This is a diagram of a lightning protection for power supply device/patent.
Acronyms correct?
TVS Transient-voltage suppressor
MOV Metal Oxide Varistor
GDT Gas Discharge Tube
Fu1-Fu3 main protection fuses
L1, L2, L3, L4 decoupling components
2. Acronyms?
PE = Protective Earth (equipment side earth)
Lin = live in
Lout = live out
Nin = neutral in
Nout = neutral out
Any issues or potential problems with such a circuit?
Will TVS fail catastrophically if high voltage (via lightning) lasts for even a few seconds?
3. Fracturing or Fire damage to MOVs?
1. MOVs are prone to catching fire in cases of extended current surges.
2. How many surges can they handle?
Seems that No one knows until failure occurs, right?
Case in China (multiple return lightning strokes)
" multipulse lightning surge is often the driver for the temperature rise since it causes energy to accumulate in the MOV due to its long thermal time constant..leading thermal damage & cracking"
"GDTs can be damaged by extreme exposure to lightning. The typical failure mode is an increase in voltage at which the GDT conducts (or protects), or complete catastrophic failure for severe exposures"
Will this device/patent definitely protect sensitive electronic devices against overvoltage transients in normal mains voltage and repeated nearby lightning strike overload/ short circuit events?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.
1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED
"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."
"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.
"Of note, the spike protein of this novel bat coronavirus possesses a functional FCS at the S1/S2 junction with a unique amino acid sequence motif (RDAR) that differs from that found in SARS-CoV-2 (RRAR) by only 1 amino acid."
"The molecular biology capabilities of WIV & the genome assessment are consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus that was part of a bank of chimeric viruses in Zheng-Li Shi's laboratory at WIV that escaped from containment"
Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created full-length a infectious clone in pBAC-CMV using an unpublished bat Coronavirus genome as template (BatCoVX)
page 85
3. Hypothesis 3:
Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created chimeric Bat-CoV-X viruses using the pBACCMV-BCOVX backbone and swapping out key cassettes with other bat Coronaviruses (RBD, RBM, etc.) and adding additional features such as a furin cleavage site