Thread by @EmpireinWinter

Public-Health & Medical Professionals for Transparency
filed a FOIA to obtain Pfizer's 1st data on adverse events
from jab authorization on 12/2020 to 28/2/2021.
Redacted #doses prevents calculation of % but 42k adverse-events cases, >20k serious.
phmpt.org/wp-content/upl…

https://twitter.com/albertarabbit/status/1489123701316595714

Of 42k adverse events cases,
25379 "medically confirmed"
totaling
158,893 specific events reported across 42k cases

Case outcomes:
1223 fatal
11361 not recovered
520 recovered w/sequelae
9400 unknown
19582 [fully] recovered / [not] recovering

Redacted total of jabs (making rate calc. impossible)
42k cases, 25k "medically confirmed"
1223 Fatal
22504 Not known to be fully recovered
(includes Unknown + not yet recovered + sequelae)
19582 Recovered / recovering (which is it: 1 recovered + 19581 recovering? or reverse?)

At best then, of 42k cases (25k medically confirmed),
22504 (53%) are NOT medically confirmed to be fully recovered after 1 to 90 days (45 avg)
19582 recovered/recovering (data fudge!)
If,
1 recovered, 19581 recovering then NOT medically confirmed to be recovered rises to 99%.

But if, conversely,
19581 fully recovered & 1 recovering (then why not split these categories?)
then
*at best*
46.53% are known to be recovered over a range of 1 to 90 days of the total 42k reported cases coming in at the average rate of 935 day.

On what basis / safety cut off metric / definition of 'rare' does FDA--
which we hope does have # of doses--
receiving this 1st report,
declare w/ supreme & never-to-be-shaken confidence:

935 cases / day
27 deaths / day (if avg interval = 45 days)
53% not yet recovered

safe?

This is Pfizer's first formal, official, mandatory report to the regulator.

Who reads this, and then assures us we can take our eyes off the ball?

And not a single mainstream journalist or Trusted News Initiative MD does these calculations and expresses doubts?

@threadreaderapp unroll