British journalists with no accomplishments or purpose are always the most contemptuous of Julian Assange. That's just basic petty jealousy. But the indifference toward, even support for, this grave attack on press freedom by the US & UK *from journalists* never ceases to amaze.
Technically, this is a "victory" for Assange. But the High Court agreed to decide whether to hear his case only on the narrowest, most technical ground. In the meantime, he remains silenced in a cage: what the US/UK want even more than his extradition.
This is the key point. There is a clear purpose behind the attempt to destroy Assange:
To signal to western journalists they can do what they want as long as they don't meaningfully undermine power centers by disclosing information they want concealed.
Watching US citizens and subjects of the British crown (including journalists) justify Assange's persecution by claiming he's not a journalist but a spy or national security threat is grotesque.
This is the exact rationale used by every tyrant to justify imprisoning journalists.
🤮
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Good morning from the American liberals fighting against fascism, to protect US democracy, and ensure that we all live under basic democratic norms of freedom and liberty.
I'd like once again to pose the question: is emphatic and direct opposition to US involvement in Ukraine coming primarily from left-wing politicians or right-wing politicians?
The central rhetorical tactic of neocons for decades is to accuse anyone who questions their new plan for US military action of being a traitor, on the side of The Enemy.
That's now the framework on CNN and in liberal circles for Ukraine because neocons lead liberal discourse.
"Biden is considering deploying several thousand U.S. troops, as well as warships and aircraft, to NATO allies in the Baltics and Eastern Europe, an expansion of American military involvement amid mounting fears of a Russian incursion into Ukraine."
The goal of Russiagate - beyond sabotaging a just-elected president who the CIA, neocons and the military-industrial complex viewed as an unstable threat - was to propagandize liberals into seeing Moscow as a military threat. We're now seeing the fruits.
In 2015, there was enormous bipartisan pressure on Obama to swamp Ukraine with lethal arms. When he resisted, that turned to rage. That rage was channeled by @JeffreyGoldberg, and **Obama told him: Ukraine is a vital interest to Russia, not the U.S.**
Os lulistas mais fanáticos podem atacar David como quiserem. Depois de tudo o que ele teve que superar em sua vida, e as batalhas contra os governos dos EUA e do Reino Unido e o Ministério Justiça de Moro e a Lava Jato que fizemos juntos, ele pode lidar. Ele faz o que acha certo.
David quase foi preso em 2013 para expor a espionagem ilegal da NSA/CIA contra o Brasil. Fundamos @TheInterceptBr em 2016 para se opor ao impeachment de Dilma. Nossas vidas foram derrubadas para expor a corrupção de Moro/LJ, que libertou Lula. Falar é fácil; ações, mais difíceis.
Nada surpreende: Ciro foi um dos principais opositores do impeachment de Dilma. Defendeu nosso trabalho #VazaJato e denunciou Moro/LJ. No entanto, tb o chamam de golpista. Para os campos dogmáticos mais extremos, nenhuma divergência é permitida: subserviência total, ou inimigo.
Meanwhile, war-hungry neocons have re-migrated back to the Democratic Party to do what they exist to do: agitate for every war, demonize every US adversary, malign anyone who resists as a traitor. They know liberal culture is their best host for this:
The Committee plotted with JPMorgan Chase and its lawyer, former Obama AG Loretta Lynch, to obtain a citizen's financial records with no possibility of judicial review.
Then the Committee told a court it is not bound by any limits that the FBI and other agencies must observe.
Congress's 1/6 Committee has been secretly obtaining private information about US citizens en masse: telephone records, email logs, browsing history, banking transactions. And it has done so without safeguards: no judicial oversight, warrants, legal limitations of any kind.
It's nothing short of stunning how the US Govt continues to convince its journalists that its motive in places like Ukraine is to defend democracy when -- leaving aside from the coup the US engineered in Ukraine -- the US props up the tyrants of Saudi Arabia, UAE and Egypt.
The second you step outside the US and speak with people who haven't been drowned in this propaganda their whole lives, they immediately see it. Here's a mainstream Brazilian reporter with Globo, @gugachacra, pointing this out. How do they manage to obscure this in the US???
"Yes, we go around the world toppling governments at will and propping up the most savage tyrannies -- and we have for decades -- yet you will tell Americans that our motive is always to side with pro-democracy forces and protect and defend freedom."