“Our rich societies would not function without immigration, so we must not see it purely as something that ‘happens to us’, but as a complex and natural process in which we are a disproportionately powerful player and have the levers to manage it in a way that benefits us all.”
These levers are something I discussed as well in my here last week - we pay countries all around the world to violently close their borders, stifling the benefits that mobility would bring to those parts of the world novaramedia.com/2022/01/24/the…
I know that you hate the injustice of a world where the accident of where you were born decides your rights, your chances, sometimes whether your children will even live.
It has become so difficult to believe the world could be different, but we must never accept it as it is
As long as we see ourselves as a trembling fortress out to the West of Europe, facing the forces of the world alone, we’re lost. Free migration is not just about all the world showing up at your front door, think about someone other than yourself & your backyard for once!
The more people can move around to where there’s work or safety without losing all their rights as soon as they step out of one arbitrarily drawn line on the map, the more we strip away the enormous incentive to risk everything, down to your very life, to get further.
We’ll never end global mobility, but we can give people back the right not to move as well, as the evidence shows most people, globally, don’t want to move, or at least not far.
Only if we harness the opportunity that those who do move bring, instead of repressing it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Of COURSE it makes sense to say work from home if you can but to still allow Christmas parties
It's about REDUCING contact. Prioritising our social gatherings over sitting at a desk unnecessarily is obviously preferable. What is this inane puritan streak in this country #r4today
Sajid Javid is "not quite sure" why Allegra Stratton resigned for laughing at a party that supposedly didn't happen LOL #r4today
Of course the "investigation" by Simon Case is the get out clause that allows them to say "I'm not going to preempt the findings" ffs. What a slippery, duplicitous lot. #r4today
Horrible report of how rights of women have been ripped up by the Taliban in the months since it took over.
No surprise Afghanistan has now overtaken Syria as the biggest country of origin for asylum seekers in Europe. Meanwhile our govt voted yesterday to push them out #r4today
If when Donald Trump was president he had enacted a law to allow him to push back refugees at sea *explicitly* without regard for international maritime law, every one in the country would know about it & be outraged.
Happens here in our own government? Tumbleweed. #r4today
They have explicitly refused to put in law that they must not endanger lives at sea.
27 people drowned & they declared themselves “horrified” & we’re supposed to buy it?
They have the actual gall to say their approach is about saving people from “dangerous journeys” #r4today
There are genuinely so many ways in which the #AntiRefugeeBill is going to ruin people's lives. It wont even be possible for me to cover half of it.
The list of new clauses & amendments they will debate in parliament today, only on ONE section out of 7 barely fits on my screen.
British democracy: Where our parliamentary representatives get about five minutes per life-ruining, justice-denying, cruel, ineffective, barbaric measure in the #AntiRefugeeBill.
For those interested in why 51 is highlighted up there, it's one of the government's new ones. Snuck in last week so most wont even hear about it, yet it's one of the worst of them.
It imposes a four year prison sentence on anybody who is unable to renew their immigration status
They're going to be banging on about Channel crossings in parliament all afternoon.
Brace for a bad time. Small comfort is that the government will have a bad time too. I'd imagine the opposition will largely hate it and come out pretty badly as well.
A bad time for all. Great.
Home Office orals followed by a UQ on Channel crossings brought by Labour's Shadow Home Sec. I may tweet along a bit if I can bare to. No guarantees. Anyway what could there possibly be that's new to say about this whole nasty mess?
Andrew Gwynne asks why decision making on asylum claims has become so much more slow? Just 20% made within 6 months, while in 2014 87% were made within 6 months.
Patel lies saying that there are solutions to speed up the system in her Anti-Refugee Bill. There are not.
Tom Purseglove (Immigration Minister) appearing at the HASC this morning.
Cooper starts with a factual question: The number of asylum claims this year and last year.
Purseglove: In the year ending July 2021 - a 4% reduction in the number of asylum claims in the UK.
Purseglove: Channel crossings are being deployed from a longer stretch of coastline and taking greater risks
This is in line with the evidence: When governments clamp down on irregular journeys without providing an alternative route, crossings are displaced, they don't stop.
Cooper draws his attention to the Home Office Action plan from 2019 that pledged to halve the number of small boats crossings by the Summer.
The government's approach is not working. It is making the situation worse.