The question is how to make the public "understand."

We live in an age of disinformation. Lots of people watch Fox News and believe what they see.

There are a few ways I think about this.

First, who out there hasn't already formed an opinion about what happened on Jan. 6?

1/
On one hand, I believe that direct evidence will come out making it hard to deny that Trump committed crimes.

On the other hand, the Republicans have long seen lawbreaking as a badge of honor.

They glorify lawbreaking . . .

2/ Image
There is a fantasy that indictments will create a huge change in how people vote. I don't think that.

Can you imagine these guys saying, "Trump got indicted! Oh no! He's in big trouble! We should fold up shop and learn to love liberal democracy."

I don't think so.

3/ Image
I've talked elsewhere about why Republicans glorify lawbreaking: They don't think the laws should exist. They want to go back to the days before the New Deal and before the Civil Rights movement when there were very few limitations on what white men could do.

4/
On the frontier, they could grab land.

Before sexual harassment and other laws, they could grab women. For much of our history, rape was a property crime. Rape laws were intended to protect [white] men from false accusations. They weren't there to protect women from attack.

5/
Women were expected to guard the goods. Don't get me started on the history of rape laws (even though I already sort of got started 🤣)

Before the new deal and regulatory agencies, white men could fix prices, manipulate markets, launder money, etc.

6/
Trump and pals will spin any indictments or convictions as political prosecution and their followers will believe it.

Another way to see it is that things that seem obvious to us are not obvious to others.

7/
Susan B. Anthony had a difficult time persuading people, including women, that women should have equal rights.

It should be obvious that the party responsible for the insurrection and who is now shielding the insurrectionists should be driven to power.

8/
So how do we make the public understand?

It's hard. It was hard for abolitionists to get rid of slavery. It was hard for women to get the right to vote.

I think there is a strong pull toward autocracy (slavery and Jim Crow were forms of autocracy).

9/
I think a lot of people don't want to put in the work necessary to create a democracy. They want magic bullets and there aren't any.

The only solution I can see is constantly working to turn out the voters who want democracy to survive.

10/
That could be enough, but it only happens with a lot of work.

I see the crime spree of the Trump era as a political problem AND a law enforcement problem.



11/
I think that the select committee primetime hearings are likely to be more effective than trials.

Real-life trials are not like in the movies. They can be frustrating and harrowing and often don't come out as we like.

Juries are unpredictable.



12/
I'm not sure screaming from the rooftops is the answer to people who just don't get it. They're likely to think we are chicken littles.

For people who don't get it, it seems to me that 🤔 is more effective than 🔥.

Here's the thing . . .

13/

I've never lived in an autocracy, but my husband and his family experienced the Pinochet dictatorship, so I can report second hand:

Your life goes on basically. You get up, have your coffee, go to work.

But, If you get into trouble, you get no help from the government.

14/
In an autocracy, the government isn't there to help you.

But today in the US, most people don't understand how much help they get from the government and how much they rely on public agencies designed to promote the public interest.

15/
Agree ⤵️ In an autocracy, you have to be careful with what you say. You can't offend those in power.

But a lot of these things, non-political people don't notice in their daily lives.

And there was rampant corruption throughout a lot of US history.

16/
. . .corruption in the sense that in the 19th century, the wealthiest people were slaveowners who controlled all three branches of government and passed laws to benefit themselves.

Corruption in the sense that fixing prices wasn't illegal.
Consumer protection laws are new.

17/
Begin rant.

The criminal justice system doesn't exist to give people "faith."

Punishment is pain inflicted by the state.

It's serious and somber. Treat it respectfully. It's not a circus.

Nobody should need to see people punished to give them "faith."

Rant over. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Jan 20
It's just easier to destroy rule of law than to preserve it.

It's easier to dismantle a government than to use government to improve the lives of the people, particularly when another party is trying to dismantle the government.

That's why Republicans have the easier task.
Huge advantage: Right-wing authoritarians fall in line. They prefer to move in lockstep.

On the other hand, if you want to move forward and improve people's lives, there are lots of different paths and people disagree on how to best move forward.
A lot of Americans don't think the purpose of government is to help people.

When I was a public appellate defender, someone told me, "My tax dollars shouldn't pay for a poor person's defense."

(I was horrified by the kind of world he wanted to live in)
Read 5 tweets
Jan 19
Here we have the Supreme Court's response to Trump's executive privilege appeal.

This is not a good day for Donald Trump.

Look's like the Trump White House docs are going to the Jan. 6th select committee.

documentcloud.org/documents/2118…

1/
I would have been shocked if they took it. This is a blow to all the Trump allies saying they don't have to comply with the select committee because of executive privilege.

Trump can try again with future tranches of docs -- if he enjoys losing 🤣.

2/

Trump tried to argue that his appeal raised serious constitutional issues.

SCOTUS wasn't buying it.

Remember, this was an appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction.

In fact, Trump failed to show why he should get a preliminary injunction.

3/ Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 19
Well.

Letitia James filed a motion to compel Trump, Jr., and Ivanka to comply with her earlier subpoenas.

She wants a court order forcing them to comply and to turn over documents.

The Trumps have legal troubles left and right.

The motion is here: ag.ny.gov/sites/default/…
Short version: The Trumps are liars and cheaters.

This should matter. Trump came to power on two lies
🔹"I'm a successful businessman" positioning him as a strongman and winner, and
🔹Birtherism, signaling that he was a white supremacist tapping into white grievance.

1/
Back when I was naive (2015) I thought it would matter if his base had to grapple with the fact that he wasn't successful: He inherited wealth and then cheated and swindled.

Now I'm afraid lie #2 Birtherism matters more and brazen lying and cheating is part of his appeal.

2/
Read 14 tweets
Jan 18
But . . but . . . I was absolutely assured that the DOJ is not investigating Trump.

My position has been: I'll take Merrick Garland at his word because I have no reason not to, and Garland said the DOJ is working its way up and following the facts.

s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2118…
There is no ticking clock. That's an invented thing.

There is nothing for me to be "right" about.

I promise no results.

I'm simply repeating what Garland said because I have no reason to think he's lying or conducting this investigation incompetently.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 16
This is where I trip up.

Nobody really thought that those forged electoral certificates would have "fooled" anyone at the National Archives.

Suppose Pence had declared Trump the winner, what then?

Would a few hundred million Americas just say, okay cool?

1/
But how would that work? Who would make up the two armies?

One side would be the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and other white power militia groups.

They couldn't win unless the US military joined them, so really, it would be a military coup.



2/
But under the insurrection act, the military would still have to be willing to keep Trump in power beyond January 20, the date, under the constitution, his presidency ends . . .

. . . which would make it a military coup.

3/
Read 33 tweets
Jan 15
High up on my to-do list for saving democracy is to get involved with local politics including school boards.

The way to save democracy is with more democracy, including more civic engagement.

It's a lot of work.

Need ideas? See my to-do list:
terikanefield.com/things-to-do/
People have the idea that indictments of political figures will save democracy.

I've written about what's wrong with that idea. See, for example⤵️ (there is a transcript on my blog).

The idea that there is a magic bullet is also sort of lazy.
I live in a blue town in a blue state (in a sea of pink). The right-wing is very energetically vying for control over the local school board and local government.

Meanwhile, other people have the idea that if Trump gets indicted the right-wing will crumble . . . so they wait.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(