dikgaj Profile picture
Jan 24 5 tweets 2 min read
@unequal_power I had a long running exchange on Twitter where I pointed out that exactly same criteria he uses to “infer” Boses alleged islamophilia wd apply to SPM and Savarkar. I asked him why he never brought up that side of his idol. He had deleted his tweets as I found out yesterday.
@unequal_power Sarvesh carefully ignores the writings or communications of Bose that problematises his thesis, he never ever highlights the acts/statements of SPM/Savarkar in HMS that shows their continuing “blindness” by his own standards. I find it rather insidious and not insightful.
@unequal_power At the end of the day, his statement was he “infers” abt Boses “motivation” - which of course he doesn’t repeat for his idol. He has to infer because he can’t show Bose showed the fundamental criteria to identify a mullah “ally”:
@unequal_power one who knowingly empowers and forwards Islam’s political, social, military and religious agenda towards ultimate Islamic victory over the non Muslim. One who defers and bows to Muslim clerics and honours them or their religious sites/icons wd be an obvious feature for example.
@unequal_power Sarvesh applied his criteria selectively, based on whether the subject is his favourite or hated, and passes of his speculations as truth as if he really could prove he got inside Bose’s head. I understand the sources of appreciation of Sarvesh, but no, I find his claims dubious.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with dikgaj

dikgaj Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dikgaj

Jan 23
All those unhappy with Bose, pretending to be Indian, Hindu, self appointed "experts on India", or else, shd realize all that Indians felt cheated of by Gandhians - they added as hopes on Bose. He has grown with time out of a nation's hopes. Its an enemy impossible to bring down.
Those who think they are the only "true Hindus" (and the rest are illegitimate flotsam who dont share the true's bloodlines) and Bose a "lesser Hindu", can try to think why Bose remains so popular without state agitprop to generations of flotsam who never saw him or heard him, .
Those who filled newsprint with Bose being dubbed Tojo's pet, or the left+right "western" experts concerned about India's mental health on Bose turning India the next Nazi base, shd think why in spite of all that agitprop, Indians neither believe it nor do they stop adoring Bose.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 23
Indians at the receiving end of thug British rule never had any ambivalence on Subhas not being a British at heart, didn't see the world through British eyes or interests. Only diehard imperialists who fret on having lost their jewel in the crown will see danger in Bose's statue.
McDonald's panic is understandable: for pseudo-progressives closet-imperialists, "decolonisation" of cultures like India must not uproot the networks of influence, left behind in colonies that allows the ex-colonial to try and manipulate the ex-colonized to its own advantage.
McDonald's two very Brit concerns are amusingly revealing and wd have done a Churchill honour, Nehru was the good "British" guy, whose one fault was appearing for INA undertrials: well he had no option, if he and INC wanted to retain any political legitimacy in people's eyes.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 6
On a lighter view on the retirement, in light of CA debates, '49 on how "old men" wr the most sagacious/mature/foresighted: Had Nehru retired at 60, he wd hv done the CA, but not confirmed Tibet to CPC or gone to Bandung lobbying for Maoist China, and not be there in '62.
Had MK Gandhi retired at 60, he wd have started the career of Jawarlal, but that would be it. I think it would be an interesting exercise for alt hist buffs to fill out the scenarios.
The point is that there can be serious skewering of course for a nation and ppl if individuals persist in power who get fixated on apparatus of personal power, and in turn get fixed in applying tools s/he initially succeeded with - but that no longer is the best for the ppl.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 6
1) Many problems actually. Start with "no difficulty". For advocates, of necessity one side will fail even if seemingly having "no difficulty". If s/he fails too many times, s/he wont hv clients, and wont need to argue. No such market or otherwise fail-criteria to judge judges.
2) In fact judiciary is so far above critical assessment, that there is a de facto absence of answerability or assessment that is independent of themselves. The only body in a democratic state with power over others without any independent oversight or accountability to the ppl.
3) that "no difficulty" claim becomes even more of a self-certification for judges than for the advocate - whom, it is expected, that at the least market forces will assess whether she/he is really in "no difficulty" or otherwise.
Read 15 tweets
Jan 6
1) Every year I fret and fume in private abt my undergrad maths students previous years "algebra" prep which basically thwarts what I need to get them to do. But I think its precisely the "engagement/application/utility" route Gates is advocating that has worsened the situation.
2) Forcing the mind to think abstractly right from the beginning, through the algebraic structures - opens up the simple relationships between the structures and their properties - which "examples" route diverts frm and blocks developing the ability to think abstractly.
3) what I see is a dumb "AI" style pattern matching from "examples/applications" and not the simpler and more direct abstract thinking. If the "examples" dont match the issue at hand, "nearest neighbour" need not help - as the thinking needed to use it is not there.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 3
Criminals r tried where they commit crime regardless of claimed "original" citizenship. Any such ISIS cuties shd face Iraqi justice, not the politically correct Indian one which might apply 'selective protection at all costs' principle to say bacchi bigar gayi, prem se chhor do.
In case the infamous German or Belgian examples are cited: I am aware of European legal foxtrot to force govs to repatriate Europe's own ISIS cutie pies to protect them. Side effect, hubby of German ISIS cutie got away with jail term in Germany, not torn limb from limb in Iraq.
That cute ISIS hubby of cutie ISIS pie German woman, bought a slave and her child from khalifa approved slave market, and chained the child in the sun until she died from dehydration in front of her mother.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(