Thread by @SteB777

Our system is broken. The Prime Minster is a shameless liar abusing House of Commons rules to tell lie after lie, knowing very well, no MP can point this out, as it is against House rules, to say another member is lying, even when they self-evidently are.
1/

https://twitter.com/SteB777/status/1488197753570271235

It is not my opinion that Boris Johnson has seriously misled the House and has made no attempt to correct the clear cut false statements he has made to the House, again and again. What's more this well precedes so called "partygate".
2/

https://twitter.com/PeterStefanovi2/status/1459541907772780546

Our system is broken, because self-evidently if the PM makes extremely false and misleading statements to the House of Commons, and makes not attempt to correct these false statements, nothing can be done.
3/

The whole system relies on the PM having a conscience and admitting he made a false statement. However, when the PM is a shameless liar and simply doesn't care that he is telling bare-faced lies in public, self-evidently the system doesn't work.
4/

Because unless the police go to No.10 and drag Johnson out on chargers of misconduct in a public office or perverting the course of justice, he will just carry on telling bare-faced lies, and his shameful supporters will support him.
5/

The whole tradition our government is based on is a simply assumption and the ministerial code enshrines this - it assumes that those in high office, like the PM, will resign if they mislead the House. But as we can see, this relies on said minister or PM, having a conscience.
6/

If the PM lacks a conscience, is a shameless liar, and just carries on lying and making false and misleading assertions, as today, there is nothing which can be done. The House rules, assume no PM could be so dishonest.
7/

The House rules that demand no member can call another a liar or say they deliberately misled the House is a charter to facilitate bare-faced and shameless liars. Trying to claim the rules are the rules is a false argument. No rule overrules fact, truth and evidence.
8/

As I say, when Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle ordered Ian Blackford to say that Boris Johnson "inadvertently misled the house" instead of Johnson deliberately misleading the House, he was in essence demanding Ian Blackford lie and mislead the House.
9/

When such an event happens, you know the system is broken. At the very least Sir Lyndsay Hoyle should have at least acknowledged this, because he knows very well that Johnson has deliberately misled Parliament, and has made no attempt to correct what he said.
10/

If the House of Commons facilitates a shameless, bare-faced pathological liar like Boris Johnson, and ejects anyone for saying an obvious truth about this, demanding they lie to deny what is going on, the system is broken.
11/

No system, no set of rules, should facilitate bare-faced lying and suppress those simply trying to point to the truth and facts to House and public, and then demand they lie, to cover up the shame of what those rules and that House is facilitating.
12/

The House of Commons proceedings are televised, so if an MP is forced to say someone "inadvertently misled the House", when they mean that member, deliberately misled the House, this is seriously misleading the public. They are being forced to say things they don't believe.
13/

If the contrivance is that the PM is incapable of knowing he is lying, then self-evidently he is mentally unfit to do the job, and should be immediately removed from office.
14/

Any system that facilitates lying, and protects liars is corrupt. Both actually corrupt, and morally corrupt and morally bankrupt.
15/

There has long been a very simple remedy to this problem and that is to make all members of the House of Commons swear an oath to tell the truth, similar to that of witnesses in legal cases, adjusted of course to the context.
16/

That if an MP inadvertently misleads the House, that they must as soon as they become aware of this, make a full correction at the earliest opportunity, and if need be apologise.
17/

However, if there is strong evidence to suggest that this false assertion cannot have been a mistake, like repeatedly lying about parties you attended, or that happened in your flat, an apology does not suffice. That they should then face criminal charges, and a trial.
18/

There's nothing remotely unreasonable or oppressive about this. When an ordinary person has to fill in an official form, it is usual for that person to have to sign a declaration of truth and to face criminal charges if they lied.
19/

It is utterly bizarre that those in the highest offices, can blatantly mislead the House of Commons and the public, and to go on lying and lying with impunity. Then to be protected by the House rules.
20/

@GeorgeMonbiot @JolyonMaugham @PeterStefanovi2 @peterjukes @AyoCaesar @carolecadwalla @CarolineLucas