One thing most liberal activists still haven't figured out: if you're whining, it means you're losing. If you're whining about unfairness, you're REALLY losing. The general public does not care about "unfairness" in politics. If you want to win, talk like a winner, not a whiner.
You can spend all day complaining that the republicans rammed through a last second Supreme Court pick after blocking Obama's attempt at a pick, and you have a point, but NO ONE OUT THERE WILL CARE. You're just complaining to hear the sound of your own voice.
If you want to win any given political fight, you have to win over the people out there who don't have a political side – and by default they'd rather not get involved. If you're just whining about the unfairness of some maneuver, they'll just tune you out, and you'll lose.
If you're trying to help get Biden's Supreme Court pick approved, you do that by convincing the general public that it's a good pick, Biden is the right person to make the pick, the court should be more diverse to represent the American populace, and so on.
But you will not convince a single person out there to support Biden's Supreme Court pick, if your argument is that the Republicans did something unfair a few years back. NO ONE CARES. Right or wrong, they DON'T CARE. It's nothing but a LOSING ARGUMENT.
The ONLY reasons to go around whining about unfairness right now:
1) whining about your own side's past defeats allows you to enjoy feeling like a victim
2) you enjoy making yourself feel superior to the unethical GOP
Those both disqualify you as an activist.
As always in politics, do you want to whine and lose, or do you want to fight and win? Most of the "activists" on our side are broken people who just want to whine and lose. The question, as always, is how many of you are willing to counter that by trying to fight and win?
90% of people on our side spent the entire 2020 election whining about how Trump was going to win, rig, or steal it NO MATTER WHAT. Those folks didn't gain us a single vote, and in fact cost us votes.
10% of us talked like winners and put in the work, and won it for Biden.
Now we face a similar battle for Biden's Supreme Court pick. If most of the general public gets behind Biden's pick because we portray the pick as a winner, then no hijinks from Manchin or whatever can derail it.
But if we just sit back and whine, and we fail to sell Biden's pick to the general public, and that pick doesn't end up with a high favorability rating, then it'll open the door for hijinks.
If you're whining, then by default you're TRYING to lose.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When Spotify chose Joe Rogan over Neil Young, the defeatists said "that's it, it's over, all is lost." Palmer Report said the battle was just starting, and it would come down to money. Spotify has since lost $4 billion in market value. Told you the battle is just getting started.
Spotify's executives and investors now have to try to figure out if the lost customers and stock price plunge are temporary or permanent, and if it's the latter, whether it'll be more costly than dumping Rogan would be.
People can talk all they want about Spotify's $100 million contract with Rogan, but that's not a huge amount of money in comparison to the overall market valuations companies this size. It would be expensive to dump him. But it may prove way more expensive to keep him.
The doomsday pundits love to insist that famous people never go to prison. But Trump pal Joe Exotic has lost his appeal and will serve a 21 year sentence. When famous people avoid prison it's by never getting indicted to begin with. Donald Trump is being indicted in two states.
How do wealthy and powerful people keep themselves from getting indicted?
1) They're so popular, no prosecutor wants to touch them
2) Unethical campaign donation to the district attorney – but this only works if the public does't know or care that the investigation even exists
But the Trump indictment process is out in the open and everyone is watching, so no opportunity to quietly pay off the DA and make it go away. And in places like New York and Atlanta where Trump is despised, prosecutors would be seen as heroes for indicting him.
Warned you that as audiences started to figure out Trump is going to prison, the media would escalate its bullshit. Sure enough, not only are they still pretending Trump is running in 2024, now they're pretending Biden is so unpopular he'd need a Republican VP to have a chance.
This has reached the point of laugh out loud nonsense. First, Biden is WAY more popular than Trump and would be the overwhelming 2024 favorite. Second, Biden would be forfeiting the election by ditching Kamala and picking a republican VP. The media knows this but hypes it anyway.
The media wants to chase ratings in 2022 and 2023 by pretending Trump will be a factor in 2024. It can't do that if the public figures out he's a goner. So the media is getting even louder about Trump 2024, to distract the public from the increasing clarity that Trump is toast.
Andrew Yang set off my bullshit meter during the 2020 primary race when he started accusing the DNC and media of conspiring against his campaign (always a red flag). Now he says his imaginary new political party is “the party for positive masculinity.” Told you he was bad news.
If anything the media conspires against frontrunners, and props up less popular candidates, because it creates suspense and controversy and drives ratings.
When a low polling candidate blames the media for being unpopular, it’s never true, and means the candidate is dishonest.
And the DNC never conspires against anyone. The media just pushes that lie every election cycle in order to stir up controversy and ratings. And that lie actually benefits lower polling candidates – more proof that the media doesn’t conspiracy against unpopular candidates.
MSNBC is reportedly giving Stephanie Ruhle the 11pm time slot. She’s savvy, deserves it, will do well. But predictably they gave it to someone already under contract, after they got to dump Brian Williams’ huge salary. With ratings in freefall, it’s an industry cost cutting move.
Ruhle’s old 9am slot is being folded into an extra hour of Morning Joe. So MSNBC is filling the 11pm slot for the same salary it was paying for the 9am slot, and now it doesn’t have to pay anyone for the 9am slot. You’re going to see more of this if ratings don’t rebound in 2022.
MSNBC now gets four hours out of Morning Joe for the price of three, two hours out of Nicolle Wallace for probably the price of one, and since they were already paying Chuck Todd for his Sunday show they’re probably getting his weekday show for free or cheap.
To answer a question that the fretters and hand wringers are tossing around a lot right now: yes, it’ll be possible to seat an impartial jury for Trump’s criminal trials. You just need 12 people who don’t give a shit about politics. Millions of Americans fit that description.
And again, your brains are broken. You’ve gone from “Trump will never be indicted no matter what” to “Trump will never be convicted no matter what.” All this good news about Trump going to be indicted, and you just find a new way to baselessly spin it into something to fret over.
Yes, you can find twelve people in Fulton County or New York City who don’t watch political news, don’t vote, dont tweet, don’t care about Trump, and would strictly look at the evidence about whether he’s is guilty. Y’all fret just to fret. You enjoy thinking you’re gonna lose.