EU spent the past month interviewing Lithuanian businesses who had been blocked from Chinese market, after the government in Vilnius permitted the opening of a "Taiwanese Representative Office" in the capital.
EU feels it has gathered enough evidence to make a case in Geneva.
A request for consultation will be lodged. China may or may not enter bilateral talks with Brussels. It will then go to a dispute settlement panel
Both parties are signatories to the MPIA, alternative to the defunct appellate body, so this one can't be appealed into the void.
However, worth remembering that the WTO governs live cases, so if China was to end the coercion campaign during proceedings, then the case would be dropped. "Cold comfort for Lithuanian exporters"," @mercuriobryan told me
Lithuania's trade with China is minimal, but it became even *more minimal* last month, when we saw 90%+ drops in exports to China compared to both December 2020 and November 2021.
According to EU officials, Beijing claims that there is no official boycott: these are patriotic businesses who don't want to buy goods from countries that question China's sovereignty, officials have been told.
There are a paucity of options available to Brussels - WTO the natural route to take, while anti-coercion instrument is in development
Confidence in the commission that ACI might be fast-tracked under the French and Czech presidencies of the EU this year, but no firm timeline
Comes amid a chaotic period in Vilnius, with multiple reports about the government wavering over the naming of the office. Usually these offices are called "Taipei" rather than "Taiwanese".
Here's what I have heard on that front…
As reported by Reuters, FM suggested renaming Chinese name, as seen in this pic I took in Vilnius. It literally translates as "Taiwan Representative Office" in Lithuania
The thinking was, to bring it in line with the English version "Taiwanese", therefore referring to the people rather than the territory. Maybe "台湾人民", but I don't see how that would have calmed things down.
The name in English is already what caused the problem
This was designed as a msg to some EU member states, to show that Lithuania is not intransigent and is willing to negotiate.
Some capitals are wondering out loud why Vilnius has picked a fight with China, esp now goods from Germany, France, Sweden etc caught up in blockade
This idea was never raised with the Taiwanese: instead it was put to the US, which (probably rightly) pointed out that it would make no difference to China and would be unlikely to soothe tensions.
So they recommended keeping the name.
It has been reported that the US has encouraged Lithuania to compromise on this issue. but I understand otherwise. The US has encouraged Lithuania to stand its ground.
Remember the backdrop: China policy is unpopular with Lithuanians, just 1% said they "strongly support" it.
Businesses are also kicking off, the President is at war with the Foreign Minister over it, there is pressure building - but the foreign ministry is now insisting there will be no change.
“We are not like other countries, which criticise others’ domestic affairs. We refrain from commenting on other countries’ domestic political development. So I will not comment on the internal discussions of our Lithuanian friends."
It's also worth noting some trends elsewhere: last week the Slovenian PM discussed hosting a Taiwan office of some kind in Ljubljana.
Afterwards, Slovenian businesses reported a backlash in China
A 3,000 page China bill finalised in Congress last night directed the govt to rename the the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office, to the “Taiwan Representative Office in the United States”
On "woke" politics and the deterioration in Western-Chinese relations...
On the CAI and complaints over perceived US hijacking of the investment deal
"When the United States competes with China and Russia, it needs Europe to be its sidekick, so the Americans have mobilized their own network of relationships."
At a press conference this morning, EU trade commissioner Dombrovskis says that the WTO case will be dropped if China responds positively to requests to drop the coercion
He is hopeful that the anti-coercion instrument's legislative process can be concluded this year under the French and Czech presidencies of the EU
EU DG trade @WeyandSabine has just presented to the @EP_Trade committee on a proposed forced labour ban, which would of course have serious impact on China, given issues in Xinjiang.
Some takeaways 🧵
Weyand and EC seem keen to avoid the US model, which combines product-based bans with origin bans.
So in the case of Xinjiang, cotton products linked to Xinjiang, and also just Xinjiang products in general.
The "rebuttable assumption" places "a heavy burden" on the importer, which has to prove that it has no traces of forced labour in any product it imports that may have connection to the region and its cotton + other goods
Chinese ambassador to the European Union Zhang Ming urged European Parliament President @DavidSassoli to “leverage” his role to sway opinion on landmark Taiwan vote
“I hope that you can leverage your role to enable the Parliament to fully appreciate the seriousness and sensitivity of the Taiwan issue and play a positive and constructive role in upholding the political foundation of China-EU relations,” he wrote in a letter dated August 31
He said the report was a “rather negative document” and warned that its recommendations would “constitute serious violations of the one-China principle"
NEW: European Parliament adopts first ever report calling on EU to ramp up relations with Taiwan.
580 for
26 against
66 abstentions
Landslide.
Vote pressures EU Commission to:
- Lay the groundwork for a new Bilateral Investment Agreement
- Express deep concerns over Chinese military pressure against Taiwan
- Change name of the European Economic and Trade Office in Taiwan to ‘European Union Office in Taiwan
It is not binding, but is a sign of the groundswell of support for the EU to intensify its relations with Taiwan.