As @marceelias notes, it also includes this absolute gem:

“Whether the federalization of election rules that Democrats were pushing in their voting bills would have made the system somewhat better or somewhat worse…”

What a bizarre piece of reactionary centrist propaganda.
I just wrote at length about why I find the “anti-alarmism” genre so unconvincing - but I was focusing on a liberal version that is based on a misunderstanding of the history of democracy in America. This is something else entirely: A reactionary anti-alarmist smoke grenade.
Yes, the author decries the “wounds inflicted on American democracy by Donald Trump and the Republican Party” - but that’s standard operating procedure for reactionary centrists and “moderate” conservatives alike: Declare Trumpism and multiracial democracy equally illegitimate.
The piece deploys the established tropes of “alarmism” and “both sides-ism” in an attempt to provide cover for the Republican project of entrenching white conservative dominance and de-legitimize the efforts to counter the assault on the political system with federal legislation.
I really want to know what the decision-making process at @TheAtlantic was like:

Someone says: “Wehner wants to write a bizarrely disingenuous piece for us, something clearly meant to obscure what’s actually going on.”

And whoever was in charge said: “Yes! Let’s go ahead!”
I greatly admire many people who write for @TheAtlantic; publishing this undermines their great work. On the institutional level, it reveals a degree of willful complicity in the anti-democratic assault on the political system that is actively hurting American democracy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Jan 31
It is worth diving into the conservative reactions to Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court. They reveal a lot about the conservative psyche – and why the announcement is important even though, as @ElieNYC notes, the Right will still control the Court: 1/
Conservative politicians, intellectuals, and activists certainly didn’t try to hide their disdain. Even though it’s unclear who the candidate will be, they already know they won’t support this “beneficiary of affirmative action” and fight against this “lesser Black woman.” 2/ ImageImageImage
If you bemoan “exclusionary criteria of race and sex” only if and when they result in the selection of someone who is *not* a white man, you’re telling on yourself. 115 people appointed to the Court in 232 years – 7 have not been white men. Seven. 3/ Image
Read 29 tweets
Jan 28
Matthew Yglesias learn the difference between a pandemic and an endemic situation challenge.

But hey, he’s “a little skeptical,” and whatever doesn’t immediately and intuitively make sense to the Arbiter of Reason, whatever makes him uncomfortable, must be derided as nonsense.
This type of pundit never starts from a position of trying to understand what strikes him (they’re almost always men, almost always white) as odd or surprising. He considers himself the arbiter of what is and what is not reasonable - often without much substantive knowledge.
This is indicative of a striking lack of humility and unwillingness to listen - which is par for the the course for a certain type of pundit. Yglesias, Silver, Mounk, Barro, many more like them: They don’t examine, they judge; they don’t reflect, they determine.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 27
On “anti-alarmism” - and why I find it unconvincing.

I agree we must not surrender to fatalism. But the authoritarian onslaught on the system is accelerating, as is the Republican Party’s anti-democratic radicalization. Yes, U.S. democracy is in acute danger. Some thoughts: 1/
This piece criticizes all the “keening and whingeing” in which Liberals are eagerly engaging according to @TimothyNoah1. While I agree that empty “Democracy in Danger” media rituals are not necessarily useful, it does not follow that the underlying diagnosis is wrong. 2/
I understand Noah’s exasperation. I’ve been getting a lot of “It’s too late anyway! Why do you still care?! Let’s all move to Canada!!” comments too, and while I don’t blame anyone for being frustrated and/or distraught, this attitude is indeed not going to safe democracy. 3/
Read 36 tweets
Jan 24
The Senate - “the world’s greatest deliberative body”?

Let’s abandon such mythical exceptionalism that distorts our perspective on history and politics. America can have the Senate in its current form *or* liberal democracy, but probably not both.

My new piece for @GuardianUS:
The U.S. Senate is deliberately and inherently undemocratic – an anti-democratic distortion that stands in the way of America finally realizing the promise of multiracial, pluralistic democracy. It is biased towards white people, with or without the filibuster.
In some fundamental ways, the Senate is working as intended. It has always been one of the most powerful undemocratic distortions in the political system – and not by accident, but because that’s what it was designed to be.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 23
This is from today’s “Defeat the Mandates” rally. We went down to the Lincoln Memorial yesterday, unaware that preparations for this event were already in full swing. They were blasting a song with the chorus “We don’t care what they say - It’s God over the Government.”
A little more form the lyrics of that song: “Prepare for war, ready for revolution - We don’t care what they say - It’s God over the Government.”

At the Lincoln Memorial. In the year 2022.
None of this is surprising. But I must say that the extent to which militant theocratic / fascistic movements are enabled to assert their dominance in the public sphere under the guise of “pushing back” against the government’s pandemic response worries and frightens me a lot.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 21
As is often the case with Biden (and many Democratic officials), we can only hope that he understands the “get along” stuff to be utter nonsense but considers it useful rhetoric / good politics - as opposed to actually still believing in the chimera of “bipartisanship”.
Unfortunately, as @perrybaconjr outlines in this great piece, the evidence suggests that what is on display here is not just politics and tactics, but a manifestation of deeply held ideological views that keep distorting the perspective on a blatantly anti-democratic GOP.
How can we explain that some establishment Democrats still insist a return to “normalcy” is imminent (any minute now!), when Republicans could not be clearer about the fact that they consider Democratic governance fundamentally illegitimate?
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(