Ben Pile Profile picture
Feb 4 15 tweets 4 min read
Up on TR in a moment -@AndrewOrlowski vs Bob Ward.

@AndrewOrlowski Evasive answer to Iain Collin's simple questions from Bob Ward.
Ward is always so defensive and aggressive, out of the gate.
Calm and reasonable opening argument from Andrew. Bob shouting over him.
Andrew argues that demonisation of shale gas has led to us paying up to 10 times more than the USA.

Bob, ranting, says that it can't work in the UK because the european market will take it away.

But European countries banned domestic gas production too.
Bob accuses Andrew of 'smirking'. Such a nasty little grunt.
Bob doubles down on the alarmist rhetoric.

Andrew counters that Ward's apocalypticism is not supported by the IPCC, and that the green movement is dominated by anti-human philosophy.

Gives some technical detail on viability of low carbon non-solutions.
Bob frames Andrew's argument as a "denial of risks".

Demands Andrew admits that prices have gone up because of our dependence on gas.
Bob losing it quite badly.
Andrew trying to quote Bob's boss, billionaire neomalthusian Jeremy Grantham.

Bob denies that Grantham is his boss.
Andrew keeping extremely cool.

Bob LIVID! Expect an angry rant from him on his @LSEnews blog.

End of discussion.
@LSEnews Conclusion:

Greens, whether politicians, hackademics, activists, or wonks, do not come from a culture of debate and democracy.

Billionaire lackeys are not used to hearing the word 'no'.

And they both show.
@LSEnews Bob has a long history of screeching at political enemies -- smear-mongering, fearmongering, censorship on behalf of Nick Stern and Jeremy Grantham...

But the bottom line can no longer support his histrionics.

Audience are with Andrew.
@LSEnews Thanks to @iancollinsuk for being another broadcaster who *is* willing to have debate.
@LSEnews @iancollinsuk Footnote... Bob thinks he won the argument and the audience's affections.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Pile

Ben Pile Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @clim8resistance

Feb 6
"Only people who agree with me may disagree with me".

Episode 8,934.
OK, Jimmy, they'll do for starters. But I have plenty more suggestions...

4. Withdraw from the Paris "Agreement".

5. Stop participating in the UNFCCC & IPCC.

6. Investigate civil society organisations sources of funding.

7. Suspend the assets of philanthropists found to be using charities as lobbying vehicles.

...
Read 6 tweets
Feb 6
Glad to see some criticism of technical policy here, but @PaulEmbery is wrong when he says that windfall tax and nationalisation are the answer.

The market did not cause the problems of the Climate Change Act & EU Directives & similar. Policy distorted the market.
@PaulEmbery A *far from exhaustive* list of the state's energy policy failures since 1997 is here.

@PaulEmbery There was not much wrong with the energy market before the European and cross-party consensus on climate & energy policy emerged to ruin it. NB: '95/'96 methodology change. Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 6
Aside Beijing Barry's questionable statistical claims, the claim that abolishing VAT on domestic energy would "benefit" wealthier people more defeats itself.

Gardiner has been at the centre of domestic, EU and global green policymaking, and bears responsibility for the crisis.
If the amount poorer households pay for energy is "more" (as a proportion of their income) than what wealthier households pay, then the 5% VAT is of greater significance to them than to their richer counterparts.

But of course, green zealots are no friends of arithmetic & logic.
If you want to know more about the strange relationships between the CCP and the UK's carbon technocrats -- many of which were appointed under the post-97 Labour governments -- read @DavidRoseUK's recent Unherd piece... unherd.com/2021/12/does-t…
Read 20 tweets
Feb 5
"Mrs Dorries said: ‘This government said it would legislate to make the UK the safest place in the world to be online while enshrining free speech, and that’s exactly what we are going to do'."

Idiots such as @NadineDorries make such laws to protect themselves from criticism.
@NadineDorries You cannot "enshrine free speech" while restricting speech.

Making threats of violence is already illegal.

Unfortunately, being such a monumentally fucking stupid minister that you don't notice yourself turning into a fascist is not.
Safetyism is precisely the pretext fascists and other totalitarians used to close down speech.

Unstable, reckless, illegitimate governments seek power to protect themselves.

The government is a greater danger than 'misinformation'.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 5
Why?

It's not going to cost you any less.

It's the STATE that created the mess.
It was the state that created the opportunities for cold callers and doorstop sellers.

It was the state that closed coal fired power stations.

It was the state that created huge subsidies for wind and solar farms.

It was the state that created the Climate Change Act...
It was the state that abandoned manifesto pledges to abolish fuel poverty.

It was the state that changed the metric by which fuel poverty was measured.

It was the state that tried to fix the policy failures of the Climate Change Act and renewable energy targets with the EMR.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 5
The inability to make a distinction between a virus & pandemic on one hand, and CO2 & GW on the other is the expression of ignorance, confusion, actual *anti-science*, and mystical holism.

Moreover, we can see over the GW era a big reduction in deaths from infectious diseases.
She is of course, drip fed the notion of crises, which she is neither equipped nor willing to challenge.

But in contrast to any point in human history,

* there is no health crisis,

* there is no ecological crisis,

* there is no climate crisis.
Society should be challenging the weirdo mystical holism, not force feeding it to children. And institutional science should be at the front of that challenge.

Her understand is absolutely out of kilter with reality. ImageImageImageImage
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(