THREAD II: And now on to the second brief filed by @carterwpage attorney, with @McAdooGordon serving as local counsel. This brief responds to GOVERNMENT's motion to dismiss. The other brief was the 8 individual actors: This is DOJ/FBI as entities. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
2/ Interesting. Didn't realize this was part of relief sought:
3/ Yup, that's just what our government did:
4/ Synoposis of full argument:
5/ With zinger to close introduction:
6/ A great point: This wasn't about Page--this was about Trump!
7/ Still trying to zero in on who the actual leaker was. Doesn't matter if they were all in on it but the emails b/w Strzok and Page (see THREAD I) are suggestive.
8/ Back shortly: Math & lunch time for DS.
9/ Reading on to see if they are identified...
10/ These are Page's claims against government as an entity. The FTCA is basically a federal statute that allows you to sue it under basic "tort" principles that apply to business/individuals.
11/ Patriot Act claims are based on gov't unlawful use of information gathered. Here, Page claims gov't unlawfully used info in "media leaks" strategy and also in later FISA applications.
12/ Also, on point that warrant was issued to they are all protected, this argument is solid:
13/ This paragraph is a perfect capsulization of why SOL has not expired.
HOLY CRAP: Just finished scrutinizing Durham's latest filing in Sussmann case and check out this weirdness. Sussmann goes to OIG saying Tech Exe-1 (Joffe) saw an OIG employee's computer connecting to VPN in foreign country. That alone raises 100 questions, but read below. 1/
2/2 OIG "represented" to Special Counsel's office "no other file or documentation." But then Sussmann's attorneys tell Durham's team, oh, I actually MET w/ OIG...so Durham's team goees back to OIG & amazingly there is more documentation. WTF! Working on this and other tidbits!
Post-Twit: Think about this: The Special Counsel's office laid the OIG out in public! This warrants putting my fudge away for the night...again, I curse... WTF
A killer opener in the brief filed by @carterwpage attorney. 1/
2/ Here's the link for anyone wanting to read in its entirety. I'll be adding some points here and if it merits, write up an article later. So stay tuned...storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
THREADETTE: I'm literally chuckling to myself thinking how prominent "journalists" spent 4 years writing, tweeting, discussing, how Trump's Russia policy was pro-Russia b/c Putin had kompromat on Trump. There was no kompromat on Trump but Russia 💯 has lots on Biden. 1/
2/ And while Trump sanctioned Russia blocking pipeline to Germany, Biden undid that sanction allowing Russia to bypass Ukraine, putting Ukraine more at risk.
3/ Yet, I can't even imagine the non-corrupt segment of media seriously pushing narrative that Biden is pro-Putin and sacrificed Ukraine b/c Putin has leverage over Biden with videos, emails, texts, etc.
3/ Beyond the ridiculous "wrong verb" spin, you know like it depends what the meaning of "is, is," Roberts didn't say he didn't ask, he said he didn't "request."
3/ So, of course, me being me, tried to find out me. But most of the coverage was surface, so I did a deep dive. @FDRLST ttps://thefederalist.com/2022/01/17/arizonas-fight-with-biden-over-mask-ban-another-chance-for-the-supreme-court-to-defend-separation-of-powers/