" I am inclined, however, to think that in proportion to their numbers, and considering India as a whole, the Muslims have never ceased to play an important role in the public life
of the country, whether before or under British rule
(1/n).
-—and that the distinction between Hindu and Muslim of which we hear so much nowadays is largely an artificial creation,
a kind of Catholic—Protestant controversy in Ireland, in which our present-day rulers have had a hand.
(2/n).
History will bear me out when I say that it is a misnomer to talk of Muslim rule when describing the political order in India prior to the advent of the British.
(3/n).
Whether we talk of the Moghul Emperors at Delhi, or of the Muslim Kings of Bengal,we shall find that in either ease the administration was run by Hindus and Muslims together, many of the prominent
Cabinet Ministers & Generals being Hindus. "~Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.
(4/n).
Taken from An Indian Pilgrim by Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, Chapter number 3, Before My Time, page number 21~22.
" The conflict is not essentially between the Arabs and the Jews. We must remember that the present problem of Palestine is of recent creation.
(1/n).
It has come into existence since the Great War and the responsibility for it must rest with the British Government, which made lavish promises to both the Arabs and the Jews during the war and sought to exploit both to their own advantage.
(2/n).
These promises were often mutually contradictory. Since the war it has not been love of the Jews that has moved the British Government but the desire to control an important route to India and the East.
" Three days ago, when I should have normally written to you this letter, a heavy blow fell upon all of us and upon India .
(1/n).
We shall take a long time to recover from it and, even so, there will always be a sense of emptiness for those who had the privilege of knowing and working with Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.
(2/n).
The great ones pass, the warriors who led us in our struggle depart, and we all feel somewhat lonely and desolate. On those who remain, the burden and the responsibility grow heavier.
Debunking Myths and Lies about Jawaharlal Nehru regarding Jammu and Kashmir:
(1/n).
1. On Ceasefire:
Why India had a Ceasefire?
Nehru Government was advised by the Army for a ceasefire with Pakistan in 1948. It can be proved from the correspondence between Jawaharlal Nehru and then Commander- in - Chief , General Sir Francis Robert Roy Bucher.
(2/n).
In his message to Nehru dated 28 November 1948, Bucher warned of fatigue among Indian troops in Kashmir, adding that an “overall military decision was no longer possible”.
This meant that despite political independence, she was completely dependent on the advanced countries for achieving any economic growth though investment.
(2/n).
This was a neo-colonial type situation, which needed immediate remedy. And this is what the famous Nehru- Mahalonobis strategy tried to reverse by adopting a path of industrialization based on heavy industry or capital goods industry.
" The conflict is not essentially between the Arabs and the Jews. We must remember that the present problem of Palestine is of recent creation.
(1/n).
It has come into existence since the Great War and the responsibility for it must rest with the British Government, which made lavish promises to both the Arabs and the Jews during the war and sought to exploit both to their own advantage.
(2/n).
These promises were often mutually contradictory. Since the war it has not been love of the Jews that has moved the British Government but the desire to control an important route to India and the East.
See how cleverly Mr Distortion has hidden the word ‘Informally’.
For those who want to know the truth, the following quote is from Jawaharlal Nehru's note about his visit to the USSR on August 1, 1955.
On September 27, 1955, Nehru was asked a short notice question in this regard in Parliament by JN Parekh.
(2/n).
Parekh asked
"Will the Prime Minister be pleased to state;
(a) whether it is a fact that India has refused a seat informally offered to her in the Security Council of the United Nations; (b) if so, the reasons therefor;