To keep global temperatures rising by 1.5C, we need to cut emissions by 30 gigatonnes of greenhouse gases every year until 2030.
30 gigatonnes = 30 billion tonnes
A car will produce around 24 tonnes over its life cycle
So 30 gigatonnes are equivalent to 1.25 billion cars. 🧵👇
We obviously can't get rid of 1.25 billion cars every year until 2030.
So how do we reduce emissions by 30 gigatonnes of greenhouse gas each year?
The good news is smart folks have figured this out.
If we focus on just 6 sectors, we can do it. 👇
Sector 1: Energy
The energy sector can cut emissions by 12.5 gigatonnes annually. And we don't have to wait for any new inventions!
We can do it by shifting to renewable energy and being more energy-efficient.
E.g. solar panels, wind turbines and LED light bulbs.
Sector 2: Industry
Industry can cut emissions by 7.3 gigatonnes annually.
Industry can do this by embracing passive or renewable-energy based heating and cooling systems, improving energy efficiency and fixing other pressing issues like methane leaks.
Sector 3: Agriculture, Food and Waste
New food production solutions can reduce emissions by 6.7 gigatonnes annually.
And shifting diets to a more plant-based (more sustainable diet) and reducing food waste can reduce emissions by more than 2.0 gigatonnes annually.
Sector 4: Nature-based solutions
By halting deforestation, halting the destruction of ecosystems and restoring them, the world can reduce emissions by 5.9 gigatonnes annually.
This would also improve air quality water quality and improve rural economies.
Sector 5: Transport
Transport is responsible for a quarter of all greenhouse gas emissions, and that's set to double by 2050 if we don't act.
The excellent news is 4.7 gigatonnes per year could cut emissions by:
• shifting to electric vehicles
• Walking and cycling more
Sector 6: Buildings and cities
By 2030 buildings will account for 12.6 gigatonnes of energy-related emissions. Most of those buildings haven't been built yet!
By making cities and buildings fit tomorrow and updating existing buildings, we can reduce emissions by 5.9 gigatonnes.
The information in this thread is from the UNEP emissions gap report.
Conservative's should be furious about the subsidies paid to fossil fuel companies!!!
Analysis by the IMF shows that fossil fuels receive $11 million a minute of subsidies. This is equivalent to 6.8% of global GDP, and it is forecast to rise to 7.4% of GDP by 2025.
🧵👇
A very good conservative argument could be made that the money used to subsidize fossil fuel production would be better off as tax cuts.
Surely you, the taxpayer, know better than the government (or fossil fuel companies) how to spend your money?
I raise this not because I have a problem with 'big government' but because it would be much better to discuss how best to transition away from fossil fuels, and the more brains we have on this, the better.
A few days ago, I shared my plans for writing more over the coming year. However, I didn't explain why I made these plans.
I think we should be talking more about solutions to climate change and how tackling climate change can improve lives today.
🧵👇
I want to be proactive:
Writing more and engaging more with others is in my control. Some might ridicule my writing and ideas, but others might find them interesting and perhaps inspire them to take action themselves.
We need to begin with the end in mind.
I think this has been missing in the discussions about climate change. There is no doubt that a +2.0C world would lead to more human suffering and deaths. However, this doesn't need to be our future; renewable's can give us clean air today.