I just learnt that German Chancellor Olaf Scholz visited the GDR in 1984 and met with the Communist Party leadership. One wonders on what grounds the communists agreed to such a meeting? Maybe they saw "potential" in Scholz?
Then Scholz visited the GDR again in 1987. One can assume such visits weren't allowed unless they supposedly gave results for the communists. The "peace" movement from the time was an instrument from Moscow to reduce the will to fight in the west.
Then I looked at Merkel's background when she grew up in the GDR. Apparently she had the backing of the local communist party for an "unprecedented" initiative. What person gets "unprecedented" backing in a communist dictatorship?
It has also been said that as a young adult Merkel propagated Marxism, but it should be stated that Merkel disputes this.
In 1986 Merkel was allowed to travel to West Germany. Keep in mind that people dreaming of escaping to the West risked being shot dead while trying. Merkel were allowed to leave, she was trusted enough to come back. How come she was so trusted?
Many people say that persons mature over time and leave their ideology from youth behind them. Is that really true? I think we become more moderate but I don't think we leave the fundamental beliefs from youth.
I remember studying geography at school when I was eight. We looked at a map over the Baltic Sea and I mentioned the USSR was so close. My teacher snapped at me. "That's not the Soviet Union. Thats Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania" she said angrily. Lesson learned and remembered.
My teacher was born in Finland and thinking back on it I understand why the normally so lovely woman snapped at me. She new the price of freedom, and she shared her knowledge with me.
That episode from my childhood gave me an early understanding of what the Soviet Union was. Now I wonder what it does to a child's brain if the child is subjected to daily propaganda with potential punishment if the message is not accepted. Will that not form thinking for life?
Gerhard Schröder started working for Putin right after he left office, Merkel was so trusted by the dictatorship that she was allowed to travel to the West and Scholz went on his on free will to the East and was allowed to meet communist leaders.
Germany is the EU's largest country by population, it's the leading economy and considering its leaders the last 20 years one might also draw conclusions about why so many political decisions made in Germany were beneficial to Moscow.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anders Östlund

Anders Östlund Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andersostlund

Jan 17,
German FM @ABaerbock's response that "we will not help you defend your country because of our history" must be one of the dumbest things ever said. Germany's history already killed millions of Ukrainians, and now even more should die because of Germany's history.
@ABaerbock The selfishness and arrogance from the German governments side is brutal. How dare they block arms sales to Ukraine? How dare they encourage Russias war against Ukraine? Baerbock should be sent for a tour to the victims families and explain to them why their children died.
The German government has basically had "Make Russia Great Again" as the lead foreign policy objective the last 30 years.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 16,
From Moscow I know what to expect.
It's Berlin that worries me. Why is it so hard for German leaders to stand untied against war and brutal human rights violations? I don't mean some token gesture but real action. Something that has effect.
No other government in Europe has had more potential influence over Russia than the German one. But in my opinion that influence has not been used for good but rather the opposite, it has been used to protect Russia and give it freedom of maneuver.
I follow many German political and security analysts here and I see how many of them are becoming more and more frustrated by the German governments position towards Russia. The analysts wants a harder stand, it's clear to me.
Read 47 tweets
Jan 15,
A large drone, that could fly despite heavy winds, was seen flying above the nuclear reactor Ringhals outside Varberg in Sweden Friday night. Police searched the area on foot and with helicopter but the drone escaped.
svd.se/okand-stor-dro…
At the same time as the drone was reported above Ringhals similar reports came in from the nuclear power plants in Forsmark and Oskarshamn. Police responded with helicopters but it could not be established drones had actually flown there.
Meanwhile the Swedish Armed Forces has launched a campaign to encourage citizens to report any "unusual activities at land or sea".
Via @Russianmindset
Read 4 tweets
Dec 26, 2021
Why Schröder's and Merkel's generation of German leaders enabled the rise of Putin's Russia is one for the psychiatrists to sort out.
What is beyond question is that their actions might have fatally undermined Europe's security.
That mistakes made in the 30s were repeated is obvious. One can only hope that future leaders will not make the same mistakes again. Never feed an aggressor with resources, never offer it political and diplomatic support and protection, never let it get away with war.
And how many other European leaders are crawling for the Kremlin fascists? How many former leaders are now working for it? How did this continent become so corrupt?
Read 4 tweets
Dec 23, 2021
The debate about how Russian and Chinese propaganda is washed into real news by western news outlets has moved forward in Sweden.
Credit to @ghokmark and @patrikoksanen for addressing it.
expressen.se/debatt/sa-pave…
@ghokmark @patrikoksanen The problem has been going on for a long time. In 2014 it was a disaster, now it's a little bit better but not good enough. Media who wants to be taken seriously MUST review and investigate its sources. Is @Reuters really credible when it reports news from TASS as if true?
@ghokmark @patrikoksanen @Reuters Is "press conference" really a good word to describe what Putin is doing today? Selected journalists, questions approved in advance, no critical follow up questions. Wouldn't "propaganda performance" be a better word to describe the event?
Read 15 tweets
Dec 9, 2021
Very good one by @OlgaNYC1211!
Russia has two assets for extortion now; fossil fuels and its military. In some years the fossil fuels will lose its value and there will only be the military left. Russia will be like North Korea.
cepa.org/putin-extorts-…
@OlgaNYC1211 The North Korean regime is extremely totalitarian and the population is brain washed. North Korea can only get attention through military recklessness. Russia is rapidly adopting this model. Just imagine Putin in power for another decade - what will Russia be like then?
@OlgaNYC1211 What is to be done with the Russian population? How to protect a potential for a normal Russia in the future? The way I see it we have to open the borders for Russians who want to emigrate to Europe. Russian democrats can shelter in Europe until there's a chance for a new Russia.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(