Christopher Such Profile picture
Jan 29 22 tweets 4 min read
A long(ish) thread on the teaching of reading comprehension in key stage 2. Just some thoughts and opinions:

1/n
Children are often asked to read a brief bit of text before spending the majority of the lesson doing an activity or answering a selection of questions. I don't think this is an effective (or engaging) way to teach reading comprehension. It's little more than assessment.

2/n
For those who aren't already sick of me saying it, the heart of teaching reading comprehension is shared exploration of worthwhile texts, modelling thinking and engaging in rich discussion. No selection of ready-made worksheets comes close to this.

3/n
This is not to say children should never answer questions or clarify their thoughts in writing. They absolutely should. But the vast majority of teaching time should be spent reading and discussing worthwhile texts.

4/n
Compared to a lot of lessons, teaching reading comprehension can feel reactive and exploratory. Lean into this. With practice, you will plan ahead better and hone your instincts on how far to explore unexpected tangents.

5/n
Spend planning time annotating a text, thinking about questions you'll ask and deciding how you will model your thinking. Trust that you *will* get better at planning these discussions if you stop relying on short extracts and questions on ready-made worksheets.

6/n
Ask yourself...

(a) What's interesting about this word, sentence, paragraph, etc?
(b) What might the class not understand here?
(c) How can I encourage students to have and share thoughts on this?
(d) What connections can my class make within this text and to others?

7/n
Often all the planning that is needed is an annotated version of the text that you will share with your class. I know it's a trite thing to say, but planning is the thinking you do, not the resources you create or find somewhere.

8/n
Exploring *the same text* is the sine qua non of whole-class comprehension teaching. Wherever possible, find a way to include every member of the class in this.

9/n
It's valuable to build children's reading stamina and independence. In upper KS2, ask children to read longer and longer chunks of text in silence before returning to discuss aspects of it. Some will finish quicker. They can be encouraged to re-read or summarise.

10/n
However, where an extract is particularly challenging, consider reading it aloud to children and letting them just consider the meaning without the decoding. (As a general rule though, children should probably do the decoding for themselves.)

11/n
While lengthy spells of reading and deep discussions might be more appropriate for older children in primary schools, all reading should have the derivation of meaning from text as a goal, even when working primarily on other areas such as fluency.

12/n
The word "might" is gold dust in classroom discussions. It can make questions much more welcoming.

There is a world of difference between "What does the author mean here?" and "What *might* the author mean here?"

13/n
Of course, sometimes stuff is simply correct or incorrect, but where possible express doubt and fallibility in your own views. Saying, "Maybe this means..." is a powerful way to take the pressure off children and invite discussion.

14/n
It can take a lot of time and effort to convince a class that you aren't always seeking a 'correct' answer. When you achieve this, however, conversations about reading can become pretty special.

15/n
Avoiding heavy praise for correct answers also helps to create the space for rich discussion. The children should see your eyes light up when they take a gamble and venture an opinion or an idea, not when they give you the correct answer to a closed question.

16/n
Through discussion, you will naturally ask children to visualise, predict, summarise, paraphrase, infer, etc. These are *not* generic skills, so don't worry about developing them as such. Focus on children's understanding (and enjoyment) of the text in front of them.

17/n
That said, it can be useful to model the monitoring of your comprehension.

E.g.

"That was a tricky sentence to understand. Let's read it again."

"Let's summarise what's happened in the story so far."

Etc

18/n
In short, read lots, model your thinking, ask thought-provoking questions, nurture an atmosphere of exploration and focus on helping children to understand the text in front of them.

That's it. Thanks for reading.

19/19
I've had some questions about how this kind of teaching allows for the clear 'evidence' trail that some school leaders insist upon. The short answer is that it doesn't. It is teaching that prioritises reading comprehension development over any such unnecessary considerations.
If you found the thread interesting, you might like my book. (All royalties will be going to a Give-Well registered charity):

blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/produ…
Alternatively, you might like this episode of @Kieran_M_Ed's TDaPE podcast: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/sea…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Christopher Such

Christopher Such Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Suchmo83

Nov 28, 2021
Apologies if I am repeating myself, but there is an elephant in the room when it comes to Ofsted's curriculum focus in primary schools: subject knowledge.

