1.Ignorant to pass off India Gate & the names inscribed as merely `a symbol of our colonial past.' More than 74,000 Indians were killed in WW-1, one of the largest volunteer forces in history. The legacy of the Indian Army, one of the greatest anywhere, stems from its past.
2. The bedrock of the Indian Army are its traditions. Its regiments have a strong colonial past - they are seeped in tradition. To ignore that past, & to simplify this proud legacy to Indians in WW-1 having fought `someone else's war' is crude revisionism.
3. Generations of Indians - officers and men - have followed in the footsteps of their forefathers - men who fought in the Great Wars. They were inspired by the stories of these men and their valour.
4. Scores of Indians continue to be honoured in the areas where they fought, including in France and Belgium, where they faced mustard gas attacks, among the first instances of chemical warfare in military history.
5. In 2015, Prime Minister Modi visited France where Indians had fought so very bravely. He honoured the memory of these men. Why is the govt today passing off this legacy as being that of someone else?
6. Never, ever forget about the role of Indians in World War 1 . History cannot just be erased because you decide it doesn't work for you any more. See this old @ndtv report ... ndtv.com/video/news/new…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. India's fight against fascism in WW-2 was a battle against a genocidal force that represented the greatest evil known to humanity. The cause was an international one in which 87,000+ Indians were killed in an effort endorsed by our freedom fighters.
2. India fielded the largest volunteer force in history - men who returned 4000 war decorations and 18 Victoria Crosses for gallantry. To simply refer to these men as cannon fodder without looking at their spectacular military successes is unfair.
3. Feeling nostalgic about military traditions that have defined the Indian Army for generations is NOT synonymous with justifying colonialism. History is not always black and white. One needs to accept its strands. Doing so doesn't make us weaker.
1/4 [Thread with images] Putting images of the new Chinese bridge across the Pangong through some filters/adjustments. First, the original images. 📸: @Maxar
1. SOURCES: Chopper crash of Gen Bipin Rawat was the result of Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) in cloudy weather conditions. (CFIT is defined in aviation as being caused by pilot error.) IATA definition in next tweet:
2. IATA (International Air Transport Association) - CFIT refers to accidents in which there was an in-flight collision with terrain, water, or obstacle, without indication of loss of control. (MORE)
3. IATA: The critical distinction in these types of accidents is the fact that the aircraft is under the control of the flight crew.
1. THREAD: Multiple reports, with fragments of detail on the CDS chopper crash, skirt the possibility of pilot error. This report says ''CFIT [Controlled Flight into Terrain] means the helicopter was airworthy and the pilot was not at fault.'' Really? indianexpress.com/article/india/…
2. - How exactly do you fly into terrain in a controlled manner without there being gross pilot error? Why would any pilot get into this situation at all? Its crucial for the @IAF_MCC to be transparent about what happened.
3. Aviators will tell you there is hardly ever a single cause of a crash. Crashes happen for multiple reasons - Here's what I would like to know ...
1. The Vikramaditya and presumably the Vikrant are fitted with a host of very specific, closed-looping landing and navigation aids specific to the MiG-29K aircraft. This includes the LUNA optical landing system.
2. The Russian Resistor-E air-traffic control system is interfaced with the MiG-29K and provides landing and navigation to just 30 metres short of flight deck. Again, I assume this would be the basis of MiG ops on the Vikrant.
3. I don't think the elevator is a problem - there wouldn't be prospective trials if that were the case. Would be interesting to see what the load-out of a Rafale-M would be for operations on a ski-jump off Viraat.