OK - opioids trial of US v. Larry Doud of Rochester Drug Co-operative nearing end, Judge Daniels has been asking defense lawyer Gottlieb why witnesses not ready, now a pharmacist on stand. Inner City Press covering the case & will live tweet as it can, thread below
Pharmacy owner: I signed up with RDC, it was easy. The customers were re-selling the pills, unfortunately.
AUSA: And your pharmacist?
Owner: He basically slept all day.
AUSA: Is this is a photo of him sleeping?
Owner: Yes.
AUSA: Did you fill prescriptions for Doctors like Suarez and Carl Anderson?
Owner(Paulson, of "Regal Remedies" on Staten Island) Yes.
Email is read into the record, about how many opioids were being sold, ending with "It's Staten Island, need I say more?"
story later
Paulson now on cross:
Doud's second chair: You don't actually know Mr. Doud, do you?
Paulson: I do not.
Doud's 2d chair: You signed a cooperation agreement just before trial, and surrender to jail, right?
Paulson: Correct.
Doud's 2d chair: You sold pills out of the back door of your pharmacy, didn't you?
Paulson: Yes.
Doud's 2d chair: You fraudulently held yourself out as a pharmacist, weren't you?
Paulson: Yes.
Doud's 2d chair: You filed false papers with RDC, didn't you?
Paulson: I did.
Doud's 2d chair: They wouldn't know the papers were false, would they?
Paulson: I dealt with doctors they knew were hot.
Doud's 2d chair: That's not my question.
Doud's 2d chair: You worked before at a pharmacy on 86th Street in Brooklyn, right?
Paulson: Yes.
Doud's 2d chair: And that's a working class neighborhood, fair to say?
Paulson: Fair to say.
No further questions.
Re-direct.
AUSA: Who sold you the drugs?
Paulson: RDC.
AUSA: Did they appear to be decieved?
Paulson: Not to me.
AUSA: No further questions.... The government calls its own paralegal as a witness.
Story later
Judge Daniels, to jury: I intend to finish with witnesses tomorrow. I won't have you come in Friday, I've heard there is a storm. Closing arguments on Monday.
Adjourned.
Again, story later - Mag court check-in first.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK - in opioids trial against Larry Doud of Rochester Drug Co-op, it's the final day of witnesses. Judge Daniels has criticized Doud's lawyer's argument about yesterday's cooperator. Inner City Press will live tweet, thread below
In the morning there was a Doud "character witness" who said she could not think of a single negative adjective to apply to Doud. Now an expert is disagreeing with / rebutting the government's / taxpayers' $900/hour expert Cutler of Harvard
Q: Was Larry Doud incented to sell controlled substances based on his compensation structure?
Objection!
Judge Daniels: Sustained. I'm not sure he's qualified to answer.
OK - it's US v. Avenatti, Day 4 of Stormy Daniels trial, with #Avenatti still cross-examining lawyer Macias about what social media posts he's read during the trial. Inner City Press is posting innercitypress.com/sdnytrial6aven… and will live tweet, thread below
Avenatti: Did you meet with the prosecutors on WebEx?
Macias: Yes.
Judge Furman: Is that a platform like Zoom or Microsoft Teams?
Avenatti: Mr. Macias, wasn't your home searched by the government?
Macias: Absolutely not.
Avenatti: Is it your testimony your office or home has not been searched?
Judge Furman: May we have a sidebar, Mr. Avenatti?
[Whispered sidebar]
OK - it's US v. Avenatti, Day 3, with Avenatti cross examining his ex-office manager Regnier and soon Stormy Daniels. Inner City Press is reporting twice daily on the trial innercitypress.com/sdnytrial4aven… and will live tweet, thread below
Judge Furman: Members of the jury, please remember that questions are not evidence.
Avenatti: Ms. Regnier, wasn't this payment for a case on which we represented children blocked at the US - Mexico border?
Assistant US Attorney: Objection!
Judge Furman: Sustained.
Avenatti: OK, the technology issue has been fixed. Let's go back to the previous month's records... Ms. Daniels was having a personal issue with her estranged husband, right?
AUSA: Objection!
Judge Furman: Sustained.
OK - opioids trial of US v. Larry Doud of Rochester Drug Co-operative keeps chugging along, alongside Judge Daniels' fairness hearing in an unrelated class action. Inner City Press covering the case & will live tweet as it can, thread below
Judge Daniels is ruling on prosecutors' request to exclude a slew of defense exhibits. He is allowing some in, "to demonstrate that at the time the defendant made his statements, he was not part of a conspiracy," or try to demonstrate that.
Defense lawyer Gottlieb: Any statements made by people about Lindencare being in compliance, they are not being introduced for the truth of the matter asserted --
Judge Daniels: I don't agree. It's not probative of whether Mr. Doud was involved in a conspiracy
OK - US v. Avenatti, Stormy Daniels case, Day 2. Literary agent Luke Janklow still on the stand, cross-examined by Avenatti's taxpayer-funded Federal Defender. Inner City Press is covering the case matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/in-stormy-da… and will live tweet, thread below
Federal Defender Dalack: So here you called Sally Richardson saying only $200,000 in first payment was "asinine publishing bulls*it."
Janklow: It's a colloquialism.
Federal Defender: And Mr. Avenatti wanted $300,000 up front.
Janklow: Yes.
Federal Defender: And you told Mr. Avenatti about "Fire and Fury." What's that?
Janklow: Another Trump book. It made a lot of money.
[Inner City Press: even with the free leaked PDF out there]
Federal Defender: You trusted Mr. Avenatti, right?
Janklow: Yes.
OK - opioids trial of US v. Larry Doud of Rochester Drug Co-operative still plugging along, on cross examination after day of compliance witness in the charged conspiracy. Inner City Press covering the case & will live tweet, thread below
Defense: Are you aware of any law that defined suspicious orders or orders of unusual frequency?
Witness: I'm not sure.
Defense: Were you aware that the DEA didn't even want registrants to tell it when they found red flags?
Witness: I did not.
Judge Daniels dismisses the jury. Now AUSA argues again, the DEA is not on trial, Mr. Doud is.
Defense lawyer Gottlieb: There were instances that RDC went out of its way to do compliance. Not a perfect job, but they did it.