Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Feb 2 23 tweets 5 min read
I'm alarmed at how most people don't understand the danger our democracy is and are focusing on the wrong part of the scandal.

Never before has a British PM being allowed to tell one barefaced lie after another to parliament, and to not be properly challenged about it.
1/🧵
This is not just another scandal. This is unprecedented in the history of British democracy. Yes, it has been alleged that other British PMs lied or misled parliament. But this is the thing, there has never been clear cut evidence to contradict them.
2/
Before I go on, I will make it crystal clear why this is so serious and dangerous. If a British PM is allowed to lie time and again to the House, without challenge, there is the very serious danger we could sleep walk into a dictatorship.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
This cannot be solved by Boris Johnson merely resigning. What's done and allowed to get away with, demonstrates that there are no adequate checks and balances to stop an authoritarian and lying PM (the 2 got hand in hand) from taking over our democracy.
3/
In other words, there is nothing to stop Johnson's successor of imposing authoritarian dictatorial rule over us, and as the Conservative Party have openly demonstrated, they have no regard for the truth or ethics, and it is win at all costs.
4/
Only just over a month ago, in the House, Boris Johnson angrily denied in the House, that there had been any parties in Downing St, he was aware of and all events there complied with COVID regulations at the time.
5/
Somehow we have gone from that, to numerous parties being uncovered, photographs of them, Boris Johnson attending many of them, to discussions about whether the government will keep secret who gets COVID fines.
6/
Self-evidently, Boris Johnson did like again and again to parliament (not for the first time either) and any denial of this, like let the investigations finish, is monstrous gaslighting of the public.
7/
Neither the PM, nor the cabinet, nor Tory backbenchers, need a none independent, non-judicial report, to know whether the PM was at parties and that they breached COVID regulations.
8/
The difference between Boris Johnson and any previous PM, is that none would have denied what they know could easily be proven, barefaced lying. They would have simply gone no comment, before commissioning an inquiry.
9/
Boris Johnson and his Tory co-conspirators are angrily telling everyone not to pre-empt Sue Gray's full report or the police investigations. However, it is they who overtly stated there had been no parties and no breaches of COVID laws and regulations, multiple times.
10/
You can't go around trying to pre-empt any inquiry, by trying to gaslight the public AND THE POLICE, that there had been no parties, no COVID breaches, and then complain about the opposition contradicting these bare-faced lies.
11/
According to the @GoodLawProject "letters between it and the Met, police said they had “relied on the government’s assurances that no rules had been broken”. If that is true, this is a clear case of perverting the course of justice.
12/
theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/j…
I have absolutely no faith whatsoever, in the Met to objectively investigate this case, as both misconduct in public office and perverting the course of justice, carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. I think there is very little chance such charges would be made.
13/
Time and time again, we have seen the police refuse to investigate or bring appropriate charges against those in high office or connected with them, with no proper explanation. They are extremely deferential and see their job as to protect government, not bring it down.
14/
Undoubtedly, this is what Boris Johnson is relying on. That police will not bring appropriate charges against those at the top, for fear it will bring the government down and bring the establishment into disrepute with the public.
15/
The problem is if this happens, and Boris Johnson seems to be actually testing this out, pushing the envelope to the maximum, to see how much he can get away with, without being challenged, we are in real danger of heading into a dictatorship.
16/
This is how dictatorships happen, when the so called checks and balances of a democracy fail to hold a would be dictator to account for their criminal actions, to they push it further and further.
17/
It's not me saying this. Academic experts are warning that the US is heading towards a right wing authoritarian dictatorship in the near future, because of the complete failure to hold Trump to account for his barefaced lying and criminality.
18/
theguardian.com/us-news/2022/j…
Wake up and smell the coffee before it is too late. The only way to prevent this, is for those at the very top, to be held to the same standards, laws and regulations, as all other citizens. Allowing those at the top to openly flout the law, is the route to dictatorship.
19/
For crying out loud, snap out your complacency, and stop treating this like just another scandal. What we saw the other day, when an opposition leader was stopped from calling the PM a liar and ordered to lie, was the route to dictatorship.
20/
@threadreaderapp Please unroll?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

Feb 1
It is my contention that the climate and ecological emergency, all injustice, dictatorial regimes etc, are all facilitated by one singular thing and that is LYING TO THE PUBLIC to seriously mislead them. That the system as it is facilitates this lying by the powerful.
For clarity, I am saying the system as it is, which was designed by the powerful for their own benefit, has built in mechanisms to protect powerful liars, and to stop anyone properly challenging them. That the media are complicit in this. That is must be changed.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 1
This is very important to understand.

It's all very well to have a principle which forbids an MP from accusing another of lying. It is quite another thing to demand an MP say that false statement was inadvertent.
1/🧵
To insist as happened yesterday, when Sir Lindsay Hoyle insisted that Ian Blackford MP, say Boris Johnson "inadvertently misled the House", was in effect a demand that Ian Blackford lie to the House of Commons and mislead the public who were watching.
2/
To say that an MP's false statement was "inadvertent" i.e. accidental, is a positive statement of fact. It would be highly misleading if that statement were not true, a knowing lie - if the MP making the original the false statement, was knowingly lying.
3/
Read 27 tweets
Feb 1
I want to very quickly explain why I was absolutely certain Boris Johnson was going to become very unpopular, very quickly, in about 2-3 years after the December 2019 General Election. I am not psychic.
People with ingrained personality disorders tend to behave in the same way throughout their life. They keep behaving in the same way over and over again, and just can't stop themselves. See this for proof.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
Boris Johnson has 2 primary behavioural traits, which made this scandal entirely predictable.

1) He behaves recklessly as if rules don't apply to him, meaning he will get involved in one scandal after another. He ever learns from experience.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 1
This is my take on why the Metropolitan Police left it so long before suddenly mounting an investigation, just before Sue Gray's report was ready for publications. Up until this point, the police were quite happy to say, let's see Sue Gray's report first.
Then for whatever, reason, the police launched a sudden investigation, just before the publication of Sue Gray's report. As I explained, there was a very simple explanation for this. That a number of Downing St police officers, had been only too willing to speak Sue Gray.
It was widely reported 8 days ago, that Downing Street police were only too willing to speak to Sue Gray, even though they could not be compelled to speak to her. That they'd given Sue Gray damning evidence.
mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
Read 11 tweets
Jan 31
Our system is broken. The Prime Minster is a shameless liar abusing House of Commons rules to tell lie after lie, knowing very well, no MP can point this out, as it is against House rules, to say another member is lying, even when they self-evidently are.
1/
It is not my opinion that Boris Johnson has seriously misled the House and has made no attempt to correct the clear cut false statements he has made to the House, again and again. What's more this well precedes so called "partygate".
2/
Our system is broken, because self-evidently if the PM makes extremely false and misleading statements to the House of Commons, and makes not attempt to correct these false statements, nothing can be done.
3/
Read 21 tweets
Jan 31
Absurdly, the Speaker of the House, Lindsay Hoyle, is repeatedly demanding Ian Blackford, leader of the SNP withdraw his comments that Boris Johnson lied and misled the House of Commons, and to replace it with "inadvertently misled the House". Then ejecting him from the House.
This is everything wrong with politics in Britain. Every person, even Johnson, knows darn well that Johnson lied and lied and deliberately misled the House. Yet MPs are forced to say it was inadvertent, which itself is a huge and serious lie.
Therefore not only is the PM allowed to provably lie and lie to the House of Commons, but all MPs are demanded to go along with the lie that Johnson's lies weren't lies at all, but that they were inadvertent mistakes i.e. not lies.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(