Thread by @WomaninHavana

Starmer enjoying this. And that was a very good, crystal clear question.

“Sue Gray” is not any answer.

This is brilliant by Starmer.

Short, sharp questions to which the answer is never - in any plausible or appropriate way - “Sue Gray”.

“What’s the government offering? Nothing. Too distracted by their own chaos to do their job.”

Starmer nails this.

Incisive, personable, and even quite funny.

I would hope @FullFact or similar fact checks the claims and statistics put forward by the PM. It’s not on for this to keep happening, unchecked.

Here’s one example on Johnson’s (oft repeated) claim on the building of 40 new hospitals.

bbc.co.uk/news/59372348

Could anyone send a link to the terms of reference for Sue Gray’s internal report please?

Have they been properly published anywhere?

And do they contain a transparency commitment that the entirety of the report be published upon conclusion?

https://twitter.com/womaninhavana/status/1482094687158734853

Here are the terms of reference for Sue Gray’s report, as published. H/t @GAVClaw

No matter how much the PM & govt repeat the mantra “Sue Gray”, this is an internal report that cannot and should not bear the weight of establishing what is now required.

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

And here’s another of Johnson’s claims in PMQs debunked.

https://twitter.com/PhilipJCollins1/status/1483774105610506246