1/ Your vaccine fanatic friend is too stupid to understand this thread, and your authoritarian government official is too power hungry to want the masses to understand it, which is why they both yell “vaccine disinformation.” It’s easier than to debate on merit, but please focus.
2/ California posted a chart that in late Dec 2021 into Jan 2022, “unvaccinated people were 16.9 times more likely to die from COVID-19 than full vaccinated people.”
The math you can see in the bottom: 6.5 is 16 times more than 0.4.
Please take a moment to observe the chart.
3/ On a similar basis, NYC shows you that recent deaths among the unvaccinated is around 30 times higher than among the vaccinated. 37.4 deaths vs 1.2 is multiple times higher.
Here again, please observe the attachments before reading the next tweets.
4/ Back to Cali: 6.5 vs 0.4 is a gap of a factor by 16.
HOWEVER, the 6.5 is 6.5 deaths per million vs 0.4 deaths per million.
Meaning, in the first group 99.99935% remained alive; in the “better” group it was 99.99996%.
Saying this doesn’t appear as scary as “16 times worse!”
In NYC it’s a similar game. Sure, 37.4 is many times over 1.21.
HOWEVER, this is 37.4 deaths per 100,000 unvaccinated people versus 1.21 deaths per 100,000 vaccinated.
Meaning, in the first group 99.9626% remained alive last week. In the other group it was 99.9987%.
6/7 The above is just to show how vaccine fanatics and authoritarians lie to themselves and to you to force you into action.
As a vaccine realist you can handle nuance and intellect while following sound medical advice. This thread is just for info purposes. Let me close:
7/7 Considering that the difference is at the tip end of 99.99+ percentage points among 100J people or 1 million people, imagine if just a few deaths are misclassified.
Indeed, such narrow differences are called statistically insignificant for a reason.
Thanks for reading.
PS 1/
Simple:
If your friend shaves off 5 minutes from a 100 minute trip by speeding and you shave off only 1 minute, the friend saved “5 times more” mins but your trip actually took only 4.21% longer.
The “times more” is how COVID and C19 vaccine data R dishonesty discussed.
PS 2/
The attached is an illustration of how a “50% reduction” of risk can in reality be the gap of 998 out of a 1,000 people doing fine versus 999 people of 1,000 people doing fine.
The “better” group is better by less than 1.1% but it can misleading be sold as 50% better.
P.S. 3
24% to 55% of recent COVID deaths in many US states are among the vaccinated. It’s STATE’s data (see thread in next tweet).
On a national basis this week, this would be 541 to 1,240 DAILY VACCINATED deaths.
What are we doing to help cut those 541-1,240 DAILY deaths?
PS 4/4
Here is a short thread of STATE-sourced data showing recent COVID deaths among C19 vaccinated.
True, true, it’s lower than among the unvaccinated but it’s still many deaths!
Vaccine fanatics kill an added focus on healthy living, therapeutics and better hospital care!
People have often rejected the claim that election fraud ("mistakes & errors") occurred in 2020 in the 100s or in the 1000s; which is a huge sum considering that states are often very narrowly decided.
Let's look at GA.
2/ Do date, Biden officially won GA by 11,709 votes which is a 0.23% margin among the 4.93 million votes.
How narrow is a 0.23% margin?
Well, let's read what the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) wrote on Nov 19, 2020 following a statewide manual recount:
3/ "No county had an error rate higher than 0.73% compared to their original results" in a state decided by 0.23%
If a manual, rushed recount uncovered in one place an error rate larger than the state's margin of victory, what would a thorough investigation statewide find?
I told you
I told you
I told you
I told you
I told you
PANTS PISSING Cons ran for the hills about the debate due to some fake mediaaa expectations and because, well, they are pants pissers.
👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼
The main attack by Harris was that Trump is a danger, unprepared and a joke to lead the country, yet 54% in the instant CNN poll have confidence in both candidates' ability to run the US, and Trump LEADS by 4 among those who have "a lot of confidence."
Her main attack FAILED!
While the main Harris attack (Orange Man Bad) failed miserably as seen in the poll results above, Trump connected Harris to the Biden Mess so effectively that Harris begged him to stop ("you are not running against Biden") and Trump indeed GAINED a net 4 on the economy:
1/ Biden-Harris admitted into the US 5.6 mill undocumented immigrants and millions more are not in the count, yet the @HouseGOP is too scared to dare Dems to shut the government to keep this mess going.
Instead, Republicans blame themselves by saying "we are not shutting down."
2/ If Republicans can't hold the line against something to the Radical Left of Dems from a mere 10 years ago, why run/win?
Where are the supposed principles?
Even IF holding the line here (and on impeachment) "costs" Republicans, well, gotta put Country Over Party. No?
3/ Republicans made immigration a big issue in #NY03 yet lost big time in the Special in part because voters don't see @HouseGOP as the fix to this problem.
Generic Ballot sucks for the GOP now too. Is it because the GOP is too harsh on this crisis? No. It's the opposite!
Below is the first Tweet-share by @RashidaTlaib since the news that Hamas, a government whose lies she spreads on speed dial, executed an American. No other tweet or tweet share as of now; 36 hours after the news broke.
Obviously, it is the opinion of @RashidaTlaib (and/or the opinion of many of her voters) that Hamas had a 'legitimate context' to execute an American last week or else she would easily tweet against it as she does to echo lies by Hamas.
@RepRashida @RashidaTlaib I am not outraged by Tlaib's lack of outrage on the execution of an American.
I am pointing it out so that people understand the poisonously-depraved world view of her "cause."
If she, a US-born & Elected Official is this depraved, imagine the views by those on the lower rungs.
Blame Corporate/Regime Media for propping up a dead economy; for hyping bad reports as good which impacted the thinking of Fed officials that with inflation not yet settled, the economy can absorb continued high rates.
When the economy was in recession in 2022 (two net negative quarters of GDP; meaning by the end of the second quarter the economy was smaller than before the first), we were gaslit that this isn't a recession. The term was changed in real time like in 1984 propaganda fashion.
As a result of the propaganda, consumers kept spending and the economy recovered; underpinned by federal spending, not by a "real" economy. Then, part time jobs gains at the place of full time ones were sold as all in the same; feeding the hype of a "good" economy.