Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Feb 4 11 tweets 2 min read
This was my 2 tweet thread from 12th December 2019. Well was I right?
Here's where I "guaranteed" on 19th December 2019, just after Johnson got elected, that he'd suddenly become very unpopular, very quickly at some point. The time period I predicted for that was 2-3 years i.e. Dec 21 to Dec22.
These were not guesses. I am not a psychic. I use what I call big picture analysis to come to these conclusions. Anyone can do this if they open their eyes. Actually it's not about learning something, it is about unlearning our bad thinking habits.
People used to laugh at me when I said we needn't fear the Soviet Union, because if we just ignored it, it would collapse. But when the Berlin Wall fell, no one said, oh you were right.
In fact, when I do point out to people what I said, they just dismiss it as a lucky guess, that I couldn't possibly have known. But these are note guesses, they are based on a deep understanding of how the system works.
Take my predictions about Johnson. This is what they were based on. Johnson's reckless impulsive behaviour means he is constantly bounced from scandal to scandal, and predictably tells bigger and bigger lies to cover them up.
The Tories and the Tory Press would cover up for him, sweep it under the carpet. That was why I thought he'd get away with it for about 2 years. But then it would get very difficult to keep sweeping them under the carpet.
Or the scandal would be so big, that the more Johnson lied to cover it up, the more the Tory Press and his colleagues tried to cover up, the bigger the scandal would get.
I'm flabbergasted that highly paid political commentators, and senior Tories think he can recover, if he can scrape through this. Because even if he limps on, he'll just shoot himself in the foot again, and again.
PS. The context of my tweets, was that I said if the opposition parties had refused Johnson an election, which was in their power, and the election wasn't held until June 2022, the Tories would get wiped out because of Johnson's unpopularity. Imagine if anyone had listened to me?
The purpose of my tweets, was not to brag about being right. I'm simply fed up with us being abused by the powerful, when what would happens was often entirely predictable.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

Feb 3
You know all these massive price rises we face.

"Ten richest men double their fortunes in pandemic while incomes of 99 percent of humanity fall"

"The world’s ten richest men more than doubled their fortunes from $700 billion to $1.5 trillion ..."
1/
oxfam.org/en/press-relea…
What we see is a malignant system, I mean that quite literally, like a cancer. The richer these billionaires get, plus the ones just below them, the greedier they get, the richer they get, and the more control they have over our societies.
2/
What does an individual need $1 billion for, let alone $269 billion? A billion is a thousand million. It's difficult to get your head around these figures. If your total net worth increased by 1 million a year, you'd need to live to a thousand years to accumulate a billion.
3/
Read 34 tweets
Feb 2
I'm alarmed at how most people don't understand the danger our democracy is and are focusing on the wrong part of the scandal.

Never before has a British PM being allowed to tell one barefaced lie after another to parliament, and to not be properly challenged about it.
1/🧵
This is not just another scandal. This is unprecedented in the history of British democracy. Yes, it has been alleged that other British PMs lied or misled parliament. But this is the thing, there has never been clear cut evidence to contradict them.
2/
Before I go on, I will make it crystal clear why this is so serious and dangerous. If a British PM is allowed to lie time and again to the House, without challenge, there is the very serious danger we could sleep walk into a dictatorship.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
Read 23 tweets
Feb 1
It is my contention that the climate and ecological emergency, all injustice, dictatorial regimes etc, are all facilitated by one singular thing and that is LYING TO THE PUBLIC to seriously mislead them. That the system as it is facilitates this lying by the powerful.
For clarity, I am saying the system as it is, which was designed by the powerful for their own benefit, has built in mechanisms to protect powerful liars, and to stop anyone properly challenging them. That the media are complicit in this. That is must be changed.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 1
This is very important to understand.

It's all very well to have a principle which forbids an MP from accusing another of lying. It is quite another thing to demand an MP say that false statement was inadvertent.
1/🧵
To insist as happened yesterday, when Sir Lindsay Hoyle insisted that Ian Blackford MP, say Boris Johnson "inadvertently misled the House", was in effect a demand that Ian Blackford lie to the House of Commons and mislead the public who were watching.
2/
To say that an MP's false statement was "inadvertent" i.e. accidental, is a positive statement of fact. It would be highly misleading if that statement were not true, a knowing lie - if the MP making the original the false statement, was knowingly lying.
3/
Read 27 tweets
Feb 1
I want to very quickly explain why I was absolutely certain Boris Johnson was going to become very unpopular, very quickly, in about 2-3 years after the December 2019 General Election. I am not psychic.
People with ingrained personality disorders tend to behave in the same way throughout their life. They keep behaving in the same way over and over again, and just can't stop themselves. See this for proof.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
Boris Johnson has 2 primary behavioural traits, which made this scandal entirely predictable.

1) He behaves recklessly as if rules don't apply to him, meaning he will get involved in one scandal after another. He ever learns from experience.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 1
This is my take on why the Metropolitan Police left it so long before suddenly mounting an investigation, just before Sue Gray's report was ready for publications. Up until this point, the police were quite happy to say, let's see Sue Gray's report first.
Then for whatever, reason, the police launched a sudden investigation, just before the publication of Sue Gray's report. As I explained, there was a very simple explanation for this. That a number of Downing St police officers, had been only too willing to speak Sue Gray.
It was widely reported 8 days ago, that Downing Street police were only too willing to speak to Sue Gray, even though they could not be compelled to speak to her. That they'd given Sue Gray damning evidence.
mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(