1/n
I strongly suspect there is little difference in outcomes between an excellent curriculum and a poor one if the teachers implementing it do not have good subject knowledge.

2/n
In the foundation subjects at primary school, I would say good subject knowledge is not the norm. (It isn't uncommon in the core subjects either, though lack of pedagogical content knowledge tends to be a much bigger factor here, especially in mathematics).

3/n
Read 19 tweets
Jul 26, 2021
A thread on why/how I wrote a book, which was released today:

Last summer I wrote a book. I'd planned to write it a few years from now, but my FSH-muscular dystrophy suddenly stopped me walking much more than very short distances, so I found myself in need of a distraction.
I have taught children to read in classrooms (and undertaken interventions) with every year group over the last 15 years. I also spent two years working specifically with smaller groups of children whose reading had badly stalled and desperately needed a restart.
Recently, I have delivered sessions for a local ITT provider following an observation of my teaching and an interview. I currently coordinate reading and the wider curriculum in a wonderful school (and have supported other schools in adapting their reading offer).
Read 18 tweets
May 1, 2021
We can learn a lot about the unforeseen consequences of assessment and accountability from the discussion on Edutwitter about text types in the teaching of primary writing:

Every day I read someone questioning the emphasis that is placed on the key features of a diary ... 1/6
...entry or on how to write a newspaper headline, and they are right to do so. Often too much attention is paid to text (stereo)types at the expense of clarity of expression.

A sensible question then is, "Where does this misplaced emphasis come from?" 2/6
I strongly suspect that it comes from the old Y6 writing SAT. When it existed, there were a substantial number of pretty cheap marks to be had for making it apparent to the marker that you knew the typical features of a given text type. Every child was trained in how to... 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Aug 23, 2020
Three points that are related:

1. The position that "in the end, you have to just follow your own style and teach whatever way you feel is best, based on your own experience and contextual perceptiveness" is one I understand and respect. However, due to the undoubted...
...complexity of teaching, it is also a position that demonstrates high confidence in one's own capacities. It might often prove correct (and we all think this way to some extent), but it's hard to paint this somehow as a particularly humble view of teaching.
2. If I share something on Twitter, and you honestly think it is flawed or there is a misconception behind it, please tell me. Praise makes me feel valued, but constructive criticism might make me a better teacher. Personally, when it comes to teaching I tend to trust...
Read 8 tweets
Jun 13, 2020
A thread on maths vocabulary:

I've seen a fair few resources in my career that attempt to associate mathematical words with specific operations. I've also observed numerous mathematics lessons where UKS2 children are taught to associate given words with operations and... 1/14
...to solve word problems on this basis. (Nonsense like RUCSAC encouraged such superficial strategies.) Unfortunately, such associations are, at best, often misleading. Take this question: "Amy has some cakes. She adds them to a pile of 3 cakes, making 10 in total... 2/14
...How many cakes did Amy have?"

The only discernible maths vocabulary here is "adds" and "total", and yet this is a question that requires subtraction.

When I have discussed this with other teachers, separating mathematical vocabulary from its context has often been... 3/14
Read 14 tweets
May 28, 2020
When it comes to reading in primary school, by far the most important question teachers and school leaders need to ask themselves (beyond phonics) is this:

How much time do the children actually spend decoding text?

I see lots on inference, summarising, etc, and this is...
...all useful stuff, but I suspect nothing is as important to outcomes as how much time children in your school actually spend accurately decoding text, either aloud, silently or guided in some way. This is the foundation upon which the rest of their reading will be built...
...and it is a question that receives far too little attention in my experience.

Many reading approaches seem to unintentionally mirror the KS2 SATs with roughly 25% time spent decoding & 75% time spent discussing/answering questions. Kids (especially in Y2-Y4) need to spend...
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(