THREAD II: And now on to the second brief filed by @carterwpage attorney, with @McAdooGordon serving as local counsel. This brief responds to GOVERNMENT's motion to dismiss. The other brief was the 8 individual actors: This is DOJ/FBI as entities. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
2/ Interesting. Didn't realize this was part of relief sought:
3/ Yup, that's just what our government did:
4/ Synoposis of full argument:
5/ With zinger to close introduction:
6/ A great point: This wasn't about Page--this was about Trump!
7/ Still trying to zero in on who the actual leaker was. Doesn't matter if they were all in on it but the emails b/w Strzok and Page (see THREAD I) are suggestive.
8/ Back shortly: Math & lunch time for DS.
9/ Reading on to see if they are identified...
10/ These are Page's claims against government as an entity. The FTCA is basically a federal statute that allows you to sue it under basic "tort" principles that apply to business/individuals.
11/ Patriot Act claims are based on gov't unlawful use of information gathered. Here, Page claims gov't unlawfully used info in "media leaks" strategy and also in later FISA applications.
12/ Also, on point that warrant was issued to they are all protected, this argument is solid:
13/ This paragraph is a perfect capsulization of why SOL has not expired.
14/ 😅🤣😆😂🤣😅😂But see @AdamSchiff
15/ noted in footnoted.
16/16 Conclusion. Now off to write-up some more detailed thoughts/analysis.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Jan 26
HOLY CRAP: Just finished scrutinizing Durham's latest filing in Sussmann case and check out this weirdness. Sussmann goes to OIG saying Tech Exe-1 (Joffe) saw an OIG employee's computer connecting to VPN in foreign country. That alone raises 100 questions, but read below. 1/ Image
2/2 OIG "represented" to Special Counsel's office "no other file or documentation." But then Sussmann's attorneys tell Durham's team, oh, I actually MET w/ OIG...so Durham's team goees back to OIG & amazingly there is more documentation. WTF! Working on this and other tidbits! Image
Post-Twit: Think about this: The Special Counsel's office laid the OIG out in public! This warrants putting my fudge away for the night...again, I curse... WTF
Read 4 tweets
Jan 25
My Top 5 GIFs explained.
#1: This point/article is profound and I have a right to be proud of myself.
1/
2/ This point is so illogical and idiotic and let me explain why on a Twitter thread...nope, too much time to lay it out and not worth it.
3/ I received a kind and gracious compliment and I truly do appreciate it.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 24
A killer opener in the brief filed by @carterwpage attorney. 1/
2/ Here's the link for anyone wanting to read in its entirety. I'll be adding some points here and if it merits, write up an article later. So stay tuned...storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ BOOM!
Read 31 tweets
Jan 21
THREADETTE: I'm literally chuckling to myself thinking how prominent "journalists" spent 4 years writing, tweeting, discussing, how Trump's Russia policy was pro-Russia b/c Putin had kompromat on Trump. There was no kompromat on Trump but Russia 💯 has lots on Biden. 1/
2/ And while Trump sanctioned Russia blocking pipeline to Germany, Biden undid that sanction allowing Russia to bypass Ukraine, putting Ukraine more at risk.
3/ Yet, I can't even imagine the non-corrupt segment of media seriously pushing narrative that Biden is pro-Putin and sacrificed Ukraine b/c Putin has leverage over Biden with videos, emails, texts, etc.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
THREADETE: LOL. First read @mrddmia of course, and then @NPR laughable "clarification" explained. Then continue 1/
2/ Compare: ImageImage
3/ Beyond the ridiculous "wrong verb" spin, you know like it depends what the meaning of "is, is," Roberts didn't say he didn't ask, he said he didn't "request."
Read 5 tweets
Jan 17
THREADETTE: On Friday, this headline made me do a double-take.
2/ ...because this is how I saw things:
3/ So, of course, me being me, tried to find out me. But most of the coverage was surface, so I did a deep dive. @FDRLST ttps://thefederalist.com/2022/01/17/arizonas-fight-with-biden-over-mask-ban-another-chance-for-the-supreme-court-to-defend-separation-of-powers/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(