OK, @SDNYLIVE - during lull before US v. Avenatti charging conference, Inner City Press is covering and will live tweet a criminal case, US v. Crawford - the defendant is appearing virtually from prison, and he's swearing. Thread below
Defendant: What the f*ck is this, you gotta talk about me?
CJA Lawyer: It's called a status conference.
Defendant: I got six stitches in my head.
CJA Lawyer: That's from when you got picked up?
Defendant: No, it happened in here. January 13.
Defendant: Y'all coulda just done this sh*t on your own. You don't need me here.
CJA lawyer: You have a right to be informed.
Defendant: How I got rights when I'm wrong. I got two kids. Every time they turn around I'm in f-ing prison.
Defendant: What's the charges?
CJA lawyer: Violation of supervised release.
Defendant: Oh yeah? What I did to violate? Ask the US Attorney, she know? What the F I did?
CJA lawyer: It's actually probation that knows... Use of marijuana, change of residence.
Defendant: Do you here how much B.S. you just said? Didn't talk to a re-entry specialist? Who the hell is that? Y'all just keep making up new charges.
CJA lawyer: Someone called a re-entry specialist was going to help you get a job.
Defendant: Called?
CJA: This is to get you the help you need.
Defendant: The help I need? I need y'all to leave me the F alone.
Judge: This is the judge. Who is on the phone?
Defendant: Who the F you think is on the phone?
Judge: Counsel, it seems you haven't spoken with the defendant to explain --
Defendant: I don't trust him. He is working with the US Attorney. I'm gonna talk to all of y'all.
Judge: Have you gotten the defendant a copy of the specifications?
CJA lawyer: We went through the presentment on January 5, Magistrate Lehrburger, with some difficulty
Defendant: Why you call my family? That's a violation of attorney - client privilege, MF-er! Y'all sent the Marshals to put guns in my face!
CJA lawyer: I would like to have this case wrapped up next week. There have not been in-person visits at the MDC. Phone consultations are not helping.
Defendant: And if I get out I'm still gonna be homeless! What the F am I gonna do?
CJA lawyer: We could find a program.
Defendant: What f-ing program?
Judge: Next one must be in person. As far as I'm concerned we could have a trial --
Defendant: That's what I want! A MF-ing trial!
Judge: These things can be established by probation.
Judge: I'll get back to counsel. I'm going to end this now.
Defendant: I ain't nobody's slave, MF!
[Loud sound]
Voice: "Hello, MDC Brooklyn, how can I help you?"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Inner City Press

Inner City Press Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @innercitypress

Feb 3
OK - it's US v. Avenatti Day 9, jury deliberations day 2 - no movement at all,courtroom silent. But Inner City Press is on alert, live tweeted thread below as appropriate. Here's a hybrid story: innercitypress.com/literary7genoc… and hotdog story: innercitypress.com/sdnytrial17ave…
Something is afoot - the lawyers are gathering in the courtroom; prosecutors sitting, Avenatti standing up. Drumroll.
It's said, "There's a note." (If so, not yet the verdict). Lawyers are huddled together discussing it. Judge Furman not yet in the courtroom.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 3
OK - now Sarah Palin v. NYT starts with Judge Rakoff hearing arguments on what can be included in opening statements. Inner City Press, on alert for Avenatti verdict, is covering Palin v. NYT innercitypress.com/sdny44krakoffp… and will live tweet, thread below Image
Lawyer: I have a question on voir dire. Do you allow back striking?
Judge Rakoff: I don't know what that is. Let me explain how I choose juries, as they were in this court for 50 years, good enough for Learned Hand, good enough for me.
Judge Rakoff: We have 82 jurors. Because of COVID, some in a separate room. We're choosing 9. I question the first 9. Maybe 1 or 2 is excused for cause. Number 10 moves up. Then each side gets three challenges, in rounds. See you at 10. Thread will continue.
Read 25 tweets
Feb 2
#Breaking, #verdict: in the opioids trial of US v. Doud (CEO of Rochester Drug Co-op) there is a verdict. Judge Daniels is bringing the jury in. Inner City Press has been covering the trial and will live tweet below
Larry Doud was not at the defense table earlier today while his lawyers argued with the prosecutors about how to respond to a jury note about fenanyl dosage. But he's at the table now. Still waiting for the jury and their verdict.
Jury entering!
Judge Daniels: We received your note, that you have a verdict. So I'll ask my law clerk to get it.
Foreperson: Guilty!
Did Defendant Doud conspire to distribute fentanyl?
Foreperson: Yes. 400 grams and more.
Court 2?
Foreperson: Guilty.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 2
OK - now in Jan 6 Oath Keepers' case, DDC Judge Mehta is holding a proceeding including on requests for voir dire about prejudice. Inner City Press has covered the case innercitypress.com/ddc32oathkeepe… and will live tweet, thread below
Defense requests mailing out to prospective jurors a questionnaire to assess bias.
Judge Mehta: I don't like the idea of mailing it out. But I agree that this jury selection will raise challenging questions, given the profile of events on January 6.
Judge Mehta: We're supposed to start trial on April 19. What if I called the jurors in by April 5?
Voice: The dates sound good. On April 5, do they just come in and fill out the form?
Mehta: I don't know if the defendants themselves want to be present.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 2
OK - it's US v. Avenatti, Day 8, now the closing arguments in the Stormy Daniels case. Inner City Press covered the charging conference innercitypress.com/sdnytrial15ave… and will live tweet the summations and legal instructions, thread below
Judge Furman: Welcome back, jurors. Now you know Mr. Avenatti was a part of these events, so he will inevitably refer to himself in his closing. But he is not testifying. The government may proceed.
AUSA: "The defendant was a lawyer who stole from his own client."
AUSA: He told lies to try to cover it all up. Lies he told to try to get away with it. But he failed. His lies caught up with him. At this trial, the truth came out. Defendant's lies were exposed. He committed fraud and ID theft.
Read 81 tweets
Feb 1
While waiting for US v. Avenatti charging conference, here is UN press briefing from from which Inner City Press is banned, today from briefing by incoming UN Security Council president. Aim to live tweet below the Q&A of those the UN *does* let in 1/x
Even as of 1:12 pm Feb 1, the most recent UNSC "Program of Work" on the UN's website is from January, that of @NorwayUN's @Mona_Juul, a month of failure and coups and censorship. And February? First question goes to UN Censorship Alliance, UNCA 2/x
Next handpicked questions: Qatar state media. Also nothing on the #GenocideGamesOfGuterres - perhaps not surprising, since Qatar bought the next FIFA World Cup despite rampant abuse of migrant labor. 3/x pressfreedomtracker.us/all-incidents/…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(