It is worth diving into the conservative reactions to Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court. They reveal a lot about the conservative psyche – and why the announcement is important even though, as @ElieNYC notes, the Right will still control the Court: 1/
Conservative politicians, intellectuals, and activists certainly didn’t try to hide their disdain. Even though it’s unclear who the candidate will be, they already know they won’t support this “beneficiary of affirmative action” and fight against this “lesser Black woman.” 2/
If you bemoan “exclusionary criteria of race and sex” only if and when they result in the selection of someone who is *not* a white man, you’re telling on yourself. 115 people appointed to the Court in 232 years – 7 have not been white men. Seven. 3/
We need to start by acknowledging how flat-out racist and sexist these reactions are - so revealing precisely because they were so immediate, so reflexive. Misogynoir is the best term to capture the core of what is happening here. 4/
But on top of that, these reactions reveal something else too: They are evidence of how impactful Biden’s decision is – and why it was important to openly state the intention of nominating a Black woman instead of opting for the non-committal “someone qualified” version. 5/
It won’t change the arithmetic of the Court. But conservatives feel threatened by Biden’s pledge because they understand it acknowledges that having white men dominate the elite institutions of American life is a problem – and that rectifying this situation is a crucial task. 6/
Conservatives fear the acknowledgment that the country’s institutions should reflect the composition of the people; they understand that representation matters, that a Black woman ascending to a position like this is also an acknowledgment of past injustice. 7/
Conservatives see Biden’s announcement as evidence of how powerful the forces of liberalism, wokeism, and multiculturalism – these radically “Un-American” ideas that are threatening “real” (read: white Christian patriarchal) America – have already become. 8/
In this way, Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman is seen as yet more evidence that conservatives are losing, that conservative ideals are on the retreat. It is impossible to understand conservative politics in general without grappling with this pervasive siege mentality. 9/
The fact that a reactionary majority will dominate the Supreme Court for a generation doesn’t really alleviate those fears. Because the Right doesn’t look at the Court in isolation, but considers the judiciary as part of an all-encompassing conflict over the fate of America. 10/
Conservatives understand more clearly than many people on the Left do that this conflict isn’t confined to the political sphere, but plays out in all areas of American life: it defines politics, society, culture – and in some of these spheres, conservatives are indeed losing. 11/
The Right is reacting to something real: Due to political, cultural, and most importantly demographic changes, the country has indeed become less white, less conservative, less Christian, more diverse, more multicultural, more liberal. 12/
They are not just imagining the “threat” to their version of “real America.” The balance of political power doesn’t (yet) necessarily reflect that – even in well-functioning representative systems, power relations will lag behind cultural and demographic change. 13/
This lag or gap is very pronounced in the American context, as the U.S. system has many undemocratic distortions and is deliberately set up in a way that disconnects these changing demographic and cultural realities from political power. 14/
But conservatives understand better than anyone else that even with all these undemocratic distortions and the system’s pro-white-conservative bias in place, their vision of what “real” America is and should remain has come under pressure. 15/
Nothing symbolized this threat to white dominance like Barack Obama’s presidency - an outrageous subversion of what reactionaries understand as America’s natural order, made worse by the fact that he managed to get re-elected with less than 40 percent of the white vote. 16/
The Republican attempts to subvert democracy and erect one-party-rule systems on the state level are a direct reaction to this “threat.” Republicans are under no illusion about the lack of majority support for their preferred version of “real America.” 17/
The fact remains that they have secured a stable conservative majority on the Supreme Court, thereby guaranteeing that the Court will support the reactionary political project. But it is not just political power they seek, but cultural domination and affirmation. 18/
In the cultural sphere, the shift in power away from white conservatives has been more direct and more pronounced. The recurring rightwing moral panics of the past few years are evidence of precisely that shift, and how it terrifies white conservatives. 19/
The freak-outs over #MeToo, “cancel culture,” “wokeism” – they are reactions to the fact that traditionally marginalized groups have indeed gained enough political and cultural influence to make their claims heard and demand a modicum of respect. 20/
These are conflicts over who gets to determine what is and what is not accepted and acceptable in U.S. society, which has traditionally been the prerogative of a white male elite. That prerogative has come under fire, and it’s not something the judiciary can fully restore. 21/
It’s important to note that it’s really more the *threat* of losing privilege, the *potential* of being held to account that is animating these reactionary panics. In practice, the power structures that have traditionally defined American life have unfortunately held up fine. 22/
But still, it’s true that the position of white men at the top has never been questioned more, their privileged status has never been under more scrutiny. Put simply, being a member of the white male elite is slightly less comfortable today than it used to be. 23/
Against this broader background, conservatives understand Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman as evidence that the same dreaded forces responsible for the general assault on white male privilege are on the march and keep rising within America’s institutions. 24/
Whether or not that has any immediate effect on the Supreme Court’s decisions, for a movement centered around the idea that America is a white Christian patriarchal nation, a place where white Christian men have a right to dominate, a Black woman rising remains a threat. 25/
The Right is actually correct about one thing: Biden’s public pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court represents an affirmation of multiracial pluralism – a counter to the reactionary white patriarchal vision of the nation. That’s why it matters. 26/
It matters because it is an acknowledgment that the traditional dominance of white men was never the result of meritocratic structures, but of a discriminatory system, and that active measures are needed to dismantle that system. 27/
It will help redefine what the American political, social, and cultural elite looks like, it will necessarily reshape the ideas of who gets to be at the top in the collective imaginary of the nation. As multiracial, pluralistic democracy is under assault, that matters a lot. /end
Addendum: You wanted more evidence for the type of white male anxiety that I have tried to dissect in this thread? Fear not, Ted Cruz has got you covered.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Jan 29
As @marceelias notes, it also includes this absolute gem:

