On "woke" politics and the deterioration in Western-Chinese relations...
On the CAI and complaints over perceived US hijacking of the investment deal
"When the United States competes with China and Russia, it needs Europe to be its sidekick, so the Americans have mobilized their own network of relationships."
On strategic autonomy...
"They talk about strategic autonomy only when a non-white*-left president, Donald Trump, is in the White House"
This term white-left keeps popping up on translate, referring to "woke left liberals" it seems
On Tibet
"I have seen in Lhasa and other parts of Tibet that the Chinese government invests heavily in improving people's lives and preserving local traditional culture."
On whether Chinese and Western cultures need to "reconcile".
"I know that you are studying the theory of the great German jurist Karl Schmidt. In my opinion, studying his point of view will lead you to the correct conclusion"
The Chinese mission to the EU shared this interview on their weekly newsletter.
Would have to feel a little worried for whoever spelled Xi Jinping's name wrong in the same edition
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Very good read @JohnDelury: What China wants from Europe
"First thing Europeans must keep in mind is that at the level of grand strategy Europe isn't a priority. US remains the unavoidable great power China confronts... Beijing in a funny way has an America First foreign policy"
@JohnDelury "Strategically speaking, Europe comes after pretty much the rest of the world. European security is a function of US power, and therefore Washington, not Brussels, is the place for Beijing to look in calculating implications for its own policy."
@JohnDelury "Here’s what is so important about Europe’s status as fourth tier: China does not prioritise relations with Europe... there is no sign of a grand plan to wrest Europe from the American orbit... Europe is treated as an extension of America."
If anything, Trump-Xi talks have emphasised the tight spot the EU is in going into tomorrow's talks on export controls with China.
In order to lift rare earth restrictions for a year, Trump lowered tariffs, seems to have opened the door to Chinese investments, and paused probes
If Brussels wants to get the same treatment, it will have to offer something in return. But as an entirely legalistic entity, it's not clear to me that the EU could do this.
What would China want? The most obvious thing is lifting controls on ASML EUV equipment sales to China
China's envoy in Paris Deng Li confirmed this to @xiaofeixu this week
"Purchases of hi-tech European products, such as lithography machines would be one way to help balance trade, Deng said"
In a pointed comparisons, he said, 6 ASML machines = the entire EU pork export to China
Breaking: EU ready to retaliate vs China's rare earth controls, VDL says in Berlin
EU is "ready to use all of the instruments in our toolbox to respond" she tells Berlin forum
Comes after Macron on Thursday called on the commission to activate the anti-coercion instrument
"The decisions announced by the Chinese government on 9 October pose a significant risk. In essence, these actions would severely hamper other countries from developing a rare earths industry...
"This threatens the stability of global supply chains and will have a direct impact on European companies. If you consider that over 90% of our consumption of rare earth magnets come from imports from China, you see the risks here for Europe"
The Dutch government seems to have effectively frozen operations of Nexperia, the Chinese-owned chipmaker, citing national security, according to corporate filing today - via @zichenwanghere
@ZichenWanghere Nexperia’s Chinese parent, Wingtech, says it was blindsided.
It claims the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs issued an order on Sept 30 barring the firm and its global subsidiaries from changing assets, staff, or IP for a year.
@ZichenWanghere Days later, Dutch and German executives at Nexperia petitioned a court to suspend Wingtech’s CEO Zhang Xuezheng and place the firm’s shares under temporary court management. The court agreed — effectively sidelining Beijing’s control.
Disappointed to hear Kaja Kallas dismiss my July reporting as a "Chinese leak".
I'd remind Kallas that soon after my story came out, multiple respected journalists from Western publications followed with their own stories, confirming what I'd reported.
I know other reporters were briefed the same info that day, but I beat them to it by publishing my story first.
Versions of the story subsequently appeared in CNN, WSJ, FT, La Matinale Européenne...
Were they also being instrumentalised by Beijing?
I'll never reveal my sources, but the info was verified by multiple people in Europe. It stands
To dismiss it as a leak from Beijing, part of an effort to make Kallas and Europe look bad, is a cheap shot. I'm a proud European who's covered Europe-China relations for nearly 5 yrs
First Politico, now Euractiv comparing Europe's current plight to China's "century of humiliation"
Politico
"After defeat by the British in First Opium War, Qing dynasty signed a treaty in 1842 condemning China to more than 100 years of foreign oppression & colonial control of trade policy
Fast forward nearly 2 centuries, EU is starting to understand exactly how that feels"
Simon Nixon in Euractiv
"Talk of a European Moment has given way to fears of a European Century of Humiliation, akin to what befell China when it was ravaged by colonial powers in the 19th century."
Cites Nato Summit, "hopelessly one-sided trade deal", Xi refusal to come to BXL