@JoeBiden Nobody sane thinks that @JoeBiden tweeted the below or even knows that it was tweeted in his name.
Be that as it may, COVID—19 isn’t disrupting our daily lives; COVID-19 policies are; including many policies that ignore the science and ones that do more damage than good.
@JoeBiden COVID-19 deaths since @JoeBiden’s first full day in office is 450,013. That’s a daily average of 1,229.
The 438,594 COVID deaths under Trump averaged 1,405 a day but that was pre-vaccines.
Mind-boggling that failed policies continue to be pushed and that Fauci isn’t yet fired.
@JoeBiden 3/ Officials, corporate PR (“media”), and social media companies refuse to search for accurate data and/or they shut down data for many, many months before half-heartedly acknowledging the dat which would necessitate an adjustment in policies, but those changed don’t come.
@JoeBiden 4/ Most outrageous of an example is that days ago was only the second time in 4 months that the CDC published a study on natural immunity; the other being in Oct 2021. Worse, those 2 studies have basic flaws and/or dishonesties that I addressed at the time and won’t do again now.
5/ The relevance of natural immunity for however long/strong it is should have been central to COVID-19 policies, but the CDC doesn’t have running numbers on it publicly; doesn’t have endless studies on it, and suggests no adjustment of policies to the easing side based on it.
6/ Corporate PR (“media”) mostly goes along with the flawed studies rather than calling out basic, glaring issues. When the findings favor natural immunity (NI) - despite the studies having anti NI flaws - it gets spun not what it shows. Whatever. Talking to the four walls.
7/ eighteen months into the outbreak, @drsanjaygupta finally asked Fauci about NI. Fauci said it is a good idea to look at it. Where was the question until then? Why was it not asked weekly of Fauci? Why didn’t Fauci push CDC/Trump-Biden Admins to steadily release those numbers?
@drsanjaygupta 8/ Pre-COVID, it was normal to encourage healthy living as a tool to help mitigate potential impact from a virus. (See Fauci on this in 2019). However, in the last 22 months there is almost no such talk and it got people banned for saying that it helps!
@drsanjaygupta 9/ I read studies in 2020 (!) that many masks work less than people think they do either due to design or how the masks are used. Yet, talk of this as a fact rather than an issue to address got you banned, and govs kept pushing masks as if they do more than they do.
@drsanjaygupta 10/ Plane passengers can be maskless due to eating, so why are masks mandates on planes? Why don’t “aviation reporters” laugh @FAANews, Fauci and @CDCDirector out of town about it? Why are planes turned back for mask refusers when they can “safely” be maskless if they simply eat?
@drsanjaygupta@FAANews@CDCDirector 11/ Kids are forced-masked with all its damages despite the shortcomings of masks; despite natural immunity and/or vaxx protection that staffers have, and despite what Fauci said in 2020 that most spread are from symptomatic people which wouldn’t be asymptomatic kids!
@drsanjaygupta@FAANews@CDCDirector 12/ Speaking of kids, two years of data show that kids under 18 are less than 0.10% of US COVID deaths, and that COVID deaths are 1.05% of all children deaths.
Why aren’t these facts better known, and why doesn’t COVID—9 policy reflect this data which were consistent all along?
Problem is that the vaxx passes led people to think that their symptoms are a strep/cold/flu and continued roaming around causing more spread and deaths!
2 million non-Jewish Arabs live in Israel, and Jews were "Palestinian" the same as non-Jews.
On the flip side, Palestinianism today is predicated on the notion that the area should be free of Jews; the same as in Nazi Germany.
Israel = Inclusivity.
Palestinianism = Nazism.
2/ It's not that Antisemites attach themselves to the "Palestinian" cause. The movement IS antisemitic because if Jews are Palestinian, then "Palestine will be free" from what? The Israel government? Um, if we call it Palestine, Jews will still be in the government. Then what?
3/ "Palestine" is a geographic area that had Jews, Muslims, Christians, so to use "Palestinians" as non-Jews only is Nazism.
This is worse than a white guy who wants NYC to be 91% white as it was in 1948. It's worse because Palestine in 1948 was +50% Jewish, then Arabs invaded.
1/ Why didn’t Obama & Dems make Juneteenth a federal holiday a decade ago?
Simple. The day came into focus only when Trump had planned to return campaigning on 6/19/20. Faix storm ensued.
To own Trump, a federal holiday was born.
I am not complaining; I am giving you history.
2/ Check the Twitter feed of many congressional and Senate Dems, TV heads, and leftists pundits. Most of them literally never sent a tweet about Juneteenth before it became an issue to own Trump in 2020; some only had a mention here and there in previous years.
3/ For example, in all her years on Twitter until 2020, @SpeakerPelosi’s account had tweeted only 4 times abut Juneteenth.
In 2020 alone she tweeted it 4 times; passed a House resolution about the day and got it signed a federal holiday in June '21 by Biden.
- There are no 250+ deaths from the rescue; sure not mostly civilians.
- There is no famine; 99.9% people are full-faced.
- It is not a "camp" of "refugees." It is a fully-developed neighborhood by people who never lived elsewhere.
It's a movement predicated on brazen lies!
Gaza claimed that 23,300 of its citizens died in the first 3 months of the war.
That's 260 deaths a day; 90 days in a row.
If true, the strike in Rafah 2 weeks ago; the strike on a "UN warehouse" last week; and deaths from the rescue would hardly be news.
It's a BS Machine.
No one sane refers to Hasidim in Williamsburg as refugees despite their grand parents having escaped from Europe and from Muslim-majority countries 70-80 years ago. Yet grandkids from Jordanians who worked 2 years for Jews in Haifa in the 1940's, are called refugees...
Can a POTUS retroactively revoke his political opponent's presidential privileges which paves the way for a raid on and prosecution of his opponent who is now seeking immunity from this POTUS?
The answer is yes. Biden did just that.
A Biden Judge asked the attorney of Biden's Political Opponet if a POTUS has the authority to take out his political opponent, and if the answer is no then it implies that Biden('s DOJ) can continue to try to take out his political opponent...
1984 wasn't this convoluted.
The Biden DOJ asked Trump for docs.
Trump claimed executive privilege (EP).
DOJ went to the WH for help.
Biden Deputized the National Archivist to revoke Trump's EP.
She did.
DOJ affidavit mentions violations of Archive laws (created by action above) as a reason to raid! 🚨