One of my new interests on YouTube is watching "van life" videos, where people go on tours of the tiny houses they have crammed into old FedEx trucks and ambulances.
I can't drive and don't aspire to that kind of life. So why do I watch them? For spaceship design ideas.
Not "These are the voyages" type starships but what the inside of a ship owned by a solo spacer who had to fit their whole life into the biggest vessel they could fly (and keep flying) on their own.
One thing to bear in mind if you're designing a semi-realistic space vessel is that the craft is a closed system wrapped in nature's most perfect insulator. With a person inside, it needs a way to get rid of heat and humidity or it will just get hotter and damper all the time.
The popular portrayal is "space is cold", which means you can get away with portraying space is cold. But in reality, space is nothing. There's not anything there to be hot or cold. Hot stuff can be released into the void; heat itself cannot.
The good news is that if you've already got stuff like artificial gravity, inertial damping, and impulse drives, you've assumed future science can arbitrarily exert force on matter, which means you can also have a heat sink that perpetually cools itself while power is applied.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No, YOU spent an hour yesterday researching heraldic tinctures and attitudes to make a "blazon code" (cf. handkerchief code) for a sci-fi Omegaverse setting.
It's like... okay, the gender-equivalent dynamics of this world require people to be able to signal multiple statuses to each other, along with what they're looking for, in a way that's distinct and visible at a distance outside of pheromone range, and it has to be standard.
And then it's like, oh. There is an already existing visual language with standardized vocabulary that incorporates animals of different orders/ranks, postures, directional movement, with a limited but expressive color palette and room for additional notations.
This is not the first time that Donald Trump's liabilities have outweighed his assets to the tune of 9 digits. This is a "rich" man who has had negative wealth for decades at a time. Anybody reading this has probably been richer than Donald Trump for most of their life.
He's been able to live the lifestyle of a wealthy man even while having negative tens or hundreds of millions of dollars because he understands on a blunt force level how "wealth" functions in society. He knows how to act in order to be given access, assets, opportunities, etc.
He has spent decades following the same basic plan: get piles of *other people's* money in the form of loans or investments in business ventures that he has no idea how to run, live large on that money, let the chips fall where they may, and abandon ship.
Ever since I tweeted about how I keep getting served fitness-themed Oculus ads because they don't know how else to advertise to people who aren't poking into VR stuff that isn't games, all my Twitter ads are just, "Games? Oculus is so much more than games."
And to be clear, this isn't me expressing surprise or feeling creeped out. Twitter is the medium I typed those thoughts into, about the ads Twitter was serving me. It makes sense.
But their "Oculus is not just games" ad is still not addressing my interest, which is practical uses for VR besides game. The ad I'm getting now is some kind of packaged virtual experience from a POV aboard the ISS. Which is cool, I guess. But still largely a novelty.
Reminds me of insurers not having to reimburse tests if they're bought for "surveillance" purposes (i.e., if you go into a pharmacy to buy a test to see if you have covid, rather than going in *because* you have it).
These tests instruct you to take once if you have symptoms...
...so if we assume the thinking is constant across the board here that the government is only interested in paying for tests for people who probactually have covid, then two two-part test sets each are four separate tests for four people, if used as intended.
Please note that this is not a defense of the government's stinginess. Four of these kits per household distributed once would not be enough, and two definitely isn't, and the mindset where we only test to confirm what we already know is going to kill a lot of people.
I've got all the cats from all places in the Foundation that involved conspicuous puzzle elements I noticed but could not figure out the point of at the time. Luckily, I enjoy tooling around game environments with superpowers, getting into random fights.
Just hit me out of nowhere that "nonbinary" and "asexual" very probably mean the same thing to Tucker Carlson.
That's why he's labeling the very slightly redesigned M&M characters as "miserable, non-binary candy" in a rant where he's also explicitly talking about how they're not sexy. Gender == Sex, not just in the sense of "male" or "female"; Gender exists, to Tucker, for fucking.
He's seeing the same timeline where Ross Douthat labels it "decadence" (in the sense of a cultural decline) when Disney makes a movie that doesn't end with the identifiable girl protagonist married off to make babies ever after. In this world, queerness exists to kill off sex.