1) A letter from Samuel Adams in 1778 shows that America’s Founding Fathers required foreigners to receive permission from their intended state of residence before the US would issue a visa.
2) In a letter to James Bowdoin dated September 3, 1778, Samuel Adams wrote from the capital, Philadelphia, about a Mr. Temple. Temple had just arrived in New York from Great Britain. He sought to reside in Boston with his family and to travel to Philadelphia.
3) Adams wrote, “Congress …ordered the Secretary to inform Mr Temple, that if it was his intention to reside in any one of the United States, the same should be signified by him to the State in which he intends to reside …”
4) “… & the approbation of that State obtaind [sic] before a passport [visa] could be granted to him.” This is remarkable, as it shows that the Founders intended that states were sovereign to decide who may and may not reside within their borders.
5) Early American towns could block undesirables - even those with subversive agendas - from entering. Samuel Adams called for “such Steps as may be necessary to prevent the Inhabitants of other Towns from bringing & spreading Infectious Distempers among us.”
Many early American towns, especially in New England where most towns were built as private ventures, voted on whether to admit certain outsiders as residents. The reason was to keep the character of the towns.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with J Michael Waller

J Michael Waller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JMichaelWaller

Jan 22
This is a vital letter about the Great Reset. Please give it a 2-minute read to understand what we face.
2) Cardinal Vigano is one of the wisest international leaders alive. He has been privy to unusual high-level, confidential information. He was the pope's ambassador to Washington. His October 2020 letter to President Trump is extraordinary. Excerpts follow.
3 Cardinal Vigano: 'the forces of Evil aligned in a battle without quarter against the forces of Good; forces of Evil that appear powerful and organized as they oppose the children of Light, who are disoriented and disorganized, abandoned by their temporal and spiritual leaders.'
Read 28 tweets
Jan 19
Our crack FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force busted these ladies who are charged with trespassing, disorderly conduct, and unlawful parading, among other crimes.

While preparing them for prosecution, the FBI cleared a foreign jihadist to enter the USA & take over a Texas synagogue. Image
Sorry, 240 characters made second sentence awkward. It should say, "While preparing them for prosecution, the FBI cleared a foreign jihadist to enter the USA whereupon he took over a Texas synagogue."
That's the same FBI field office, by the way, that ran gangster Whitey Bulger as a confidential human source while Bulger was capo of a notorious organized crime and murder racket.

Now @FBIBoston is bravely battling harmless ladies as if they were terrorists. Something's wrong.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 12
FBI often drops confidential human sources (CHS) once they become politically controversial. Identification of CHS’s is so closely controlled that it would not be hard for case agents, their supervisors, and the CHS management departments to conceal the records from scrutiny.
When the FBI authorizes a CHS to do something illegal (buy drugs, engage in kidnapping plot, incite someone, etc.), it must be approved at a high level in a field office. This is known as an "Otherwise Illegal Activity," or OAI, which is a strictly managed and recorded process.
The FBI gives OAI approval for a specific CHS to commit specific (authorized) crimes as part of a specific investigation.

There is an established, legal procedure for this as "bait" to entrap or otherwise compromise the target of a criminal or national security investigation.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 11
Transcript of FBI's refusal to deny to Senator Cruz that FBI assets were involved in planning, incitement, or execution of J6 violence at Capitol.

It's not an admission, but the refusal to deny is damning. centerforsecuritypolicy.org/fbi-does-not-d…
There are legitimate national security/law enforcement reasons for the FBI publicly to decline to give specifics like numbers and types of FBI agents and assets, times and locations, etc.

It is NOT legitimate for FBI not answer "yes" or "no" to questions like @SenTedCruz asked.
@SenTedCruz Coming after the Justice Department's 4-1/2 month lag in responding to senators' requests for specific information, then not answering the questions in the letter that was finally sent, the FBI's non-response to Senator Cruz shows big problems remain at Headquarters.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(