Jamie Heard Profile picture
Jan 27 10 tweets 4 min read
Some tectonic shifts in the back of the LNG curve. 5yr+ contracts used to backwardate to US$6/Mcf; (we also spent some time at that price in the front back in 2019).

Some thoughts. 🧵
$6 long term LNG made sense if gas is abundant world. $6 LNG implies a ~$2.50 shale dispatch, or $3 Conv. If it was higher you could hedge it, drill your shale field, lock up your cargo and your return. Tokyo Gas Haynesville! Aka marginal cost of supply = $2.50 shale $6 floating
In 2021 we came to understand LNG demand is both stronger than expected, and holds far more upside risk than was previously priced in the forward strip. It's like the Brent "geopolitical risk premium" but instead its "don't freeze the Germans" premium.

This shocked near term S&D and has been written about at length... But the long term S&D is also strengthening which is very interesting because supply can actually respond to long term prices, while short term supply is pretty locked it (just can be reallocated)
I'm guessing on the S&D shifts but I think most would agree it's "D" leading the charge here on the change in long term view.
The new paradigm is asking for LNG 5+ yrs away at $9. This is a mix of risk premium, but also a potential change of opinion on the global marginal cost of supply. If producers need bigger returns to drill, they just got them. A US producer with a LNG contract can lock in >$5 gas.
This should give some pause... The market is offering 2027 LNG prices of $9 (HHUB ~$5.50). Liquidity in the market is thin but firm contracts are signed daily.

What growth do get in each jurisdiction? What returns do NAM shale producers generate (esp if they can't /don't grow!)
But... there is a disconnect. HHUB 2027 doesn't trade at the liquefaction + shipping discount of ~$3.50 to JKM. It trades at just over $3... The spread is wide and in this time frame is a capturable arbitrage.
The $9 price should incentivize a ton of FID's for LNG. That capacity should link the US and international markets. The marginal supply is 7 Bcfpd, a small % of the global market by then (10-15%?)
Result if you believe the current JKM mark and the implied global natural gas demand story.

2025-2030 NYMEX prices should jump from $3 to $5+
Gas NAV's and equity values effectively explode (2-3x)

Asymmetric bet of the decade in energy (in my view)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jamie Heard

Jamie Heard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JamieHeard5

Jan 26
Gas thesis - next 5 years. Poke some holes pls. 🧵

We are going from tight (2022) to balanced (2023) to potentially loose (2024) to very tight (2025 - 2026).

Bull points for 22
- Demand impresses
- Freeze off impact grows every year
- LNG > name plate

Balanced in '23?
Bear points
- Supply from Haynesville should be firm and growing (pls someone cap aethon and take them flat!)
- Permian associated back on the growth path
- No new material LNG
- Did $4 gas coax some tier 2/3 drilling?

Bull points 👇
Loose in '24
Growth continues with domestic demand doing all of the lifting... but change is on the horizon.

LNG Canada, Golden Pass, and 3 Mexico projects poised to launch in '25 + whatever other FID's we get in 2022

Any NT economic hiccup tightens gas (oil prod slows)
Read 11 tweets
Dec 15, 2021
2022 Energy Investment Theme Ideas: 🧵⬇️
#1: Quality vs Beta
Beta had "a year" last year with a big re-rate in commodity prices. Unless you are in the $150 WTI camp; 2022 is probably a "good but flat" price deck so rate of change is all about FCF capture.
#2 E&P & Royalty vs Pipes
In a lower growth world you are getting a much better return on capital proposition in E&P and Royalty than infrastructure company's that have high leverage and a decelerating dividend growth profile.
#3 Inventory
Consolidation was accretive at the low part of the commodity cycle. It can be accretive at the top of the cycle but a lot harder + there will be strips where the deal doesn't make sense

Own those that don't need to backfill locs at any cost

Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(