DCPetterson Profile picture
Jan 26 8 tweets 2 min read
The man who won World War II was not hailed as a hero until midway through the 2010's. Most people still don't know his name. I bet many of my Tweeple do, because you peeps are smart.

1/8
The depth of his classified record wasn't revealed until the 1990s. I knew about his achievements in the 1970s, because I'm a computer science geek and a history freak. And I'm old.

He committed suicide in the 1950s, at the age of 41.

2/8
He killed himself because he'd been persecuted by the British government for something right-wing American fascists and televangelists again want to make a crime.

Some think we might have beaten Hitler without this man's help.

3/8
At the least, it would have taken two more years and and additional 14 million dead as military and civilian casualties.

But we could also have lost the war entirely.

I take a lesson from this.

Fascism was beaten--not by armies, but by a small group of dedicated nerds.

4/8
Alan Turing and a small team he lead found a way to decode the secret messages the Nazis used to pass information. Every Allied success in Europe after 1941 was due to Alan Turing.

His work also led to the computer. The one you are reading this tweet on right now.

5/8
Most of his work was considered top secret until the 1990s. Only computer science geeks and history freaks knew about it.

Alan Turing was also a gay man. Homosexuality was illegal in England. He was forced to agree to chemical castration in the early 1950s.

6/8
He then killed himself.

.

I take many lessons from this.

Individuals can change the world.

They often work out of the light.

Most people might never know their names.

Most people might never know what they did.

Certainly not while they're doing it.

7/8
And they might be hated.

By the very people they save.

.

There's a lot more to Alan Turing's story. He's been a hero of mine since the 1970s when I first learned about him. Watch the movie "The Imitation Game."

And don't imagine YOU don't matter.

8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DCPetterson

DCPetterson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dcpetterson

Jan 23
Oz wants to debate Fauci, trying to put himself (a huckster and a fraud) on the same level as one of the world's most respected medical professionals.

Oz, of course, won't be limited by boring things like "facts" or "data." He would be free to spew mountains of bullshit.

1/4
In any sort of "debate," hucksters use their time to fast-talk dozens of lies per second into a bilge of toxic effluvium, unconstrained by ethics, truth, reality, or even sanity. No rational opponent can respond to even a fraction of the tsunami of mendacity.

2/4
Of course, Oz doesn't want to debate any of the Democrats who are running for the Senate seat he's auditioning for. This isn't about discussing real issues. It's about creating a boogeyman target, spreading conspiracy theories, and selling more swag.

3/4
Read 5 tweets
Jan 17
Weekly COVID death rate by vaccine status and type of vaccine in the United States. The decline in death rate among unvaccinated people since late summer is likely due to the growing prevalence of Omicron.
ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths-b…
The difference between being vaccinated, and not, is particularly striking for people aged 65-79.

Note that Omicron is still pretty deadly. Don't underestimate the danger. (There's no downside to overestimating the danger.)
The difference in vaccination status for people aged 30-49 is pretty striking too. Not being a senior citizen doesn't make you safe.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 16
I keep running into Twitt accounts trying to blackmail Democrats into nominating "leftist" candidates--or else, they say, they'll waste their vote on third-party losers.

They don't seem to think a Fascist Reich run by Republicans is going to hurt them.

1/
They do seem to honestly believe voting for a Democrat is a gracious favor they might consider doing for the rest of us--rather than it being the only way to save democracy.

I truly don't understand how these people "think."

2/
Of course, it could be mostly trollbots and Russian psyops trollfarms spreading this nonsense. But apparently they think Americans are stupid enough to fall for it. Which again gets back to the question: Are people really that dumb?

3/
Read 6 tweets
Jan 15
I've been fighting this battle since 2015.

Sanders supporters are NOT "progressives", because they hate progress. They deride by by calling it "incrementalism" (as if that's a bad thing).

Real progressives have made progress.

All Sanders supporters have done is give us Trump.
To make matters worse, Sanders supporters (who pretend to be "progressive") constantly threaten to do everything in their power to make Democrats lose. Which means fascists will win. And then progress will not only stop, but leap terrifyingly backwards.
It's clear Sanders supporters are not "progressive." They vociferously object to progress, and claim a descent into fascism is better than moving forward--which is something done by "moderates," i.e., people who can get elected because Americans like them.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 31, 2021
Holy fuck.
We are roughly doubling the number of new cases every week. We're now at a half-million / day. In a week (1/6), we'll be at a million/day, then 2 million on 1/13, 4 million on 1/20, and and 8 million on 1/27.

1/
That means for the next 28 days, we could have an average of ( 8 / 2 = ) 4 million new cases per day.

4 million per day times 28 days = 112 million new cases (almost half the country) by Jan 20.

Do I expect it will really be that many? Probably not.

2/
Read 4 tweets
Dec 30, 2021
Lots of Twits seem to think there's some relationship between prosecutions and the midterms--as if prosecutions must happen NOW because somehow the midterm results could stop them.

I'm amazed so many Americans don't understand elections.

1/5
Neither the Executive Branch (where prosecutors live) nor the Judicial Branch (where trials happen) are up for reelection in the midterms.

Additionally, many cases being tried or considered are on the state level. The midterms won't affect them either.

2/5
Some of Trump's delay tactics may push some matters past the midterms. That won't stop anything, since the prosecutors don't work for Congress. The midterm results will have no affect on those cases.

But then there's the Jan 6 Select Committee.

3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(