Three doses of vaccine protects healthy people reasonably well against Omicron. The critical question is: how well will vaccines protect the most vulnerable? Here we look at a correlate of vaccine efficacy in a vulnerable group. @TheLancet with @EdjCarr. thelancet.com/journals/lance…
2/n We report authentic live virus neutralisation (best correlate of vaccine efficacy) of Omicron & Delta by haemodialysis (HD) patients after 3rd doses of BNT162b2.
Funding @Kidney_Research@NKF_UK@PKDCharity@KidneyWales
Thanks to patients taking part & @ukkidney colleagues.
4/n HD vaccine responses are attenuated. We showed in August 2021: median neutralising antibody titres against Delta after two ChAdOx-1 were <40 [less than range of our assay] in HD patients without prior infection. thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Tweetorial:
We used live virus microneutralisation assays - developed by @MaryYiWeiWu@DrUlferts Ruth Harvey & Mike Howell - to assess titres before and after dose 3 (median 27days post) 98 patients, 50 sera after dose 3.
8/n We found that a dose of BNT162b2 after ChAdOx/ChAdOx or BNT162b2/BNT162b2 increased titres against Delta, likely above the correlate of protection.
9/n Looking at Omicron titres, we found that three doses of BNT162b2 induced neutralising antibodies to a median ~256. For ChAdOx/ChAdOx/BNT162b2 that induction was modest, with a median <40.
10/n Caveat: this is an observational study and the ChAdOx/ChAdOx/BNT162b2 recipients are ~10 years older than the BNT162b2/BNT162b2/BNT162b2.
11/n Some HD patients are immunosuppressed - eg failed renal transplants, or for ongoing autoimmune disease. Excluding immunosuppressed patients from the analysis improved both responses (details in the paper).
12/n In the UK, HD patients are offered 3 doses. A small group - who are immunosuppressed - are already eligible for 4 doses. Our data suggests that eligibility might need to widen.
2/n Context-1: Haemodialysis [HD] patients respond poorly to traditional vaccines.
Hepatitis B vaccine is reformulated
Pneumococcal boosters are recommended
Influenza vaccine responses are attenuated
Context-2: HD patients either excluded from Phase III trials, or not reported.
3/n Context-3: HD patients clinically vulnerable: CFR ~25% in first wave.
Context-4: HD patients could not shield. They had to come to hospital 3x / week for HD.
Can regular testing help with reducing the spread of Covid? Yes it definitely can, in the right context. It's not a panacea, but with education and other sectors of the economy opening up before we are fully vaccinated it's vital we try to make this work. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-566320…
First, the basics. You will never detect infection in the first day or two after exposure. Then the viral load goes up massively, then – after that – symptoms start. The idea behind these programmes is to detect cases before symptoms start, and to detect asymptomatic cases.
3/n This illustration from @michaelmina_lab shows how this can take place. You could use a high sensitivity PCR test, or a lower sensitivity lateral flow test.
Right Twitter, it's been a dreadful 2020 and the first half of 2021 isn't looking too clever either. For no other reason than hubris, I wish to bestow my own awards for best Pandemic tweeting of 2020. These are of course entirely worthless, being based purely on my own bias.
Next we have a much easier category: opponent of the pandemic. Very easy, this is @BallouxFrancois. Often wrong, but never because he distorted the evidence to suit his own agenda.
This is a paper born of adversity, and contains two really important and unexpected findings. When the pandemic hit London hard – very hard – we had minimal diagnostic capacity. Our main focus was the critically important qPCR pipeline for diagnosing active infection,
3/n but George’s lab and with @RealMcCoyLab and @eleni_nastouli and colleagues at UCLH took on the task of developing diagnostic serology. One very annoying aspect of this is that there is some cross-reactivity between previous seasonal coronavirus infection and SARS-CoV-2.