⬆ 5th or 6th highest surface temps
⬆ Warmest summer on land
⬆ Warmest year for 25 countries + 1.8 billion people
⬆ Record ocean heat
⬆ Record high GHGs
⬆ Record high sea levels
⬇ Record low glacier mass
1/18
2021 was a bit cooler than the last few years due to a moderate La Nina event. La Nina tends to result in cooler temps globally, though the global response tends to lag 3-4 months after peak conditions. Here is what global temps look like since 1970 with and without ENSO removed:
The years since 2015 – 2021 included – are quite a bit warmer than any years that came before. Barring a Pinatubo-sized eruption in the next few years, its exceedingly unlikely we will ever see a year as cool as 2014 again:
Land temperatures – where we all live – are warming 40% faster than the world as a whole (which is mostly oceans). The world's land has warmed by around 1.8C already since preindustrial times:
Areas home to 1.8 billion people saw their warmest year on record during 2021, with 25 countries – including China, South Korea, Bangladesh and Nigeria – setting all-time annual temperature records. No parts of the world set cold records for the year.
2021 saw the warmest summer (N Hem summer – June, July, August) on record for the world's land areas:
These high temperatures – and the long-term warming trend – contributed to a number of extreme events both in the summer and across the year: carbonbrief.org/guest-post-rev…
Checking in on climate model projections (from the CMIP5 models that provide future projections after 2005), temperatures are pretty well-in-line with what models think they should be:
Note that I'm not featuring a comparison with CMIP6 models; they are less well suited to a multimodel mean approach given a subset of high-sensitivity outliers. The new assessed warming ranges (which downweight too-warm models) in the AR6 only start in 2015 making comparison hard
In the lower troposhere we saw 2021 as the 6th warmest (RSS) or 8th warmest (UAH) year on record. Note that the troposhere tends to see a larger influence of La Nina and El Nino events than the surface.
The stratosphere continues to see cooling temperatures. This is a clear fingerprint of climate change from greenhouse gases, which warm the lower part of the atmosphere by trapping heat while cooling the upper atmosphere as less heat escapes.
We saw record high sea levels in 2021. Global sea levels have risen by around 0.2 metres (200mm) since 1900, and there is evidence of accelerating sea level rise over the post-1993 period when high-quality satellite altimetry data is available.
The figure below shows the change in global average glacier mass from 1950 through to the end of 2020 (2021 values are not yet available). We see consistent loss of ice mass associated with warming temperatures:
Greenhouse gas concentrations reached a new high in 2021, driven by human emissions from fossil fuels, land use and agriculture. Methane concentrations in particular have seen a sharp rise over the past decade after a plateau in the 2000s.
Arctic sea ice was at the low end of the historical (1979-2010) range for most of 2021, but saw few new all-time daily low records set outside of brief periods in February and July. The summer minimum extent was the 12th lowest since records began in the late 1970s.
Finally, we can use current conditions (and El Nino/La Nina forecasts) to estimate where temperatures will end up in 2022. Four different groups (including a new @CarbonBrief estimate) have projections for 2022, and the differ a fair bit!
Our projection and that of the @metoffice has 2022 looking pretty similar to 2021, driven down a bit by the current "double dip" La Nina event. @BerkeleyEarth has it in the middle, while @ClimateOfGavin has 2022 threatening to top 2016 and 2020 as warmest year on record. 18/18
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many countries have adopted net-zero commitments later this century. In most cases these apply to all GHGs, not just CO2, and are structured using 100-year global warming potentials (GWP-100).
It turns out this choice effectively commits countries to a lot of carbon removal. 1/
If you add together different GHGs using GWP-100 it does a pretty poor job of simulating actual warming. It conflates flow pollutants (like CH4) with stock pollutants (like CO2) in ways that are unhelpful, as I discussed last year in this thread:
While we can get close to zero CO2 emissions (at least in theory), it will be much harder to remove all the CH4 and N2O emissions from agriculture. This means that a zero-GHG target is actually a negative-CO2 target, where CO2 removal is balancing out remaining CH4 and N2O.
The Tonga eruption yesterday appears to be one of the largest volcanic events we have seen in decades.
We do not know how much cooling SO2 it has put in the stratosphere (data will come in later today), but this is the effect a Pinatubo-sized volcano would have on temps today:
That being said, we have no particular reason to think that this eruption will be Pinatubo-sized in terms of its stratospheric SO2 injection. That will depend on how much SO2 was released for how long how high in the stratosphere. We will know more in a day, so watch this space!
Scientists get excited about these sort of events because they can serve as natural climate experiments, but we should not lose sight of the real suffering on the ground that this event (and the resulting tsunami) have caused for people in Tonga and the surrounding regions.
Ocean heat content is our best measure of the impact of human activity on the climate; >90% of all heat trapped by greenhouse gases is absorbed by the oceans.
In 2021, we saw the warmest ocean heat content since records began, >400 billion trillion joules higher than the 1940s.
This is from the newly released dataset by @Lijing_Cheng and the Institute for Atmospheric Physics, though NOAA's ocean heat content record shows similar results: link.springer.com/article/10.100…
For more details on surface and atmospheric temperatures, ocean heat, sea level rise, atmospheric GHGs, sea ice, and other climate indicators in 2021 see our @CarbonBrief state of the climate analysis coming out in the next few days.
I'm used to foolish and misguided attempts at blaming climate scientists for society not having effectively dealt with climate change.
But suggesting that a solution is for climate scientists to strike and stop doing science is a supernova of stupid: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
I'm sure politicians will finally get on to putting effective climate policy into place if only they didn't have those pesky IPCC reports warning them of the dire risks of inaction...
I'm also sure that all of the climate scientists who are not old tenured white dudes would also love the career advancement that comes from refusing to do work...
El Nino and La Nina (ENSO) are main drivers of year-to-year variability in global temperatures, on top of the long-term human-caused warming trend.
Here is what happens if we use statistics (following @rahmstorf and Forster 2011) to remove their effects from @CopernicusECMWF:
And here is what the recorded temperatures (red) look like compared to these ENSO-removed variants:
Its interesting (and somewhat coincidental) that 2021 still ends up as the 5th warmest year even when ENSO effects are removed, but its much closer to the past few years, and the long-term warming trend even clearer without ENSO.
With 2021 annual temperatures (nearly) in, its time for my first prediction of where 2022 will end up!
I find that 2022 is most likely to be the 6th warmest on record, with a very small chance of being the warmest year on record and a small chance of below the 8th warmest.
This uses GISTEMP, and is based on a multivariate regression model using the prior year, past three months, and El Nino/La Nina (ENSO) conditions for the past 6 months and the ENSO forecast for the next 6 months. Here is how it does for past years (red forecast, blue actual):
Note that I'm estimating December 2021 temperature for GISTEMP for this analysis based on the difference between November 2021 and December 2021 temperatures in ERA5 (which has already reported its December numbers).