Two things on the advertising market: (1) over many years, we established two companies (google/facebook) took most of the growth (“duopoly”) leading now to significant legislation and enforcement. They’ve long had talking points fed thru allies to spin scrutiny in order to… /1
try to dilute the point: a) “not globally!” (then they include China where they mostly don’t do business), b) “some of that is gross and we share it!” (ignoring the control of the $ flow and terms of trade go thru them), c) more recently, “it’s a tripololy! look at Amazon!”… /2
on the last point, Amazon finally broke out ad revenues of $35 billion. The duopoly were $325 billion last year. Amazon has too much market power and they’re leveraging for ad $, too. But let’s be clear, they don’t compete or weaken the lawsuits around google or Facebook. /3
2) just as it’s true it was highly misleading to spread overall digital ad euphoria in 2014-20 when a duopoly was taking near 100% of incremental growth, it’s absurd to suggest Facebook’s slowdown indicates slowdown of the sector. Facebook is getting pummeled mostly because… /4
surveillance advertising is under pressure by tracking prevention from tech (thank you, Apple) and law (welcome to party, GDPR and CPRA). Facebook is more dependent on 3rd party data than anyone. But their decline is everyone else’s gain and not likely Amazon or Google’s. /5
Any media property with a direct, trusted relationship with its audience has huge opportunity. Snap’s upturn yesterday shows they’re likely one beneficiary. Who else will be? Advertisers $ will reallocate across digital as they continue to work to create desire and demand. /6
The best positioned are publishers with significant streaming assets (rocket growth, high value), “zero party” data (volunteered user data as part of product offering), and a clear brand value and product differentiation who are ready to lead on consumer expectations. And also /7
who have ignored convoluted universal tracking systems (email hashing) and attempts by ad tech / surveillance beneficiaries (including Google and Facebook) to protect the status quo that have come out of places like the IAB. Those ready to evolve will win. Solve this problem: /8
Deliver relevant digital advertising to audiences around streaming video or on platforms with tracking prevention (iOS, Safari, Firefox) and you’ll be ready for a cookieless, private world and benefit more than anyone. HUGE opportunity. /eof
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Friday night court filings add to Facebook's horrible terrible week. Judge stepped in and ran over FB affirming expectations on negligent discovery: 1) production of Zuckerberg's notebooks 2) discovery of Zuckerberg/Sandberg 3) details on FB's secret whitelisting data deals
/1
4) production of 9 plaintiffs' data in Facebook's possession - ALL OF IT (more on this in a second) 5) more depositions 6) production of Facebook's "secret sauce" memo (all revisions)
now some details...
/2
On the plaintiffs' data ordered for discovery, Facebook's legal team has tries to argue they only have to turn over the data which is accessible or shared. Read what the Judge said about this back to Facebook confirming this is Facebook's position. Which leads naturally to... /3
After listening to Facebook’s earnings a second time because a $270B drop in valuation deserves it, a few things stood out to me. First, the CFO, who I’ve been saying for 18 months needs to be clearer about their kneecapping, said the word “headwinds” 25 times so it’s a start. /1
Second, I’m seeing too much focus on flat/drop of Daily Active Users. Yes, that’s new but it’s their loss in ability to microtarget users as they’re opting out of tracking (iOS) plus CA and EU privacy laws are catching up to them that kneecaps their surveillance biz model. /2
Let’s listen in to their earnings a bit here. Here is the CFO during Q&A talking through some of the “headwinds” related to iOS and he also sort of mentions they may not be able to transfer data across the Atlantic any more (Schrems II). /3
ok, I'm here. Facebook earnings. Since they're getting clobbered, I expect they'll talk a lot about shiny new things and blame underperformance on "competition" as because any pressure on growth will be used as a defense for their antitrust lawsuits with state AGs and FTC. /1
drinking game for 5pm, have a drink every time Mark, Sheryl or Dave use a derivative of the word "compete." Pace yourselves. /2
This is the FUD section still as I pointed out Q2 last year. Just in case anyone wants to ask Facebook to finally disclose arguably the most important metric to their ads business and 97%+ of their revenues. /3
Meanwhile in 9th circuit - case where discovery has been ordered for Zuckerberg+Sandberg related to Cambridge cover-up, along with a lot of sensitive discovery... Facebook is losing A LOT lately. FB has been arguing users' data isn't retrievable because...it's everywhere... /1
Facebook has been trying to avoid turning over its' "Secret Sauce Report", including now all iterations of the living document, since June 2020. /2
Again, Court seems to be rightly getting impatient. These deadlines issued last night are for tomorrow. /3
OK, I'm listening to Google's earnings. If they don't get a single question about state AGs charges of collusion and market rigging with Facebook - including newly unsealed internal messages at both companies - then the entire analyst Q&A is a complete joke. /1
By the way, yes, I already layered in the Google advertising numbers from the earnings tonight and never fear - I know you were worried - the swallowing of the advertising market by Google continued last year. /2
yoo-hoo, I mean he's literally on the earnings call. He signed the deal with Sheryl Sandberg at Facebook. Seems like a question but what do I know? Don't poke the bear. /3
woah, I missed this. F*%&ing crazy. This NYT report is that, according to a presentation they reviewed, Peter Thiel - forever board member of Facebook - Founders Fund invested in a company that could hack into WhatsApp? Do I have that right? He's a remarkable board member. /1
A good time to remind that the NYT also reported Peter Thiel backed Clearview AI - the company that claimed according to reports to have scraped 3 billion images from Facebook for surveillance purposes. /2
And of course, there is still Palantir, co-founded by Peter Thiel, that - you guessed it - the NYT reported had people who helped Cambridge Analytica scrape its data. Thiel is defendant in shareholder derivative lawsuits since he's both on the board and co-founded Palantir. /3