Here are the cumulative cases and deaths linked to these outbreaks, since I started pulling the reports on Dec. 10th.
These are patients or healthcare workers that caught COVID while in the hospital. Some patients then died.
2/9
Here are the total new cases from this past week, by Hospital.
The worst offenders this week are Villa Caritas, RAH and RGH.
3/9
The Villa Caritas outbreak is especially horrifying. This is a very vulnerable population, and they've allowed virtually every patient to become infected.
Per this article, 80% of patients were infected. 3 days later, 21 more people have caught it.
A small poll of 50 HCWs in Alberta found only 25% of hospitals are using Continuous N95s during Omicron. 42% are using Targeted N95s for COVID+, and a staggering 33% are still following pure #DropletDogma with surgical masks for everything but AGMPs.
5/9
Why are targeted N95s for COVID+/sus patients not enough?
Because COVID is EVERYWHERE, and Airborne transmission often occurs during the presymptomatic or early symptomatic phase, where patient screening fails.
With the scientific consensus shifting on Airborne, these folks are now sowing doubt in the efficacy of N95s... a tried and true PPE used in many other industries to prevent inhalation of hazardous aerosols.
.@tom_cardoso, @globeandmail why are you interviewing ID MDs about Respiratory PPE? Lynora Saxinger has muddied the science of Airborne Transmission and obstructed access to Respiratory PPE for 2 years. She and the other obstructionists are liable. They are not honest brokers. 1/
What training do these MDs have in Respiratory PPE and the physics of masks?
This would be like doing an investigative report on the Boeing 737MAX crashes, and only interviewing the Boeing and FDA executives that rubber stamped the negligent certification documents. 2/
Right off the bat... does this quote not strike you as odd? Have you seen a respirator? They are not individually fit/molded to a person's face. They are DESIGNED to fit, UNLIKE A SURGICAL MASK.
You know what mask forces air out the sides 100% of the time? A SURGICAL MASK. 3/
It has a weakness: it needs to travel on an air bridge.
We have the technology to break that air bridge, through filtering, cleaning and changing the air.
🧵 on some Omicron avoidance SUCCESS stories!
1/
1️⃣ Last Monday, my family was briefly exposed to a symptomatic person who had tested negative on a RAT. When I realized they were symptomatic, I asked them to leave as a precaution, and immediately refreshed the air via doors and windows open. They tested + the next day.
2/
For the next week, we wore respirators in the house to protect our 2 year old son, just in case we had become infected.
9 days later, nobody has tested positive.
Lesson: Isolate symptomatic people, regardless of RAT result. If exposed, purge the air as soon as possible.
3/
Many people are waking up with the gift of Omicron this Christmas, thanks to our incompetent government and PH establishment, that decided to let this Airborne virus rip.
Stop the cycle - if you have ANY symptoms, DO NOT GATHER regardless of Rapid Test OR PCR Test result.
Early symptoms that I've heard from friends and family:
If you have ANY of these, DO NOT VISIT FAMILY INDOORS.
DON'T TRUST A NEGATIVE TEST (PCR or RAT)
I've heard more anecdotes than I can count of RATs and PCRs missing early symptomatic cases. Some people are testing positive on the throat but not nose - so do BOTH!
One friend transmitted it during a 10 minute maskless encounter, while still presymptomatic and unaware.
Getting warmer... but still insufficient for an Airborne virus.
There are some easter eggs in this document, which tell us the @WHO IPAC Group is STILL drunk on #DropletDogma, and that they DO NOT support this minor change in RPE guidance.
First, Omicron is measles-level Airborne (maybe worse). 2 weeks ago I had no close friends or family that had caught COVID. As of today, 3 people close to me are positive after long-range Airborne transmission in restaurants or at work.
How do I know it's long range? They did not get within 20ft of an index case. They inhaled it from the air.
One friend wore a CAN99 everywhere, EXCEPT in his closed door office space, in a large work trailer. The index case was in the same trailer, on the opposite side.
3/
This victimhood narrative from IPAC really defies belief.
It's incredibly petty and disingenuous to use tone policing and "rude twitter streamers" as an excuse for inaction and a shield against accountability.
It is doubly inappropriate, when 1000's of lives are at stake.
These folks are hospital directors, who set the infection control guidance for their hospitals and the province. They rule with an iron fist.
When subordinates and other disciplines spoke up about aerosol, they were chided, mocked, threatened, and retaliated against.
2/9
These IPAC Directors are the ones deciding that your elderly relative has to remove their N95 and replace it with a baggy blue when they go for surgery.
They are the ones propping up the school boards' bans on teacher respirator use.
MacIntyre 2013 found that continuous N95 use resulted in a statistically significant reduction in Clinical Respiratory Illness (CRI), whereas targeted/intermittent N95 use was not superior to medical masks.
This is not surprising given the nature of aerosol transmission.