October where we’re looking back on this carnage & wondering where it went wrong. A few things that I think we would regret:
There was interprofessional sniping within the vaccination programme with vested interests arguing that they’re the best at vaccination instead of pooling skills and resources to maximise vaccine coverage.
There was no centralised continuous assessment of the optimal processes to maximise yield per vial, considering available consumables.
It is fantastic to see the #COVID19 vaccination programme begin #VaccinesSaveLives. Some initial thoughts for now & the weeks/months ahead (personal views): 1. All hands on deck approach in hospitals led to efficient systems vaccinating large numbers in a short space of time
2. True multidisciplinary working meant that expertise to solve problems & evolve the process was on hand 3. The hospital facilities that were used for this will have ~ 2 week lull before the second dose (accepting some delayed vaccines in between)
4. Mass vaccination centres won’t be set up over night so these suggestions focus on the next few weeks 5. Legislation is in place enabling a broad range of health professionals to vaccinate