Story time, boys and girls. Let’s say you live in a neighborhood where everyone’s lawn is dying and you are convinced it is your neighbor Gary’s fault because he refuses to put a pink flamingo in his yard. 1/
No matter how much anyone tries to persuade him, Gary will not cooperate with the rest of the neighborhood who had all dutifully put pink flamingos in their yards when the HOA asked them to in order to stop the spread of whatever was killing their yards. 2/
Gary drives past all the other pink-flamingoed yards in the neighborhood every day to and from his job. On the weekends he works in his own yard flaunting its lack of a pink flamingo for all the neighbors to see. 3/
As the lawns get worse, the neighbors redouble their efforts and put a second or even third flamingo in their yards. Nothing they do seems to help their yards. “Without 100% pink flamingo participation,” the HOA says, “our lawns are going to continue to suffer.” 4/
You know who is to blame. Gary’s selfishness is causing the lawns to die. Why can’t he just cooperate? It’s just a pink flamingo. What is the big deal? To make matters worse, Gary is a fellow church member of yours. Doesn’t he care about his witness for Christ?! 5/
You decide you’ve had enough. You confront Gary. You tell him that by not putting a pink-flamingo in his yard he is not loving his neighbor. You quote several verses at him hoping they’ll prick his conscience and make him repent. Gary grows frustrated with you. 6/
“This is silly and stupid,” Gary says with huff, “plastic pink flamingos won’t save our yards. This is pointless. I won’t comply.” 7/
Angry and powerless to change Gary’s mind, you begin writing articles for the community newsletter about how neighbors with pink flamingos in their yards are good people and that those without them are not. 8/
You successfully lobby the HOA to prevent pink flamingoless neighbors from using the pool. “That’ll teach Gary,” you think with delight. 9/
Months and months pass and the lawns continued to decline. The flamingos grow dusty as their lawns dry up. The HOA, in despair, concedes defeat. “Our flamingos were useless. They didn’t prevent a thing. This drought was beyond our control. There was nothing to be done.” 10/
All that anger at Gary. All that smear and abuse. Could the HOA really be correct? Was it all for naught? Was I horrid to my neighbor this whole time? Was Gary right all along? Do I… no… do I owe him an apology for the way he was treated? 11/
But wait. What’s this? A new statement from the HOA. “Yes, it’s true the pink flamingos were useless. They never did a thing. However, we have a new solution that is sure to do the trick.” 12/
“Garden gnomes?” you read out loud. “Of course! Garden gnomes! I must get one at once.” As you rush out the door to acquire yourself a gnome, you run into Gary who has just arrived home. Gary, that jerk who was right all along. Our lawns are doomed as long as he lives here. 13/
Then you start planning how to get Gary out of your neighborhood because he’s a bad person after all.
Oh by the way this story is about Covid and masks. The end. 14/14
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It should be noted that @ThabitiAnyabwil considers @RevKevDeYoung's review of @dukekwondc and @_wgthompson's Reparations book an example of white supremacy at work. Furthermore, their response to Kevin was published on Thabiti's site.
Read this today. Beware any evangelical leader that a) denies that there’s any such thing as an inner circle of evangelical leaders (evangelical elite) or b) denies having any temptation to temper what they say in order to stay in or gain entrance. 1/ lewissociety.org/innerring/
As Lewis says, there’s nothing inherently wrong with an inner circle. It’s the desire to be within it that can become disordered and lead to compromise. That’s a major theme of Hamilton most vividly expressed through Aaron Burr’s desire to be in the 🎶Room Where It Happens🎶. 2/
Those of us who have been critical of evangelical elites err when we assume anyone in these inner circles (and there are many levels) is there because they compromised. Many faithful Christians do excellent work and(or?) through the providence of God find themselves inside. 3/
This discussion of evangelical elites by noted evangelical elites @RevKevDeYoung, @between2worlds, and @collinhansen is quite good. KDY even uses the positive, neutral, negative framework that @aaron_renn has written about. Starts about 29:00. One thing occurred to me… 1/7
The guys start by describing what they think people mean when they use the “evangelical elites” term and then go on to have a good discussion about the very real temptations and pitfalls of evangelical elites. 2/7
What occurred to me is that they acknowledge EE temptations that aren’t substantially different than the concerns I hear in discussions with non-elite evangelicals. It makes me wonder how much of this divide with solidly conservative EE is just a communication problem. 3/7
This essay by @aaron_renn is key to understanding the growing divide within conservative evangelicalism. Many of the so-called evangelical elite are still operating from within the Neutral World paradigm that was valid when they built their platforms. 1/5 americanreformer.org/welcome-to-the…
They can't comprehend that anti-Christian sentiment has reached critical mass and that no amount of contrite cultural engagement will win over a culture that despises us not for what we've done wrong but for what we believe. 2/5
Paradigm shifts are hard for anyone, but particularly for those with a vested interest in the old paradigm. This is why many evangelical leaders have been slow to acknowledge our most pressing problems. Those problems don't make sense in the old Neutral World paradigm. 3/5
"In other words, the story of oppression cannot be told with reference to one race, one sex, one class, one nation, or one civilization. The problem of injustice goes deeper, past the identity obsessions of our age, all the way to our identity as fallen human beings."
"The fundamental problem with CRT is not its assumption that worldly systems often favor the powerful. The fundamental problem is limiting “power” to the one axis of race, class, and sex, when power does not always work according to an intersectional spreadsheet." 1/2
At the pool this morning, some neighbors were speaking favorably about increasing covid restrictions. I kept silent because I disagreed. I guess I worried it would hurt my witness to disagree over non-essential things. 1/
Later, at the ball field, I was talking with one of my son’s coaches and he launched into a rant about covid restrictions. I shared his frustrations and we had a good conversation. 2/
It later hit me that in each situation the other person just shared his or her opinion without a care about what I thought. I didn’t. This led me to a bit of an epiphany about relational evangelism. 3/