#PlantScienceClassics #13: Floral Dip. Almost 25 years ago, in 1998, Steven Clough & Andrew Bent published their geniously simple Arabidopsis transformation protocol @ThePlantJournal: Dipping a plant upside down into Agrobacterium solution - et voilà! doi.org/10.1046/j.1365…
I have covered the plant transformation backstory in Classic#6, the T-DNA, so here I will focus on the events after 1983, the year plant transformation was established. These first transformants all were plants regenerated from cultured cells as calli.
Simply transforming an adult plant was not yet possible. One of the prerequisite toward this aim was the acceptance of Arabidopsis thaliana as a model plant (see also Classic#4), and the demonstration that A. thaliana was transformable via Agrobacterium.
The Monsanto lab & @RobbFraley were already involved in the race toward the first transgenic plant (1977-1983), & in 1986 they added a @ScienceMagazine paper showing that A. thaliana could indeed be transformed by Agrobacterium, regenerating transgenic plants from leaf discs.
So the first Arabidopsis transformants were still obtained via regeneration. A first change to this laborious technique came in 1987 at the hands of Kenneth Feldmann & David Marks, who co-cultured germinating Arabidopsis seeds with Agrobacteria, obtaining transformed plants.
But the next major improvement came in 1993, exactly a decade after the first transgenic plants were created, when Nicole Bechtold, Jeff Ellis & Georges Pelletier @INRAE_Intl /@CSIRO published their vacuum infiltration method to transform adult plants.
They also used the GUS-reporter (Classic#11), expressed from the CaMV35S promoter (Classic#9) in their experiments, demonstrating successful transformation via GUS staining of flowers & roots by vacuum infiltration of the GUS-substrate 8 days after Agrobacteria infiltration.
The vacuum-infiltration method meant a giant leap forward, both in enhancing transformation efficiency & reducing labor. However, the plants still had to be uprooted from the soil, & everybody using the method at the time can testify that the vacuum could make things messy.
The 1998 Floral Dip paper got rid of these last problems. Clough & Bent showed that simply dipping the above-ground part of the plant upside down into Agrobacterium solution, keeping them in a humid environment & repeating this after 5 days had great transformation efficiencies!
Floral dip remains the most widely used transformation protocol for Arabidopsis, easily exemplified by the number of citations it has accumulated (despite too many authors not even citing it in their method sections). It is now one of the most cited plant science papers.
Finally, in 2006, Elke Logemann & colleagues @mpipz_cologne showed that it is not even necessary to grow a large Agrobacterium liquid culture for floral dip to work, but that it’s sufficient to scrape a bacterial carpet from a petri dish, dissolve in medium & dip the plants.
Of course, this ease of transformation is restricted to Arabidopsis, and other plants still need to go through cell culturing and tissue regeneration, but this just proves again how important the adoption of Arabidopsis thaliana as a universal plant model has been in the 1980s.
Further reading about plant transformation can be found here:
A Short History of Plant Transformation peerj.com/preprints/2755…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ethylene is a gaseous #phytohormone with a wide range of roles from plant development to immunity. Ernest Starling in 1905 defined a hormone as mobile chemical messenger synthesized by a multicellular organism, that has physiological activity distant from the site of synthesis.
The effect of ethylene on plants was first noted in the 1900s, when it leaked from illumination gas used in lamps and affected plants nearby. But it was Dimitry Neljubow, who in a series of experiments identified ethlyene as the active substance in the illumination gas in 1905.
#PlantScienceClassics #17: The Mildew Resistance Locus O (MLO). 80 years ago Rudolf Freisleben & Alfred Lein created the first powdery mildew resistant barley plant. 30yrs ago the gene was mapped, 25yrs ago cloned-yet it's mode of action remains a mystery. doi.org/10.1007/BF0148…
Powdery mildew is a fungal disease of many crop plants, most prominently maybe barley and wheat, where outbreaks can reduce grain quality & yield, and ruin complete harvests. Visible are the fluffy patches formed by the fungus (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei).
Freisleben used radiation-induced mutagenesis to create the barley 𝘮𝘭𝘰 mutant, which showed full resistant to this pathogen. A massive agricultural breakthrough!
See also Classic #2, to read about how Emmy Stein has developed this technique in 1921:
#PlantScienceClassics #16: A linkage map of Arabidopsis thaliana. In 1983 the legendary Maarten Koornneef published a genetic map of A. thaliana, the basis for genetic work & an important contribution towards the acceptance of Arabidopsis as plant model. doi.org/10.1093/oxford…
In the early 1980s scientists finally adopted A. thaliana as model plant. At this point, several mutants were available, but their positions in the genome were mostly unknown. This was years before genome sequences became available,&genetic maps were still based on recombination.
Arabidopsis pioneer György Rédei did linkage analyses with 14 loci in the 1960s, but his genetic map from 1965 suggested 6 linkage groups – 1 more than chromosomes. Curiously, A. D. McKelvie created another map in parallel - & found 4 groups, 1 less than chromosomes.
#PlantScienceClassics #15 #PlantScienceFails #1: The auxin-independent (axi) Nicotiana tabacum lines. In 1992 Richard Walden et al. (specifically co-worker Inge Czaja) published activation-tagged axi protoplasts @ScienceMagazine that could divide&grow in the absence of any auxin!
The development of plant transformation in the early 1980s (classics #6&13) was inspirational for many scientists. Among them was Richard Walden, who teamed up with plant transformation pioneers Barbara & Thomas Hohn to leverage this advance to develop the “Agroinfection" method.
He then joined the next transformation pioneer, Jeff Schell, to develop more such tools. Their first was Activation-Tagging: 4 CaMV 35S enhancers (classic#9) were placed at the RB of the T-DNA. That way, they would overexpress the plant gene next to which the T-DNA was inserted.
#PlantScienceClassics #14: Mendelian inheritance. In 1866 Gregor Mendel published his work on dominant/recessive trait inheritance in peas, establishing the hereditary rules on which modern genetics is based. But nobody cared,& his scientific career ended. biodiversitylibrary.org/page/48299076
Mendel had always been interested in nature, and grew/kept and observed plants and bees in his parent’s garden. He later decided to become a monk and teacher. However, he failed teacher’s exam in 1850 & 1856, & eventually settled on being a monk and substitute teacher.
He satisfied his curiosity as a naturalist by keeping and observing plants and bees in the monastery garden, and eventually became interested in how traits are determined through generations. So he started to conduct crossing experiments with mice with grey or white fur.
Do you know Daisy Roulland-Dussoix? She is one of the discoverers of restriction enzymes, who’s findings paved the way for the development of recombinant DNA and cloning technologies. Accordingly, the finding was rewarded with a #NobelPrize. But the prize didn’t go to her... 🧵👇
Daisy Roulland-Dussoix worked with Werner Arber to study the mechanism for the observed host-specificity of λ Phages. It was known from an important 1953 paper (Bertani & Weigle) that phages, that had replicated in a certain E. coli strain, could only re-infect the same strain.
Roulland-Dussoix & Arber showed that host-specificity is linked with the phage’s DNA. Using phages carrying radiolabeled DNA, they showed that progeny with 2 parental DNA strands retained specificity, while progeny with newly synthesized daughter strands could adapt to new hosts.