It's wild how choosing people for jobs based purely on their skin colour and gender is still OK in the USA...
Not only is it OK, but many call it 'progressive' and brag about it. 🤣
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Not only is it OK, but many call it 'progressive' and brag about it. 🤣
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
It must be so demeaning knowing you only got hired because of your skin colour or gender... Not because you were the best person for the job.
I would hate that. It would be embarrassing and condescending.
It's offensive to everybody involved.
I would hate that. It would be embarrassing and condescending.
It's offensive to everybody involved.
It's not so different to how you would feel if you were rejected from a job because of your skin colour or gender...
Both are offensive and degrading.
If you pick the best people, 'diversity' is a natural consequence. Stop trying to meet quotas and over engineer everything.
Both are offensive and degrading.
If you pick the best people, 'diversity' is a natural consequence. Stop trying to meet quotas and over engineer everything.
Whether or not you like him, it's good that Obama got elected because he was deemed the best candidate. Fair and square.
They didn't just say "It's time for a black president!" and then go looking for someone who fit the bill.
That would have tarnished his standing and legacy.
They didn't just say "It's time for a black president!" and then go looking for someone who fit the bill.
That would have tarnished his standing and legacy.
If you GENUINELY believe in the capabilities of both genders and all different races, ethnicities, etc. you don't need to do this fake 'diversity and equity' nonsense.
Excluding 'straight white men' actually suggests they are superior somehow...
It's all backwards. Be normal.
Excluding 'straight white men' actually suggests they are superior somehow...
It's all backwards. Be normal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
