Check out our @WhiteHouseCEA thread on today's GDP report. A touch in the weeds, sure, but that's what we do! Allow me to elaborate this inventories point, as it potentially (important caveat) has outsized importance going forward.
As a change in a change, inventories can be the noisiest part of GDP growth, and we're very careful to recognize that one quarter does not a new trend make. But as our tweet says, it is suggestive of a positive development re supply chains.
IE, it may reflect some degree of supply chain unsnarling as companies better navigate supply chain disruptions to rebuild their inventories and create more buffer.
In fact, companies have reported changes in their supply chain practices, including changing the way they place orders with their suppliers, investing in warehousing to support increased inventory, changing delivery and order schedules.
Here's the full skinny on this, from the White House Supply Chain Dashboard. Check it out!
whitehouse.gov/nec/briefing-r…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jared Bernstein

Jared Bernstein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @econjared46

Nov 4, 2021
Great report out today from Moody’s, showing that @POTUS’s BBB proposal for care, climate, education, and more is more-than-fully paid for & boosts GDP, jobs, and the labor force.
moodysanalytics.com/-/media/articl…
The report shows how pro-growth policies, like child/elder care boost labor supply, GDP, & jobs. Adding impact of infrastructure bill, Moody's predicts more than 1.5 million more jobs on average, per year across the decade.
Also out today, official scorer (JCT) and US Treasury analyses showing how highly progressive tax changes in BBB raise more than $2t, which MORE THAN OFFSETS the cost of the bill. [Sorry to yell; this seems to not be well understood...]
home.treasury.gov/news/featured-…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 17, 2021
In recent conversations, I’ve been noodling on different ways to understand the costs and benefits of the $3.5 trillion reconciliation plan. In important ways, this topline number provides the least informative perspective.
First, that’s a gross number. It ignores the impact of “payfors” on the net cost. Over the next decade, that net cost is ZERO (ftr, the gross cost is ~1% of GDP). And those are highly progressive payfors that hit no one under $400K!
2nd, the investment component (as well as the tax cuts) spend out over time. Even if you ignore payfors (and pls don’t do that!), the gross $3.5t spends out over the next decade. EG: In year 1, ARP spent out 63%; in year 1 BBB+infrastructure spends out 6%!
Read 11 tweets
Sep 14, 2021
These poverty, inc, and hth ins data are last year's data, so their news window closes quickly, but before that occurs, pls read our thread. There are powerful policy lessons in here, including some relevant to current @POTUS agenda.
Gov't support made a huge difference to economically vulnerable households last year; direct impact checks were particularly potent. Middle-class inc fell last year and poverty rose if you ignore these benefits; the reverse if you include them.
IOW, policy matters and we know how to aggressively and effectively attack poverty and income loss. That old meme--'we fought a war on poverty and poverty won'--is demonstrably false if you account for anti-poverty policy (as does the SPM)! Image
Read 5 tweets
May 30, 2021
Just wanted to make sure every saw @ojblanchard1's thread on this "mini-revolution" in how we understand our fiscal situation. This goes way beyond budget wonkery and invokes smarter fiscal policy, myth busting, and even how progress occurs in economics.
The idea is to elevate real debt service to a prominent perch in the analysis of fiscal space. As @ojblanchard1 says, "this is what matters. If we have good uses for debt, such as the various forms of public investment in the Biden plans, this is the time to do it..."
Here's some background on the issue with links to a piece I wrote a ways back on the @ojblanchard1 paper that helped us get here.
washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/0…
See also @jasonfurman who's also made important contributions here:
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(