Noam Blum Profile picture
Jan 22 9 tweets 2 min read
I've found that none of these Twitter covid hawks who constantly retreat to "but kids" and "but vulnerable people" and "but but but" will never ever tell you what their personal covid endgame is. Not even hypothetically. It's because secretly they're still hoping for covid zero.
And yes, people who are like "keep covid restrictions in place because of my personal medical risks" are selfish people and don't think of the very real medical problems that were and still are created BECAUSE OF covid restrictions. Something I know about intimately.
"I might catch covid and I'm at risk" does not get to supersede "this person's medical condition has deteriorated because they had to stay home for two years and now they also can't find the specialized medical care they need because of restrictions and shortages." Screw that.
But no no, everyone who isn't you just wants to go have reckless fun because they want you dead. Sure.
And yeah if "at risk" Twitter expect us all to keep altering our lives for their sakes, they at the very least owe us some measure of coherent answer about the scope and time scale of that sacrifice. The idea that questioning the open-endedness of it all is selfish is insane.
"We're all in this together!"

"For how much longer?"

"Shut the fuck up, murderer."
Can we also discuss the idea of "overwhelmed hospitals"? I understand spring/summer 2020 was brutal, but overwhelmed hospitals used to be a dog-bites-man story that got little attention before covid and isn't ever going away.
Just to close off this thread: I am fucking done being told I'm selfish or lack empathy because I was only willing to do all this stuff for TWO YEARS and not for an even larger and also indefinite number of years. THAT'S being selfish. That's how addicts guilt their enablers.
Watch any episode of Intervention. It's always "you NEVER do anything for me" and "it's NEVER about me" after years and years and it being only about them. It's a defense mechanism to keep them on the hook. And just like there, this isn't cruelty. This is tough love.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noam Blum

Noam Blum Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @neontaster

Jan 21
"Podcasts are a source of disinformation!"

Signed: Podcast host
Oh fuck off.
ASSOCIATE!
Read 5 tweets
Jan 20
I am a firm believer in the philosophy of tone matching, and I generally feel fine being nasty to someone if they were being nasty. This was a particularly egregious example and so I don't think that by making a couple of munchkin jokes I stepped over some line.
Is this a universal? No. Am I entirely consistent with this? No. But nastiness is an emotional reaction, not a cerebral one. None of us are perfect. Reich was galactically gross but instead of just cursing him out I went for the jokes. Trust me, it was the nicer option.
I think someone's physicality is fair game when the issue is some sort of physical scenario (in this case, a bunch of men backhanding a woman). If someone threatens to punch you, him being a waif becomes relevant.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 20
Is there a name for the reverse version of Motte and Bailey? Like when you argue a defensible position but then are expected by the other party to defend its more extreme and indefensible version by extension?
I get that it's basically a strawman, but that's too vague for this very specific phenomenon.
No the scenario I'm describing is that I said I think masks in schools being optional is considerate, someone was like "well so should all childhood vaccines be optional too? Since you're so committed to being considerate..."
Read 5 tweets
Jan 20
I don't know that any other facet of covid has been more politicized and less fact-based than natural immunity, and the vast majority of it is reactive because god forbid you give the vax skeptical any ammo, even if they happen to be right about something.
Yeah 800,000 people died, but at least 100 million Americans had gotten covid in 2020 alone. So your 800,000 sounds large, but it's way less than 1% of the total number of Americans who got covid.

Read 9 tweets
Jan 18
You're being dishonest, James. Health officials specifically talking about BLM protests was a big story and involved hundreds of professionals in the field.
Here's epidemiologists from Harvard and Yale in The Atlantic:
New York Times:
Read 18 tweets
Jan 16
Yoko in the snow is an entire aesthetic.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(