Furin cleavage site data and discussion included. Identical sequence stretch on S. cerevisiae chromosome XIII identified and suggested as potential recombination donor for the furin site insert in the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein
3. Revised version 3 includes new data regarding the origin of the unusual FCS in SARS-CoV-2. Indeed, with these new data & evidence, it suggests that this critical site is the product of a recombination event after synthetic passage in genetically manipulated S. cerevisiae cells
4. . Overall, the research presented in this article now provides strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has an origin in synthetic yeast, and as such is not a product of natural evolution alone.
5. Highlighted Revisions - 1
"At this junction, we detect a highly specific stretch of yeast DNA encoding for the critical furin cleavage site insert PRRA, which has not been seen in other lineage b betacoronaviruses"
6. Highlighted Revisions - 2
"Our data specifically allow the identification of
the yeast S. cerevisiae as a potential recombination donor for the critical furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2"
7. Highlighted Revisions - 3
"Of special interest in this analysis was a 16 base sequence TTCTCCTCGGCGGGCA near P2 between position 23599 & 23614, which corresponded to the furin cleavage site & identically aligned with bases [810386..810401] from S. cerevisiae chromosome XIII"
8. Highlighted Revisions - 4
"Yeast (S. cerevisiae) standardized BLAT z-scores representing the relative homology signal from all alignment scores in 13 representative SARS-related coronaviruses"
Note that only, SARS-COV 1, SARS -COV 2 and RaTG13 show Yeast anomalies.
9. Highlighted Revisions - 5
"According to our data, this cleavage site is specifically compatible with a recombination event including chromosome XIII of S. cerevisiae, which shares a unique nucleotide sequence that encodes
the necessary insert PRRA"
10. Any questions?
Corresponding author: Andreas Martin Lisewski
a.lisewski@jacobs-university.de
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.
1. A truly stunning example of what is called an "ad hoc hypothesis", i.e. a secondary hypothesis added to a theory specifically to save it from being falsified when evidence for its original version is missing or contradictory.
2. They used a modeling framework called RELAX to claim that viruses like SARSCoV2 may already have the ability to infect humans whilst in their natural reservoir, meaning an intermediate host or long-term adaptation wouldn't leave the evolutionary footprints previously expected.
3. A classic post hoc justification for the absence of physical evidence by grant stuffed criminals, in short:
I couldn't find the evidence I said was required, so I've invented a theory that explains why the evidence I failed to find was never actually needed in the first place
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.
1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED
"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."
"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.