OK - opioids trial of US v. Larry Doud of Rochester Drug Co-operative keeps chugging along, alongside Judge Daniels' fairness hearing in an unrelated class action. Inner City Press covering the case & will live tweet as it can, thread below
Judge Daniels is ruling on prosecutors' request to exclude a slew of defense exhibits. He is allowing some in, "to demonstrate that at the time the defendant made his statements, he was not part of a conspiracy," or try to demonstrate that.
Defense lawyer Gottlieb: Any statements made by people about Lindencare being in compliance, they are not being introduced for the truth of the matter asserted --
Judge Daniels: I don't agree. It's not probative of whether Mr. Doud was involved in a conspiracy
As US v. Doud trial day winds down, US says they could rest as early as tomorrow.
Defense lawyer Gottlieb says, While they're free to do whatever the heck they want, this is a change and we do not have a witness ready.
[In US v. Maxwell that meant, it's over]
AUSA reads venue stipulation. Now, the next witness:
Professor Cutler from Harvard University. A health economist. He says he is involved in a class action against Juul. "I match data up with death," he says, "so I can draw a picture."
AUSA: Are you being paid in this case?
Professor Cutler: Yes. I charge $900 an hour.
AUSA: How many hours so far?
Prof Cutler: Oh, I'm not sure. I'd say, 50 some hours.
[$45,000 so from, from taxpayers, to this Harvard professor also in Juul ca$e - story later]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK - opioids trial of US v. Larry Doud of Rochester Drug Co-operative nearing end, Judge Daniels has been asking defense lawyer Gottlieb why witnesses not ready, now a pharmacist on stand. Inner City Press covering the case & will live tweet as it can, thread below
Pharmacy owner: I signed up with RDC, it was easy. The customers were re-selling the pills, unfortunately.
AUSA: And your pharmacist?
Owner: He basically slept all day.
AUSA: Is this is a photo of him sleeping?
Owner: Yes.
AUSA: Did you fill prescriptions for Doctors like Suarez and Carl Anderson?
Owner(Paulson, of "Regal Remedies" on Staten Island) Yes.
OK - it's US v. Avenatti, Day 3, with Avenatti cross examining his ex-office manager Regnier and soon Stormy Daniels. Inner City Press is reporting twice daily on the trial innercitypress.com/sdnytrial4aven… and will live tweet, thread below
Judge Furman: Members of the jury, please remember that questions are not evidence.
Avenatti: Ms. Regnier, wasn't this payment for a case on which we represented children blocked at the US - Mexico border?
Assistant US Attorney: Objection!
Judge Furman: Sustained.
Avenatti: OK, the technology issue has been fixed. Let's go back to the previous month's records... Ms. Daniels was having a personal issue with her estranged husband, right?
AUSA: Objection!
Judge Furman: Sustained.
OK - US v. Avenatti, Stormy Daniels case, Day 2. Literary agent Luke Janklow still on the stand, cross-examined by Avenatti's taxpayer-funded Federal Defender. Inner City Press is covering the case matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/in-stormy-da… and will live tweet, thread below
Federal Defender Dalack: So here you called Sally Richardson saying only $200,000 in first payment was "asinine publishing bulls*it."
Janklow: It's a colloquialism.
Federal Defender: And Mr. Avenatti wanted $300,000 up front.
Janklow: Yes.
Federal Defender: And you told Mr. Avenatti about "Fire and Fury." What's that?
Janklow: Another Trump book. It made a lot of money.
[Inner City Press: even with the free leaked PDF out there]
Federal Defender: You trusted Mr. Avenatti, right?
Janklow: Yes.
OK - opioids trial of US v. Larry Doud of Rochester Drug Co-operative still plugging along, on cross examination after day of compliance witness in the charged conspiracy. Inner City Press covering the case & will live tweet, thread below
Defense: Are you aware of any law that defined suspicious orders or orders of unusual frequency?
Witness: I'm not sure.
Defense: Were you aware that the DEA didn't even want registrants to tell it when they found red flags?
Witness: I did not.
Judge Daniels dismisses the jury. Now AUSA argues again, the DEA is not on trial, Mr. Doud is.
Defense lawyer Gottlieb: There were instances that RDC went out of its way to do compliance. Not a perfect job, but they did it.
OK - US v. Avenatti, Stormy Daniels trial, Day 1. Her agent on the witness stand, describing wirings of $800,000 from St. Martin's Press. Inner City Press has been covering the case(s) innercitypress.com/unsealedsdny27… and will live tweet, thread below
Assistant US Attorney: Was Ms. Daniels aware of the referral fee?
Federal Defender: Objection, calls for speculation.
AUSA: Was the referral fee every put in writing?
Stormy's agent Lucas Janklow: No.
AUSA: On Mr. Avenatti's book, was he paid beyond the one part of the advance?
Janklow: No.
AUSA: Why not?
Federal Defender: Objection, your Honor, 401. May be approach?
[Whispered sidebar]
OK - now detention proceeding is US v. Jordan Nixon, Janessa Torres & Johara Zavala for assaulting a Delta security officer in a jetway at JFK Airport on Sept 22," one possibly intoxicated, & another refusing a mask." Inner City Press will live tweet, thread below
Assistant US Attorney tells EDNY Magistrate Judge Scanlon that between "9:00 a.m. and the flight’s scheduled departure at 12:55 p.m., the three defendants ordered approximately nine alcoholic beverages."
con't "Nixon began to tap on Employee-2’s head and removed his radio. Nixon then struck Employee-2 repeatedly with his radio as he struggled unsuccessfully to regain control. When Employee-1 tried to intervene to assist him, Zavala punched Employee-1 in the face"