Like at some point we’re going to have to talk about the talent of the actors who made Whedon’s dialogue in a lot of his shows entertaining rather than just hours of insufferable
Like I read a lot of screenplays, and one thing that always fascinates me is how often Whedon’s characters read really different from how they come across on screen
It’s similar to Sorkin, in a way, although I’m put off less by Sorkin on the page and more just bored.
They both write patter, and while I don’t want to undersell the role of the writer in writing patter that works, it lives or does in delivery.
There’s plenty to not like about the character of Mal, for example, but a lot of people describe *realizing* that Mal is not all that likable.
As in, they didn’t realize it at first.
And that’s because Nathan Fillion’s line readings slip under your defenses and turn something that on paper is just mean into something that’s self-deprecating or vulnerable or wounded or wry or full of weltschmerz.
And Whedon is different from Sorkin here, for all that they both rely on speedy delivery to sell a lot of their lines.
With Sorkin you can see actors he hasn’t worked with as much learning to speak Sorkinese.
Sorkin has sort of a standard rhythm and music in which his patter works.
Like I feel like I could almost do Sorkin patter with nonsense syllables and it would be recognizable.
And if an actor doesn’t use it, they can come across as stiff or awkward.
You can see it if you watch Sorkin movies with big-name actors. Not all of them have quite gotten how to deliver a Sorkin line—even some really good actors.
And it comes across as a little stage-y.
As opposed to the West Wing cast, who don’t usually feel like they’re delivering memorized lines.
It’s not because they’re better actors.
In fact, I suspect that big name actors sometimes can’t make Sorkinese feel lived-in precisely BECAUSE…
…they’re accustomed to more autonomy in how to deliver lines.
But for the most part, if you don’t get the pattern, it just comes off as stiff, not *mean.*
Whedon is different. His patter isn’t as formulaic in rhythm and the music of the line.
But it really took reading the lines on a page to realize how much the delivery was selling the lines, and not just in terms of comic timing or back-and-forth.
These characters are just waaaay less likable on the page.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I also think the tendency to demonize Jews this way stems from dissonance within Christian thought about how to view Jesus’s teachings. They’re trying to have it both ways:
-Jesus’s teachings are simple and self-evidently true
So on one hand, if Jesus’s teachings are simple teachings about compassion and they’re self-evident if you think about them and they all just boil down to the Golden Rule, you’d have to be either incredibly stupid or incredibly evil not to agree with them.
The problem with that, of course, is basic compassion and the golden rule are hardly unique to Jesus. So if you reduce it that much, he has nothing substantive to say.
1) cheering on gunmen attacking US synagogues actually feeds INTO Israeli propaganda that they're the only safe place for Jews, so if your anti-Zionism doesn't include making the diaspora safer for Jews, it's not really about Palestinian rights
and just another gentle reminder that:
2) American Christians are FAR more likely to unquestioningly support the actions of Israel than American Jews, so if the only Zionism you focus on is what you *assume* is coming from Jews, helping Palestinians is probably not your priority
-oh, the Pharisees have a problem with Jesus healing on Shabbat? they value following a meaningless religious law over saving someone's life
OR
-they value following a meaningless religious law over alleviating suffering
And Jewish pushback on this story has generally focused on pikuach nefesh, the principle that almost any Jewish law can be trumped by the need to save a life.
the $150,000 security costs he's talking about are I think, roughly the same as our total operating budget, most of which goes to rent and the rabbi's salary
smaller synagogues often don't own buildings and can't institute permanent security measures like these
late this summer, when we'd all been vaxxed and it looked like maybe COVID was winding down, for a few weeks we met in the courtyard
I sat on the steps up to the second floor in a sundress
the neighborhood could hear us singing
Even if we had all those security measures and closed and locked our doors during services, I think if someone came to the door and said they needed shelter, we would let them in