“Whether the federalization of election rules that Democrats were pushing in their voting bills would have made the system somewhat better or somewhat worse…”

What a bizarre piece of reactionary centrist propaganda.
I just wrote at length about why I find the “anti-alarmism” genre so unconvincing - but I was focusing on a liberal version that is based on a misunderstanding of the history of democracy in America. This is something else entirely: A reactionary anti-alarmist smoke grenade.
Yes, the author decries the “wounds inflicted on American democracy by Donald Trump and the Republican Party” - but that’s standard operating procedure for reactionary centrists and “moderate” conservatives alike: Declare Trumpism and multiracial democracy equally illegitimate.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 28
Matthew Yglesias learn the difference between a pandemic and an endemic situation challenge.

But hey, he’s “a little skeptical,” and whatever doesn’t immediately and intuitively make sense to the Arbiter of Reason, whatever makes him uncomfortable, must be derided as nonsense.
This type of pundit never starts from a position of trying to understand what strikes him (they’re almost always men, almost always white) as odd or surprising. He considers himself the arbiter of what is and what is not reasonable - often without much substantive knowledge.
This is indicative of a striking lack of humility and unwillingness to listen - which is par for the the course for a certain type of pundit. Yglesias, Silver, Mounk, Barro, many more like them: They don’t examine, they judge; they don’t reflect, they determine.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 27
On “anti-alarmism” - and why I find it unconvincing.

I agree we must not surrender to fatalism. But the authoritarian onslaught on the system is accelerating, as is the Republican Party’s anti-democratic radicalization. Yes, U.S. democracy is in acute danger. Some thoughts: 1/
This piece criticizes all the “keening and whingeing” in which Liberals are eagerly engaging according to @TimothyNoah1. While I agree that empty “Democracy in Danger” media rituals are not necessarily useful, it does not follow that the underlying diagnosis is wrong. 2/
I understand Noah’s exasperation. I’ve been getting a lot of “It’s too late anyway! Why do you still care?! Let’s all move to Canada!!” comments too, and while I don’t blame anyone for being frustrated and/or distraught, this attitude is indeed not going to safe democracy. 3/
Read 36 tweets
Jan 24
The Senate - “the world’s greatest deliberative body”?

Let’s abandon such mythical exceptionalism that distorts our perspective on history and politics. America can have the Senate in its current form *or* liberal democracy, but probably not both.

My new piece for @GuardianUS:
The U.S. Senate is deliberately and inherently undemocratic – an anti-democratic distortion that stands in the way of America finally realizing the promise of multiracial, pluralistic democracy. It is biased towards white people, with or without the filibuster.
In some fundamental ways, the Senate is working as intended. It has always been one of the most powerful undemocratic distortions in the political system – and not by accident, but because that’s what it was designed to be.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 23
This is from today’s “Defeat the Mandates” rally. We went down to the Lincoln Memorial yesterday, unaware that preparations for this event were already in full swing. They were blasting a song with the chorus “We don’t care what they say - It’s God over the Government.”
A little more form the lyrics of that song: “Prepare for war, ready for revolution - We don’t care what they say - It’s God over the Government.”

At the Lincoln Memorial. In the year 2022.
None of this is surprising. But I must say that the extent to which militant theocratic / fascistic movements are enabled to assert their dominance in the public sphere under the guise of “pushing back” against the government’s pandemic response worries and frightens me a lot.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 21
As is often the case with Biden (and many Democratic officials), we can only hope that he understands the “get along” stuff to be utter nonsense but considers it useful rhetoric / good politics - as opposed to actually still believing in the chimera of “bipartisanship”.
Unfortunately, as @perrybaconjr outlines in this great piece, the evidence suggests that what is on display here is not just politics and tactics, but a manifestation of deeply held ideological views that keep distorting the perspective on a blatantly anti-democratic GOP.
How can we explain that some establishment Democrats still insist a return to “normalcy” is imminent (any minute now!), when Republicans could not be clearer about the fact that they consider Democratic governance fundamentally illegitimate?
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(