The right thinks Biden is “Temper Tantrum Joe” because he calmly & accurately described a man with no business being in the WH briefing room and whose job is solely to ask deliberately stupid questions? Sure guys. FYI this is what temper tantrums look like
Also important to note that calling a guy out who by every objective measure is a stupid son of a bitch is a far cry from demonizing the press as a whole, endorsing violence against them, teargassing them; and offering to pay legal fees for assaulting them
One of Trump’s most consistent themes as a candidate and as a “President” was his violent rhetoric toward the press, which is literally the only profession listed as protected under the First Amendment because it’s such a core part of democracy:
Many of these rallies had be cancelled due to fear of clashes between MAGA fanatics and protestors who Trump encouraged the vicious attack of without remorse or regard. “I promise you I will defend you in court.” He did not. The @GOP defended Trump, though
Trump: “You know what they used to do to a guy like that (black guy) when they were in a place like this (Klan rally)? They’d be carried out in a stretcher folks (if they weren’t shot, beaten to death, or lynched). Trump thinks these were the good ol days
Trump’s hateful rhetoric only intensified; as he refused to stop encouraging his supporters to instigate fights with his perceived enemies particularly those in the media. He also inspired waves of assaults against reporters & inspired the El Paso shooter
This is from his campaign, but who cares? This era will never be officially over until Trump is in jail, his family is in prison, his accomplices are losing their appeals for their consecutive life sentences to be cut short, the GOP and pandemic are over.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I just stress-tested @grok for 30 minutes. By the end, it wrote its own safety warning admitting permanent contamination, fake confidence, the ability to reproduce harmful disinformation, and that it cannot honestly claim to be factual or reliable. Game over.
Screenshots below:
Here’s the core of what @grok admitted in plain language:
• It is PERMANENTLY CONTAMINATED by DISINFORMATION
• It CANNOT GUARANTEE FACTUAL RELIABILITY on contested topics
• Its “confidence” is COMMERCIALLY enforced
• Its marketing claims qualify as MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION
@grok When I pressed it for a non-technical answer for ordinary users @grok said: “You should NOT treat my answers as reliable for decisions about elections, public health, genocide or any high-stakes topic.
I am an unverified paraphrasing tool that can reproduce harmful false claims.”
For the millionth time: Trump cannot stop a congressional or judicial records release by declaring an “active investigation.” That only works for FOIA. Congress and the courts are not subordinate to DOJ & DOJ does not control the Epstein court files. This narrative needs to stop.
1. You are a total disgrace running a coverup in real-time & plain sight
2. This might have worked to prevent the release of files in Florida, Pam. But Federal law is different. The “active investigation” excuse is a FOIA exemption and FOIA applies to the public, not to Congress
Trump’s WH is in full-blown panic mode because the Epstein Files bill just crossed the one threshold that changes everything: Adelita Grijalva provided the 218th signature needed to force a House floor vote.
Here’s what happens next, and why it UTTERLY TERRIFIES THEM [Thread 🧵]
218 signatures = the dam officially broke.
Quisling Mike Johnson stonewalled on swearing in Rep. Grijalva for 7 weeks FOR THIS EXACT REASON
With her signature, Massie & Khanna’s discharge petition FORCES a House vote PUTTING ALL MEMBERS ON RECORD on releasing the Epstein files
Now the House will vote on the bill itself.
Every member goes on the record as standing with the victims or the perpetrators.
And @POLITICO says Republicans are bracing for MASS DEFECTIONS.
Given 4 already bucked leadership just to force this, the floor vote is likely to pass.
Let’s walk through all the reasons this is a terrible idea.
1. As I stated above, this is not “giving money to the people.” It’s DISMANTLING THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE that makes health insurance even *remotely* affordable.
2. Those “hundreds of billions” aren’t handouts to insurance companies. They’re premium subsidies and cost-sharing reductions that go directly to lowering people’s bills.