🧵 Someone recently said to me they would have guessed that I was previously a public defender, rather than a prosecutor. I had some other commenters this week suggest that I just don’t want to see crime punished.

So I thought it might help to elaborate on my background.

/1
I spent nearly a decade as a federal prosecutor, fighting crime in my community at a small fraction of the pay I could have made in private practice.

People sit in prison, including on federal death row, this very minute because of my prior work as a prosecutor.

/2
You can lecture me about not caring about crime victims after you’ve prosecuted a capital murder case.

You can tell me I’m soft on crime after you’ve put child pornographers, bank robbers, drug dealers, tax cheats, embezzlers, fraudsters, & ponzi-schemers in prison.

/3
I take a back seat to no one in my commitment to justice for crime victims.

But I’m equally committed to justice for those accused of crimes.

Punishing those who break the law doesn’t have to be inconsistent with also doing justice to those accused of crimes.

/4
But too often it is.

Too many prosecutors have lost their moral compass and believe that enforcing the law is the same thing as doing justice. It’s not.

The criminal justice system in America is deeply unjust. I want my fellow citizens to understand why and how that’s so.

/5
I want people to understand that our system preys on the poor. I want people to know that our system, even today, intentionally discriminates on the basis of race. I want others to appreciate how the system denies people due process, which generates false convictions.

/6
I want people to realize that sending someone to prison means putting them in a situation where they will all too likely be raped. And nobody cares.

*And* I want folks to know what an abysmal job our system does at both solving and preventing crimes.

/7
Our criminal justice system isn’t just. It’s not just for crime victims. It’s not just for the criminally accused. And I want to see that change. All of it.

I want us to do better. Because we can do better.

/8
We must do more justly. The Bible tells me so.

/end
P.S. You can hear more of my thoughts here:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthew Martens

Matthew Martens Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @martensmatt1

Jan 20
One of my tweets yesterday suggested that, to be biblical, we should frame justice in terms of love for neighbor rather than war on neighbor.

A few of the responses were of the "Why do you hate babies?" variety, or, in this instance, "Why don't you want to punish people?"
/1
These responses reflect the mindset that I was trying to get at, namely a view of justice that sees love as inconsistent with it.

First, I agree that punishing a perpetrator can be an act of love.

But, not all punishment of even a guilty party is loving.
/2
It's neither loving nor just to punish a guilty person without first affording them due process.

It's neither loving nor just to punish even a person disproportionately to the seriousness of the offense.
/3
Read 5 tweets
Jan 20
Bail funds for the poor: 🧵

As I explained in this prior thread, when judges impose bail amounts on the poor that they cannot pay, it creates incredible pressure on poor defendants to plead guilty regardless of their guilt.
/1
One of the solutions to this injustice was the establishment charitable bail organizations. In short, these organizations pay the bail for an indigent defendants so that he can remain free prior to trial (they are presumed innocent, after all) while he builds his defense.
/2
And because the defendant is not in jail before trial, the coercive pressure on the defendant to plead guilty is lessened, forcing the prosecutors to prove their cases at trial instead.

Not surprisingly, prosecutor and police don’t like these charitable bail organizations.
/3
Read 4 tweets
Nov 9, 2021
Everyone should be outraged by modern-day plea bargaining: 🧵

In a plea bargain, the defendant “agrees” to pleading guilty in return for a sentence that, typically, is dramatically lower than what he would get under the law if he was convicted after trial.

/1
If the much longer sentences handed out after trial are just, then you should be outraged that in 90+% of cases, the defendant gets off with a much lighter (and thus unjust) sentence.

/2
If the much longer sentences handed out after trial are unjust, then you should be outraged that the threat of an unjustly long sentence after trial is used as a threat that coerces people (some of them innocent) into waiving their constitutional right to a trial.

/3
Read 4 tweets
Nov 7, 2021
I loved this sentence from @CBHessick’s new book:

“Today, @shonhopwood is a law professor. But he used to be a bank robber.”

“Used to be.” Because we don’t have to be defined forever by our worst acts.
“I introduce myself the same way whenever I'm asked to speak-paid speaking events, Rotary clubs, churches, before the president and senators. I say, My name is Shon Hopwood… I committed a violent crime, but I am not a violent criminal,'" Shon recounted.
It's an effective introduction, Shon explained, because it introduces people to the idea that someone could commit a violent crime because he is at a certain stage in his life….
Read 4 tweets
Nov 7, 2021
Imagine this: 🧵

You’re arrested in a case of mistaken identity for shoplifting a small quantity of goods at a local store.

After your arrest, you make a brief court appearance where your bail is set at $2,500.

/1
Because you’re in the bottom 40% of income earners in the US (who, on average have a savings of $2,100), you can’t make bail. So off to jail for you to await trial.

After sitting in jail for a week in unspeakable conditions, the prosecutor offers you a deal:

/2
You can plead guilty (to a crime you didn’t commit) and be out of jail tomorrow. Or, you can await trial (3 months from now) and hope to prove your innocence. In the meantime, you will almost certainly lose your job and get evicted from your apartment.

What do you do?

/3
Read 5 tweets
Nov 4, 2021
Jury selection in the #AhmaudArbery trial: 🧵

It was reported today that the judge presiding over the trial of 3 white men accused of murdering Ahmaud Arbery "found that there appears to be intentional discrimination" by the defense attorneys in their exclusion of black jurors.
The result was that the jury that will hear this case is composed of 11 whites and 1 black member.

How did this happen?

During jury selection, both the prosecution and the defense attorneys can use what are known as peremptory challenges, meaning they can strike prospective ...
... jurors for any reason or no reason at all. But they can't strike jurors based on their race. In Batson v. Kentucky (1985), the US SCt ruled that striking jurors on the basis of race is unconstitutional. If one party challenges the other party's strikes as racially...
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(